What is with this point that requiring ID to vote is racial voter suppression?

TurdBomber said:

MikeDamone said:

https://youtu.be/rrBxZGWCdgs

Video Krypton for the HondoBros.

No comment from Hondo. I’m sure if he did it would be and ad hominem

TurdBomber said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

How do these people without ID, who are adults, actually function in society? ( Drive cars, buy alcohol, rent tools, rent an apartment, get a job, get something notarized, travel outside the us, etc ). I seriously don't get why this argument keeps coming up.

I am asking to understand why this is an important thing to allow in our society. No one has ever given me a reasonable argument but I know there are some really smart liberal people on this forum who can explain it to me.

That much is obvious.

Another great explanation, as always.

Do you need me to spoonfeed the answer to you? Seriously, Google is your friend.

Spoonfeed please. In your words.

Only cause you asked nicely.

You see, it's believed that the majority of people without ID vote Democrat. So, under the veil of trying to eradicate voter fraud, Republicans want to require voters to present ID to vote. The facts that known voter fraud is essentially zero. Most votes are done by absentee ballot now. And race is irrelevant. Don't matter to Republicans who just want to win elections.

Next time in English, Please.

Known voter fraud is essentially zero. What's so hard for you to understand?

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBomber said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

How do these people without ID, who are adults, actually function in society? ( Drive cars, buy alcohol, rent tools, rent an apartment, get a job, get something notarized, travel outside the us, etc ). I seriously don't get why this argument keeps coming up.

I am asking to understand why this is an important thing to allow in our society. No one has ever given me a reasonable argument but I know there are some really smart liberal people on this forum who can explain it to me.

That much is obvious.

Another great explanation, as always.

Do you need me to spoonfeed the answer to you? Seriously, Google is your friend.

Spoonfeed please. In your words.

Only cause you asked nicely.

You see, it's believed that the majority of people without ID vote Democrat. So, under the veil of trying to eradicate voter fraud, Republicans want to require voters to present ID to vote. The facts that known voter fraud is essentially zero. Most votes are done by absentee ballot now. And race is irrelevant. Don't matter to Republicans who just want to win elections.

Next time in English, Please.

Known voter fraud is essentially zero. What's so hard for you to understand?

And yet when anyone looks they find it to be rampant

Fuck off

Link?

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBomber said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

How do these people without ID, who are adults, actually function in society? ( Drive cars, buy alcohol, rent tools, rent an apartment, get a job, get something notarized, travel outside the us, etc ). I seriously don't get why this argument keeps coming up.

I am asking to understand why this is an important thing to allow in our society. No one has ever given me a reasonable argument but I know there are some really smart liberal people on this forum who can explain it to me.

That much is obvious.

Another great explanation, as always.

Do you need me to spoonfeed the answer to you? Seriously, Google is your friend.

Spoonfeed please. In your words.

Only cause you asked nicely.

You see, it's believed that the majority of people without ID vote Democrat. So, under the veil of trying to eradicate voter fraud, Republicans want to require voters to present ID to vote. The facts that known voter fraud is essentially zero. Most votes are done by absentee ballot now. And race is irrelevant. Don't matter to Republicans who just want to win elections.

Next time in English, Please.

Known voter fraud is essentially zero. What's so hard for you to understand?

And yet when anyone looks they find it to be rampant

Fuck off

Link?

It’s a fact the dems what to minimize the instances of voter fraud and allow anyone to vote just so they can win elections.

See. I can do it too

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBomber said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

How do these people without ID, who are adults, actually function in society? ( Drive cars, buy alcohol, rent tools, rent an apartment, get a job, get something notarized, travel outside the us, etc ). I seriously don't get why this argument keeps coming up.

I am asking to understand why this is an important thing to allow in our society. No one has ever given me a reasonable argument but I know there are some really smart liberal people on this forum who can explain it to me.

That much is obvious.

Another great explanation, as always.

Do you need me to spoonfeed the answer to you? Seriously, Google is your friend.

