When you are shooting 66% from 3, 100% free throws, and only 3 TOs but are only winning by 5 in the second half, that's a problem
Crazy to say, but I think we abandon the zone going forward. Offense was at it's best all year. Ball St. is a good opponent... ESPN only gave us like a 54% chance to win the game and we won by 20+. If Quade and Jaden shoot like that the rest of the year we're really, really good. Quade has really shown up the last couple games! Seems he needed a few games to get comfortable.
Ball state is a Good opponent!!!
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!!
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus.
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus. Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus. Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric. Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus. Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric. Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus. Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric. Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure That's not how the quads work. They aren't 25% each. You have to be top 150 out of over 300 on nuetral court for quad 3.
Ball state is a Good opponent!!! So is Texas Southern!! No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference. I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference. Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...See the difference? Jesus. Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric. Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure That's not how the quads work. They aren't 25% each. You have to be top 150 out of over 300 on nuetral court for quad 3. So 150 of 320 d1 teams are “good”? Someone tell the cougs they’re good, they’ll be thrilled
This crowd is dumb.