Who is she fucking kidding?

2001400ex said:

Does anyone play more stupid games of word semantics than Bob? Haha

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Does anyone play more stupid games of word semantics than Bob? Haha

Does anyone suck more cock than Hondo?

salemcoog said:

TurdBomber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

TurdBomber said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

"But it's really a sad thing. I mean, what the president did was so much worse than even what Richard Nixon did, that at some point Richard Nixon cared about the country enough to recognize that this could not continue," Pelosi said. Mr. Nixon resigned before the House could vote on impeachment.

"...so much worse than what Richard Nixon did" -- worse than watergate. Really?

I think Trump should show up to the hearing and make himself available to ask questions. Risky, yes? He'd knock it out of the park.

You really do not understand the constitution at all.

Another great response from CD. You are so much smarter than us all. We should all pay Derek to be in your presence. Given your party wants to SHRED the constitution and a bunch of amendments to pieces and go full Venezuela, I can't believe you'd refer to that for your "defense."

Explain what part of this hearing is akin to Venezuela.

One side has total control. One side is blocked from participating. Never Had a one party impeachment.

Again your are lying. Each party has equal time for questions.

Republicans are blocked from asking questions Schiff doesn't like. Go fuck yourself Hondo.

Lil lyin Bob.

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

"But it's really a sad thing. I mean, what the president did was so much worse than even what Richard Nixon did, that at some point Richard Nixon cared about the country enough to recognize that this could not continue," Pelosi said. Mr. Nixon resigned before the House could vote on impeachment.

"...so much worse than what Richard Nixon did" -- worse than watergate. Really?

I think Trump should show up to the hearing and make himself available to ask questions. Risky, yes? He'd knock it out of the park.

You really do not understand the constitution at all.

Another great response from CD. You are so much smarter than us all. We should all pay Derek to be in your presence. Given your party wants to SHRED the constitution and a bunch of amendments to pieces and go full Venezuela, I can't believe you'd refer to that for your "defense."

Explain what part of this hearing is akin to Venezuela.

One side has total control. One side is blocked from participating. Never Had a one party impeachment.

Again your are lying. Each party has equal time for questions.

Republicans are blocked from asking questions Schiff doesn't like. Go fuck yourself Hondo.

Lie.

I always knew Hondo was a pathalogical liar.

I didn't think GDS was. I was wrong.

Blob’s statement was a lie. He appreciates the “ass tongue” though

So Schiff hasn't blocked any Republican questions in the closed hearing liar?

Did DNI Coats tell you that cocksucker?

Where did those goalposts go???

It’s been reported questions designed to unmask the whistleblower who is protected by federal law were blocked.

When you read vague things like "It's been reported..." from a HondoBros, you know they're lying.

You could just read it for yourself. You won't.

Link me up with 'identity' or 'anonymity' expressly noted in the federal whistle blower statute.

I think your quarrel is with Senator Grassley.

When Senator Grassley posts on HH, I'll ask him too.

For now, you seem pretty intent on the 'read it yourself' stuff. So I'm simply requesting you link me to what you've read with regard to the whistle blower statute, specific to 'identity' or 'anonymity'.

So you'd like to detour to a point neither side of this impeachment has contested. It will be an interesting issue when and if either side disagrees about it. Until then, not so much.

Detour away. Deflect. Deny.

Same old, H.

If you want to offer a legal opinion shared by no one, feel free. Until then, it's just you wanting to change the subject.

My lights just flickered. Was that a (now former) client of your's getting juiced?

He’s a Union lawyer, no one dies when He fails. And the taxpayer wins.