Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
String is toast
Comments
-
Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.Ron_Fairly said:Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?
-
He_Needs_More_Time said:
CaptainPJ is pressing terribly in
thisevery thread. -
Yeah, but still...Swaye said:
Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.Ron_Fairly said:Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?
-
i'm going with your noted expertise in all matters relating to receiving stiff punishment.d2d said:Peterman is known for stiff punishment... just sayin.
-
QB matters a shit ton more than WR.
(water is wet)
-
... because Sark said so?RoadDawg55 said:
This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The qb situation was fine with or without miles.
With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.
Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.
You can't say that about the other two.
If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus. -
Say, 34-17?He_Needs_More_Time said:
For the record when I say concern I'm only talking about Stanford, at Oregon, at Arizona, UCLA and I guess at WSU. I think UW wins every other game rather easily.RoadDawg55 said:
If Callier is the starter I will be concerned. Otherwise, I think we are fine at RB. I'm pretty high on Washington, and Petersen called Cooper a great player. It will probably be by committee, but we should be solid at RB. I'm even excited to see Shaq hopefully get a few carries.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The difference between Paus against Oregon and Miles is Paus if you look back was 5 for 8 passing in that game. We didn't see Paus in any other action either. Miles we saw start against Oregon State, play the 4th in a bowl game against BYU, play 3 quarters in the scrimmage vs Idaho State, play against Cal/Colorado and play the entire second half at UCLA.RoadDawg55 said:
This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The qb situation was fine with or without miles.
With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.
Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.
You can't say that about the other two.
If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus.
I felt like we've seen enough of Miles to know he won't be a bum. If Williams or Lindquist beats out Miles then I have confidence in them. Now if they were the starters and Miles wasn't in the picture then I'd still be worried.
Like I'm worried about the RB position even though I think Washington/Coleman/Callier/Cooper should be enough I'll still have some concerns. -
So Lindquist is better because you want him to be better? The smart money is on Miles being better. It's not just Sark that thought so. Players did as well.sarktastic said:
... because Sark said so?RoadDawg55 said:
This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The qb situation was fine with or without miles.
With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.
Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.
You can't say that about the other two.
If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus.
-
Little Jimmy silence in this thread speaks volumes.......Swaye said:
Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.Ron_Fairly said:Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?
-
And in DJ's thread (ILTCHDJ)He_Needs_More_Time said:
Little Jimmy silence in this thread speaks volumes.......Swaye said:
Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.Ron_Fairly said:Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?






