OFFICIAL: Day 3 public hearings game thread
Can't wait for the character assassination and other blabbering nonsense the conservative news drums up and you swallow.
Comments
-
Thud
-
I like this part:
I'd like to address a few brief words to the American people watching at home.
If you watched the impeachment hearings last week, you may have noticed a disconnect between what you actually saw and the mainstream media accounts describing it. What you saw were three diplomats, who dislike the President's Ukraine policy, discussing second-hand and third-hand conversations about their objections. Meanwhile, they admitted they had not talked to the president about these matters, and they were unable to identify any crime or impeachable offense the President committed.
But what you read in the press were accounts of shocking, damning, and explosive testimony that fully supports the Democrats' accusations.
If these accounts have a familiar ring, it's because this is the same preposterous reporting the media offered for three years on the Russia hoax. On a near-daily basis, the top news outlets in America reported breathlessly on the newest bombshell revelations showing that President Trump and everyone surrounding him are Russian agents. It really wasn't long ago that we were reading these headlines:
From CNN:"Congress investigating Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials." That was false.
From the New York Times: "Trump Campaign aides had repeated contacts with Russian intelligence." That was false.
From Slate:"Was a Trump server communicating with Russia?" That was false.
From New York Magazine: "Will Trump be meeting with his counterpart or his handler?" That was false.
From the Guardian: "Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian Embassy, sources say." That was false.
And from Buzzfeed: "President Trump directed his attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the Moscow Tower project." That was false.
There was no objectivity or fairness in the media's Russia stories—just a fevered rush to tarnish and remove a president who refuses to pretend that the media are something different than what they really are—puppets of the Democratic Party.
The part in bold is a list of the Hondo Bros greatest hits. -
Is that from the dude suing a fake cow? It would take someone that spends their time suing a fake cow to accuse a question of being false.
-
Lou Dobbs!!!!GDS said:Is that from the dude suing a fake cow? It would take someone that spends their time suing a fake cow to accuse a question of being false.
How many of those did you swallow like a bitch Scotty? -
Got a link Bob?SFGbob said:I like this part:
I'd like to address a few brief words to the American people watching at home.
If you watched the impeachment hearings last week, you may have noticed a disconnect between what you actually saw and the mainstream media accounts describing it. What you saw were three diplomats, who dislike the President's Ukraine policy, discussing second-hand and third-hand conversations about their objections. Meanwhile, they admitted they had not talked to the president about these matters, and they were unable to identify any crime or impeachable offense the President committed.
But what you read in the press were accounts of shocking, damning, and explosive testimony that fully supports the Democrats' accusations.
If these accounts have a familiar ring, it's because this is the same preposterous reporting the media offered for three years on the Russia hoax. On a near-daily basis, the top news outlets in America reported breathlessly on the newest bombshell revelations showing that President Trump and everyone surrounding him are Russian agents. It really wasn't long ago that we were reading these headlines:
From CNN:"Congress investigating Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials." That was false.
From the New York Times: "Trump Campaign aides had repeated contacts with Russian intelligence." That was false.
From Slate:"Was a Trump server communicating with Russia?" That was false.
From New York Magazine: "Will Trump be meeting with his counterpart or his handler?" That was false.
From the Guardian: "Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian Embassy, sources say." That was false.
And from Buzzfeed: "President Trump directed his attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the Moscow Tower project." That was false.
There was no objectivity or fairness in the media's Russia stories—just a fevered rush to tarnish and remove a president who refuses to pretend that the media are something different than what they really are—puppets of the Democratic Party.
The part in bold is a list of the Hondo Bros greatest hits. -
www.gofuckyourself.com2001400ex said:
Got a link Bob?SFGbob said:I like this part:
I'd like to address a few brief words to the American people watching at home.
If you watched the impeachment hearings last week, you may have noticed a disconnect between what you actually saw and the mainstream media accounts describing it. What you saw were three diplomats, who dislike the President's Ukraine policy, discussing second-hand and third-hand conversations about their objections. Meanwhile, they admitted they had not talked to the president about these matters, and they were unable to identify any crime or impeachable offense the President committed.
But what you read in the press were accounts of shocking, damning, and explosive testimony that fully supports the Democrats' accusations.
If these accounts have a familiar ring, it's because this is the same preposterous reporting the media offered for three years on the Russia hoax. On a near-daily basis, the top news outlets in America reported breathlessly on the newest bombshell revelations showing that President Trump and everyone surrounding him are Russian agents. It really wasn't long ago that we were reading these headlines:
From CNN:"Congress investigating Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials." That was false.
From the New York Times: "Trump Campaign aides had repeated contacts with Russian intelligence." That was false.
From Slate:"Was a Trump server communicating with Russia?" That was false.
From New York Magazine: "Will Trump be meeting with his counterpart or his handler?" That was false.
From the Guardian: "Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian Embassy, sources say." That was false.
And from Buzzfeed: "President Trump directed his attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the Moscow Tower project." That was false.
There was no objectivity or fairness in the media's Russia stories—just a fevered rush to tarnish and remove a president who refuses to pretend that the media are something different than what they really are—puppets of the Democratic Party.
