Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Can we talk about the obstruction of justice case Mueller and the Rats tried to bring against Trump?

13

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462

    Couldn’t? Or didn’t?
    Who came in and disputed the charges then?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    SFGbob said:

    The IG just wrote a big report on how this investigation wasn't valid
    He said the opposite.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    HHusky said:

    You girls won’t even concede Daddy did anything wrong. Don’t lecture me about bipartisanship.
    Hi there. I’ve always accepted that this was a bad move. Most sane people do. But it doesn’t warrant removal from office.

    But you knew that already.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited December 2019
    HHusky said:

    Who came in and disputed the charges then?
    You act the the witness list and shiffs rules weren't a partisan shit show.

    Sondland all a sudden got a refreshed memory after a congressman intimated the witness by calling for a boycott of his business. How that isn't a felony is beyond me.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    You girls won’t even concede Daddy did anything wrong. Don’t lecture me about bipartisanship.
    I often don't like things Trump does. There is nothing to impeach him for. Absolutely nothing rises to that level and you know it. It's you that refuses to concede anything.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    edited December 2019
    HHusky said:

    You girls won’t even concede Daddy did anything wrong. Don’t lecture me about bipartisanship.
    Fuck you. You're a lying sack of shit who doesn't care a whit about the truth or facts. Hands up don't shoot Kunt. Did you ever apologize for that lie O'Keefed? Fuck no, in fact you still like to argue some fantasy world bullshit about how you really got the facts right about that case.


    Have you even once conceded that you've repeatedly been caught lying right out your ass? Did you every retract your lie about Hillary and her emails?


    Did ever retract any of these fucking lies?


    Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.

    Police canceled the game.

    It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.


    Fuck off O'Keefed.





  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    edited December 2019
    salemcoog said:

    Hi there. I’ve always accepted that this was a bad move. Most sane people do. But it doesn’t warrant removal from office.

    But you knew that already.
    I guess we can have a debate here about whether withholding aid unless the President receives a personal benefit is impeachable then. That would be more honest than what’s going on in Washington DC.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    Sledog said:

    I often don't like things Trump does. There is nothing to impeach him for. Absolutely nothing rises to that level and you know it. It's you that refuses to concede anything.
    He’s being impeached for very specific actions. If you don’t find them impeachable, be direct.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I guess we can have a debate here about whether withholding aid unless the President receives a personal benefit is impeachable then. That would be more honest than what’s going on in Washington DC.
    What personal benefit did he receive? The aid was delivered.

    He said he wants nothing.

    Saying you need to look into the Biden's maybe you could talk to the AG (I'll help you that's the attorney general) certainly sounds terrible. I mean why talk to the head law enforcement officer in the US about shady dealings by a US citizen.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    edited December 2019
    HHusky said:

    I guess we can have a debate here about whether withholding aid unless the President receives a personal benefit is impeachable then. That would be more honest than what’s going on in Washington DC.
    Partisan politics suck.

    It gave you your articles of impeachment.

    And will result in an acquittal with your team on their ass and then licking your wounds, once they get up.

    All the while the Progressive Democrats will put up a senile old man to embarrass himself on national TV against Daddy in the debates.

    Sad.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    edited December 2019
    Sledog said:

    What personal benefit did he receive? The aid was delivered.

    He said he wants nothing.

    Saying you need to look into the Biden's maybe you could talk to the AG (I'll help you that's the attorney general) certainly sounds terrible. I mean why talk to the head law enforcement officer in the US about shady dealings by a US citizen.
    You can look into Biden to your heart’s content. That’s not a defense. Neither is the fact that Daddy didn’t get the benefit he sought because his scheme was discovered. Daddy didn’t come in and offer a different explanation—he just told everyone not to cooperate.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2019
    HHusky said:

    You can look into Biden to your heart’s content. That’s not a defense. Neither is the fact that Daddy didn’t get the benefit he sought because his scheme was discovered. Daddy didn’t come in and offer a different explanation—he just told everyone not to cooperate.
    They don't have to cooperate. And why would he cooperate in a totally rigged partisan clown circus?

    That's what trump said and it process you wrong. The AG is the guy. And that is who Trump refered to.

    He had every right to call or corruption when he saw it. I fact he had a duty to do so.

    Are you sure you're an attorney?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    Sledog said:

    They don't have to cooperate. And why would he cooperate in a totally rigged partisan clown circus?

    That's what trump said and it process you wrong. The AG is the guy. And that is who Trump refered to.

    He had every right to call or corruption when he saw it. I fact he had a duty to do so.

    Are you sure you're an attorney?
    Are you sure you’re an American? That document you claim to have sworn an oath doesn’t permit the Executive to avoid lawful examination.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    HHusky said:

    You can look into Biden to your heart’s content. That’s not a defense. Neither is the fact that Daddy didn’t get the benefit he sought because his scheme was discovered. Daddy didn’t come in and offer a different explanation—he just told everyone not to cooperate.
    A Prosecutor, you shall never be.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Are you sure you’re an American? That document you claim to have sworn an oath doesn’t permit the Executive to avoid lawful examination.
    Does in this case. Sure you've read it?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    salemcoog said:

    A Prosecutor, you shall never be.
    Imagine my disappointment.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    HHusky said:

    Imagine my disappointment.
    It isn’t hard. You really don't have to try.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2019
    As a cop if I investigated a reported possible crime and there may be cause to investigate. But I receive untested, unverified information and I continue with my investigation and i learn that the info is no good and unreliable. I then provide false info to obtain three warrants and lie to the judge about the source of the information and withhold exculpatory information. My question is, how much time would I do in prison?

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Sledog said:

    As a cop if I investigated a reported possible crime and there may be cause to investigate. But I receive untested, unverified information and I continue with my investigation and i learn that the info is no good and unreliable. I then provide false info to obtain three warrants and lie to the judge about the source of the information and withhold exculpatory information. My question is, how much time would I do in prison?

    It would be 1 8 7 on a mother fuckin cop!
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896

    It would be 1 8 7 on a mother fuckin cop!
    It’s not in the paper, it’s on the wall!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.