Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

String is toast

1235712

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,219 Standard Supporter

    CaptainPJ is pressing terribly in this every thread.

  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,848 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?

    Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.
    Yeah, but still...
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    QB matters a shit ton more than WR.

    (water is wet)
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    The qb situation was fine with or without miles.

    Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.

    With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.

    Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.

    You can't say that about the other two.
    This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.

    If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus.

    ... because Sark said so?
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623

    The qb situation was fine with or without miles.

    Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.

    With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.

    Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.

    You can't say that about the other two.
    This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.

    If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus.

    The difference between Paus against Oregon and Miles is Paus if you look back was 5 for 8 passing in that game. We didn't see Paus in any other action either. Miles we saw start against Oregon State, play the 4th in a bowl game against BYU, play 3 quarters in the scrimmage vs Idaho State, play against Cal/Colorado and play the entire second half at UCLA.

    I felt like we've seen enough of Miles to know he won't be a bum. If Williams or Lindquist beats out Miles then I have confidence in them. Now if they were the starters and Miles wasn't in the picture then I'd still be worried.

    Like I'm worried about the RB position even though I think Washington/Coleman/Callier/Cooper should be enough I'll still have some concerns.
    If Callier is the starter I will be concerned. Otherwise, I think we are fine at RB. I'm pretty high on Washington, and Petersen called Cooper a great player. It will probably be by committee, but we should be solid at RB. I'm even excited to see Shaq hopefully get a few carries.

    For the record when I say concern I'm only talking about Stanford, at Oregon, at Arizona, UCLA and I guess at WSU. I think UW wins every other game rather easily.

    Say, 34-17?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam

    The qb situation was fine with or without miles.

    Really? Lindquist and Williams haven't proven anything. Now I think we could have been fine but with only two QB's who I've never seen throw a pass in college football you could have a Paus-Stanback scenario from 2004-2005.

    With Miles that is a game changer. He's proven he can win on the road against a conference team. He's played in a bowl game, he's played an entire second half against a ranked UCLA. Miles has proven he can play at this level.

    Will Miles be great? I don't know. Will he be better than Price? Who knows but I'd bet on yes. He has proven though that he won't suck and will be a good college QB in his reps during a college game.

    You can't say that about the other two.
    This. We don't know exactly how good Miles is, but at the very least, he's a competent QB you can win with. He played pretty well at UCLA considering he came in after halftime and played a top 25 team on the road. He looked fine the other times he played too. The flip side of that is Casey Paus looked good against Oregon, but was fucking terrible when he became the starter. I don't think that is the case with Miles though.

    If someone beats Miles out, they are probably pretty good. Now, you know it is a heated competition and a good QB will end up winning the job. We don't know how good Lindquist or Williams is. I would presume Lindquist is worse than Miles considering Miles has been ahead of him since they got on campus.

    ... because Sark said so?
    So Lindquist is better because you want him to be better? The smart money is on Miles being better. It's not just Sark that thought so. Players did as well.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Swaye said:

    Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?

    Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.
    Little Jimmy silence in this thread speaks volumes.......
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    Swaye said:

    Can we get back to talking about global warming and IDs?

    Yep. For all the slack jawed faggots that always cry about no football discussion, I present this thread. Now shut the fuck up with the crying. You know who you are.
    Little Jimmy silence in this thread speaks volumes.......
    And in DJ's thread (ILTCHDJ)