Fake news. Paying their fair share?

https://about.van.fedex.com/newsroom/statement-from-frederick-w-smith-chairman-and-ceo-of-fedex-corporation/
Hondo and APAG would outraged if the FedEx paid zero. My guess is this won’t move their outrage needed.
https://about.van.fedex.com/newsroom/statement-from-frederick-w-smith-chairman-and-ceo-of-fedex-corporation/
Comments
-
I thought the New York times was failing. Seems to me they are making money.
-
Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
Here's the original article.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/17/business/how-fedex-cut-its-tax-bill-to-0.html -
I knew you’d meltdown2001400ex said:I thought the New York times was failing. Seems to me they are making money.
-
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
Take the bet or shut the fuck up.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
#triggeredpawz said:
Take the bet or shut the fuck up.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
Coward. Take the bet or shut the fuck up.2001400ex said:
#triggeredpawz said:
Take the bet or shut the fuck up.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans. -
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
But compassionate lefties only pay when forced or it benefits them as a massive tax deduction.2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
-
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
Take the bet or shut the fuck up.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
You don’t have an argument. As usual.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will.
Not shocking.
Melted down, as I predicted. That’s the point. -
Another of Hondo's dodges when he has nothing.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
Can you not read this thread. My point is clear. Surprised you don't have a clue either.SFGbob said:
Another of Hondo's dodges when he has nothing.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
I read it, you got your lying ass handed to you.2001400ex said:
Can you not read this thread. My point is clear. Surprised you don't have a clue either.SFGbob said:
Another of Hondo's dodges when he has nothing.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you miss the actual point of the argument. As always.MikeDamone said:
Hondo meltdown. I was right2001400ex said:
Here Mike, I'll post relevant information for you. Maybe you'll read it but I doubt it. Either way, fed ex seems butthurt by facts.MikeDamone said:
As always, you shill for a leftist rag and are a hypocrite. Which was the reason I posted the FedEx comment. It’s like a moth to a flame and I knew you’d prove my point. Leftist shill.2001400ex said:
As always, you miss the entire point of the article and the point of my discussion on the topic. You are better than that MikeMikeDamone said:
It’s easy to understand. Same with Amazon. Same with trump. Right Hondo?2001400ex said:
They are paying the taxes as required by law. How hard is that to understand?WestlinnDuck said:Seems like they aren't paying any income taxes. But like all good leftards, they would if only someone with a gun makes them. They also are typical leftard hypocritical bitches.
Nearly two years after the tax law passed, the windfall to corporations like FedEx is becoming clear. A New York Times analysis of data compiled by Capital IQ shows no statistically meaningful relationship between the size of the tax cut that companies and industries received and the investments they made. If anything, the companies that received the biggest tax cuts increased their capital investment by less, on average, than companies that got smaller cuts.
FedEx’s financial filings show that the law has so far saved it at least $1.6 billion. Its financial filings show it owed no taxes in the 2018 fiscal year overall. Company officials said FedEx paid $2 billion in total federal income taxes over the past 10 years.
As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019. Much of its savings have gone to reward shareholders: FedEx spent more than $2 billion on stock buybacks and dividend increases in the 2019 fiscal year, up from $1.6 billion in 2018, and more than double the amount the company spent on buybacks and dividends in fiscal year 2017.
A spokesman said it was unfair to judge the effect of the tax cuts on investment by looking at year-to-year changes in the company’s capital spending plans.
So you quote the NYTimes article as facts that FedEx is disputing. Brilliant
So FedEx paid taxes. Got it.
Now dig into the NYTimes
Hopefully the debate happens. Doubt it will. -
I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around. -
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around. -
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted. -
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted. -
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted. -
I didn't idiot. I correctly said your tweet had lies.SFGbob said:
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted. -
Pathological fucking liar strikes again:2001400ex said:
I didn't idiot. I correctly said your tweet had lies.SFGbob said:
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted.
Bob hates facts directly from the campaign. But believes a tweet from a random person. Lol -
Wait for it, the lying piece of shit will claim he was taken out of context.SFGbob said:
Pathological fucking liar strikes again:2001400ex said:
I didn't idiot. I correctly said your tweet had lies.SFGbob said:
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted.
Bob hates facts directly from the campaign. But believes a tweet from a random person. Lol -
Where does that say the whole thing is a lie? Or that the campaign statement is completely true? You just posted my quote that supports exactly what I said. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Wait for it, the lying piece of shit will claim he was taken out of context.SFGbob said:
Pathological fucking liar strikes again:2001400ex said:
I didn't idiot. I correctly said your tweet had lies.SFGbob said:
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted.
Bob hates facts directly from the campaign. But believes a tweet from a random person. Lol -
Look at the fucking Kunt dance. I thought you never called the press release "facts" Kunt?2001400ex said:
Where does that say the whole thing is a lie? Or that the campaign statement is completely true? You just posted my quote that supports exactly what I said. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Wait for it, the lying piece of shit will claim he was taken out of context.SFGbob said:
Pathological fucking liar strikes again:2001400ex said:
I didn't idiot. I correctly said your tweet had lies.SFGbob said:
Why did you claim a mayor buttplug campaign press release was a fact Hondo?2001400ex said:
Why you put "facts" in quotes Mike. Care to call out anything in the NY times article as a lie?MikeDamone said:
FedEx disputes the “facts” nytimes presented and challenged Nytimes to discuss it. Which they likely won’t.2001400ex said:
The NY times is pointing out that the tax cuts are sold to promote business investment and job growth. And that's not what's happened. They used Fed ex to show that the tax cuts didn't correlate to future investment and instead went more to stock buybacks. Fed ex got butthurt at facts and hit NY times on facts, which are funny, but not related to the point that the NY times was hitting at.GrundleStiltzkin said:I don't know what the point of all this bullshit is.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
And the tax code game is the most byzantine around.
And Hondo melted down as predicted.
Bob hates facts directly from the campaign. But believes a tweet from a random person. Lol
Identify for us the "lies" in the Tweet Hondo?