Jimmy: "James, I want you to think really hard about this. Weigh all your options. Make sure Washington isnt too far away from home. Is it the right school for you? I want you to make sure there aren't better schools out there." Smith: "No, coach. I'm all UW" Jimmy: "James, I dont think you are hearing me..."
Jimmy: "James, I want you to think really hard about this. Weigh all your options. Make sure Washington isnt too far away from home. Is it the right school for you? I want you to make sure there aren't better schools out there." Smith: "No, coach. I'm all UW" Jimmy: "James, I dont think you are hearing me..."
You don't go in home with a kid you don't want to keep
Jimmy: "James, I want you to think really hard about this. Weigh all your options. Make sure Washington isnt too far away from home. Is it the right school for you? I want you to make sure there aren't better schools out there." Smith: "No, coach. I'm all UW" Jimmy: "James, I dont think you are hearing me..."
You don't go in home with a kid you don't want to keep
Jimmy: "James, I want you to think really hard about this. Weigh all your options. Make sure Washington isnt too far away from home. Is it the right school for you? I want you to make sure there aren't better schools out there." Smith: "No, coach. I'm all UW" Jimmy: "James, I dont think you are hearing me..."
You don't go in home with a kid you don't want to keep
Especially not three days after being announced as the next corch
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
Jordan Miller type
It seemed like we were hearing amazing things about Miller for years before I ever saw him play. I think he just kept getting dinged up and missing time, and I missed the snaps he was in for.
I guess I point this out partly because Miller would have been so much better off if he had come in with the depth the way it is now as opposed to when he started out. The dings from being forced into action as a stick figure accumulated on him. He was good but didn't reach the potential he came in with.
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
Jordan Miller type
It seemed like we were hearing amazing things about Miller for years before I ever saw him play. I think he just kept getting dinged up and missing time, and I missed the snaps he was in for.
I guess I point this out partly because Miller would have been so much better off if he had come in with the depth the way it is now as opposed to when he started out. The dings from being forced into action as a stick figure accumulated on him. He was good but didn't reach the potential he came in with.
Comments
Smith: "No, coach. I'm all UW"
Jimmy: "James, I dont think you are hearing me..."
I just want to know why we haven't offered the Soph who took his playing time.
Also I noticed this today, I don't know what good jump numbers are but these seem good
https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=11245536
Kind of a DB MJ Ale.
I like him.
https://247sports.com/Player/Rayshon-Luke-46084269/
Don’t kill another joke by overusing, fuckstick.
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
I guess I point this out partly because Miller would have been so much better off if he had come in with the depth the way it is now as opposed to when he started out. The dings from being forced into action as a stick figure accumulated on him. He was good but didn't reach the potential he came in with.