Spoonfeed please. In your words.

Only cause you asked nicely.

You see, it's believed that the majority of people without ID vote Democrat. So, under the veil of trying to eradicate voter fraud, Republicans want to require voters to present ID to vote. The facts that known voter fraud is essentially zero. Most votes are done by absentee ballot now. And race is irrelevant. Don't matter to Republicans who just want to win elections.

Next time in English, Please.

Known voter fraud is essentially zero. What's so hard for you to understand?

And yet when anyone looks they find it to be rampant

Fuck off

Link?

It’s a fact the dems what to minimize the instances of voter fraud and allow anyone to vote just so they can win elections.

See. I can do it too

How can the Dems minimize instances of voter fraud Mike?

You just did it.

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

How about registering to vote? No proof of citizenship required?

Poll tax? Because you think certain people aren’t capable of getting an ID. Typical racist leftist.

Yeah, a few votes matter. Retard.

“The election was held on November 2, 2004, with the initial count showing Gregoire trailing Rossi by 261 votes. However, a legally mandated machine recount reduced that lead to only 42 votes, then a hand count that was requested and funded by the state's Democratic Party gave Gregoire a 10-vote lead. Following a State Supreme Court ruling that allowed several hundred ballots from King County to be included, her lead was further increased to 130 votes,[17] but when the vote was certified by the state's Secretary of State, Sam Reed, at the end of December, one vote which had been counted in Thurston County past the deadline was disqualified and her lead was reduced to 129 votes.[18] Washington's Republican leadership then filed suit, claiming that hundreds of votes, including votes by felons,[19] deceased voters,[20] and double voters,[20] were included in the canvass, but on June 6, 2005, Judge John E. Bridges ruled that the Republican party did not provide enough evidence that the disputed votes were ineligible—or for whom they were cast—to overturn the election.[21]”

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Dead-voted-in-governor-s-race-1163612.php

Of course you’ll say no “known fraud changed this election”. Perhaps the unknown did. Having proof of who a voter is would be the only way to be sure.

200 people drove drunk Friday in your town. 1 was caught. So that’s proof that no more than 1 person drove drunk.

You’re an imbecile. And a racist.

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

Thanks for your response. So you must not think there's much voter fraud going on, or you do and you're comfortable with it...

I've stated multiple times the number of known voter fraud is close to zero. Especially relative to the billions of votes cast. Which time confused you?

I take it you believe that millions of illegals voted in the last election.

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

How about registering to vote? No proof of citizenship required?

Poll tax? Because you think certain people aren’t capable of getting an ID. Typical racist leftist.

Yeah, a few votes matter. Retard.

“The election was held on November 2, 2004, with the initial count showing Gregoire trailing Rossi by 261 votes. However, a legally mandated machine recount reduced that lead to only 42 votes, then a hand count that was requested and funded by the state's Democratic Party gave Gregoire a 10-vote lead. Following a State Supreme Court ruling that allowed several hundred ballots from King County to be included, her lead was further increased to 130 votes,[17] but when the vote was certified by the state's Secretary of State, Sam Reed, at the end of December, one vote which had been counted in Thurston County past the deadline was disqualified and her lead was reduced to 129 votes.[18] Washington's Republican leadership then filed suit, claiming that hundreds of votes, including votes by felons,[19] deceased voters,[20] and double voters,[20] were included in the canvass, but on June 6, 2005, Judge John E. Bridges ruled that the Republican party did not provide enough evidence that the disputed votes were ineligible—or for whom they were cast—to overturn the election.[21]”

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Dead-voted-in-governor-s-race-1163612.php

Of course you’ll say no “known fraud changed this election”. Perhaps the unknown did. Having proof of who a voter is would be the only way to be sure.

200 people drove drunk Friday in your town. 1 was caught. So that’s proof that no more than 1 person drove drunk.

You’re an imbecile. And a racist.

If there were widespread voter fraud, it would be caught. The rest of your list is awesome. Throwing out racist for absolutely no reason.

I called it.