The part in bold is a list of the Hondo Bros greatest hits. -
Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
Why dont you suck his cock?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
insinceredawg said:
Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
I just turned it on and this doesn't look anything like a soldier nor act like one. Just an observation. -
So ID was right.Sledog said:insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
I just turned it on and this doesn't look anything like a soldier nor act like one. Just an observation. -
Fake war hero! Fake Purple Heart! Tune in to Daily Caller for more details on Vindman's true identity!Sledog said:insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
I just turned it on and this doesn't look anything like a soldier nor act like one. Just an observation. -
Never said that but have fun with it. I wouldn't take that guy to a war.insinceredawg said:
Fake war hero! Fake Purple Heart! Tune in to Daily Caller for more details on Vindman's true identity!Sledog said:insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
I just turned it on and this doesn't look anything like a soldier nor act like one. Just an observation. -
Is there any doubt that you would do the same thing if the party colors were flipped?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
I'm waiting for Swalwell to tear off an epic fart!
-
I'd never support or defend a piece of shit like Trump, regardless of party. What you Trumptards don't understand is the reason we hate Trump isn't for partisan reasons, it's cause he's an incompetent unhinged dumbfuck who has no business running a Subway let alone the the most powerful country on the planet. Someday you'll all realize this and then deny you ever supported him in the first place. I'll have to take a lot of screenshots before he's out of office.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is there any doubt that you would do the same thing if the party colors were flipped?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
Obama was the person you describe. Your'e just late.insinceredawg said:
I'd never support or defend a piece of shit like Trump, regardless of party. What you Trumptards don't understand is the reason we hate Trump isn't for partisan reasons, it's cause he's an incompetent unhinged dumbfuck who has no business running a Subway let alone the the most powerful country on the planet. Someday you'll all realize this and then deny you ever supported him in the first place. I'll have to take a lot of screenshots before he's out of office.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is there any doubt that you would do the same thing if the party colors were flipped?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
Yeah, remember how much the left loved Ollie North and John McCain back in 2008.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is there any doubt that you would do the same thing if the party colors were flipped?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
Also, so it's on the record, Trump is a draft dodging piece of shit. Bone spurs my ass.
-
Agreed. Trump was a rich kid who took advantage of the many, many loopholes available to the rich and connected to avoid serving in Vietnam.Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used to for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
Trump prefers his war heros to not have been captured.SFGbob said:
Yeah, remember how much the left loved Ollie North and John McCain back in 2008.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is there any doubt that you would do the same thing if the party colors were flipped?insinceredawg said:Gonna be special when the self proclaimed patriots on the Tug smear a war hero and purple heart recipient to defend the actions of a draft dodging traitor.
-
Pretty broad brush, depending on who you are characterizing as “progressive”. Who specifically are you accusing of this hypocrisy?Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
90% of progressives has been my personal experience.HHusky said:
Pretty broad brush, depending on who you are characterizing as “progressive”. Who specifically are you accusing of this hypocrisy?Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
Would that be like the Rick lefties that call for higher taxes but don't party their "fair share" unless forced by law?SFGbob said:
Agreed. Trump was a rich kid who took advantage of the many, many loopholes available to the rich and connected to avoid serving in Vietnam.Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used to for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
We do have to remember Trump is really a Democrat and was when he dodged the draft just like all the rest of them and Obama's fake draft registration. -
After Vietnam the left had open contempt for the military until after Gulf War I in the early 1990s. That contempt cost them politically and after Gulf War I they jumped on board as BIG supporters of the military. Of course they were lying but they learned that the American public didn't support their hate toward the military.Swaye said:
90% of progressives has been my personal experience.HHusky said:
Pretty broad brush, depending on who you are characterizing as “progressive”. Who specifically are you accusing of this hypocrisy?Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
but but but that 3 year old Politico article
-
Yes, but who specifically are you referring to? Any members of the Committee? Particular poasters? Press?Swaye said:
90% of progressives has been my personal experience.HHusky said:
Pretty broad brush, depending on who you are characterizing as “progressive”. Who specifically are you accusing of this hypocrisy?Swaye said:Always amusing to me that the only time the progressives like the military is when it is being used for their ends. 364 days of the year the progressives wouldn't piss on Vindman if he was on fire, but today, he's a hero.
-
insinceredawg said:
but but but that 3 year old Politico article
Take it up with Politico and the NYTimes.
-
I forgot to add this one to the list of conspiracy theories you've floated on this board. Do you ever stop lying?SFGbob said:insinceredawg said:but but but that 3 year old Politico article
Take it up with Politico and the NYTimes. -
It wasn't so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative's name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party. As Vogel reported, she knew about Paul Manafort's extensive connections to the pro-Russian regime of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, and decided to dig deeper into possible connections between Moscow and the Trump campaign. As part of that effort, she discussed Manafort with the high-ranking officials at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington, D.C.
How's Vindman's ass taste IC?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-ukraine-try-to-interfere-in-the-2016-election/
Btw, Chalupa is another one of the witnesses Schiff is refusing to call or depose.