And your a racist. Poll tax. Lol. Racist fuck.

It doesn’t have to been widespread to make an impact. Idiot.

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

How about registering to vote? No proof of citizenship required?

Poll tax? Because you think certain people aren’t capable of getting an ID. Typical racist leftist.

Yeah, a few votes matter. Retard.

“The election was held on November 2, 2004, with the initial count showing Gregoire trailing Rossi by 261 votes. However, a legally mandated machine recount reduced that lead to only 42 votes, then a hand count that was requested and funded by the state's Democratic Party gave Gregoire a 10-vote lead. Following a State Supreme Court ruling that allowed several hundred ballots from King County to be included, her lead was further increased to 130 votes,[17] but when the vote was certified by the state's Secretary of State, Sam Reed, at the end of December, one vote which had been counted in Thurston County past the deadline was disqualified and her lead was reduced to 129 votes.[18] Washington's Republican leadership then filed suit, claiming that hundreds of votes, including votes by felons,[19] deceased voters,[20] and double voters,[20] were included in the canvass, but on June 6, 2005, Judge John E. Bridges ruled that the Republican party did not provide enough evidence that the disputed votes were ineligible—or for whom they were cast—to overturn the election.[21]”

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Dead-voted-in-governor-s-race-1163612.php

Of course you’ll say no “known fraud changed this election”. Perhaps the unknown did. Having proof of who a voter is would be the only way to be sure.

200 people drove drunk Friday in your town. 1 was caught. So that’s proof that no more than 1 person drove drunk.

You’re an imbecile. And a racist.

If there were widespread voter fraud, it would be caught. The rest of your list is awesome. Throwing out racist for absolutely no reason.

No one is looking in Democrat states

It's been caught when people look

Educate yourself

Link?

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Answer these questions:

Do you object to requiring ID to vote / register to vote? If so, why?

Isn't knowing who voted, precisely, fundamental to having a nice accurate election? I mean why be sloppy about this?

Requiring ID to vote has been shown to be a form of a poll tax. I do not support it as it's not shown to be effective at reducing voter fraud. It has shown to make it harder for some people to exercise their constitutionally given right to vote.

You ask isn't know who voted..... Show me any amount of known voter fraud that would change an election. In other words, you have a solution in need of a problem.

How about registering to vote? No proof of citizenship required?

Poll tax? Because you think certain people aren’t capable of getting an ID. Typical racist leftist.

Yeah, a few votes matter. Retard.

“The election was held on November 2, 2004, with the initial count showing Gregoire trailing Rossi by 261 votes. However, a legally mandated machine recount reduced that lead to only 42 votes, then a hand count that was requested and funded by the state's Democratic Party gave Gregoire a 10-vote lead. Following a State Supreme Court ruling that allowed several hundred ballots from King County to be included, her lead was further increased to 130 votes,[17] but when the vote was certified by the state's Secretary of State, Sam Reed, at the end of December, one vote which had been counted in Thurston County past the deadline was disqualified and her lead was reduced to 129 votes.[18] Washington's Republican leadership then filed suit, claiming that hundreds of votes, including votes by felons,[19] deceased voters,[20] and double voters,[20] were included in the canvass, but on June 6, 2005, Judge John E. Bridges ruled that the Republican party did not provide enough evidence that the disputed votes were ineligible—or for whom they were cast—to overturn the election.[21]”

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Dead-voted-in-governor-s-race-1163612.php

Of course you’ll say no “known fraud changed this election”. Perhaps the unknown did. Having proof of who a voter is would be the only way to be sure.

200 people drove drunk Friday in your town. 1 was caught. So that’s proof that no more than 1 person drove drunk.

You’re an imbecile. And a racist.

If there were widespread voter fraud, it would be caught. The rest of your list is awesome. Throwing out racist for absolutely no reason.

No one is looking in Democrat states

It's been caught when people look

Educate yourself

Link?

What part of educate yourself did you not understand. Shit head.

So you can't provide support of mass voter fraud either. Ok pookie.