Would you prefer college football return to the bowls-only era?
Comments
-
Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff formatHouhusky said:
Anyone paying mild attention understands that international soccer is full boner, competitive, open free market capitalist based.PurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
I enjoy a bunch of anti capitalist shit tier countries embracing the raw capitalist competitive system.
The commie stuff was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek. Relax. Don’t be so sensitive and easily triggered J.
If your response is some obscure soccer related rage commie copypasta. Then woosh me.
Look at all the obese Cousin-fucking Trump trash run to defend their precious protectionist markets.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turboPurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America! -
The international soccer open market system >>> any dreck US monopoly sports systemPurpleJ said:Houhusky said:
Anyone paying mild attention understands that international soccer is full boner, competitive, open free market capitalist based.PurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
I enjoy a bunch of anti capitalist shit tier countries embracing the raw capitalist competitive system.
The commie stuff was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek. Relax. Don’t be so sensitive and easily triggered J.
If your response is some obscure soccer related rage commie copypasta. Then woosh me.
Look at all the obese Cousin-fucking Trump trash run to defend their precious protectionist markets.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turboPurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
Which is a big part why soccer is more popular worldwide despite the shit sport.
JFC you're on the rag today. -
Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format
Do I have to spoon feed you ? Like @MikeDamone caregiver 10 years from now?Houhusky said:
The international soccer open market system >>> any dreck US monopoly sports systemPurpleJ said:Houhusky said:
Anyone paying mild attention understands that international soccer is full boner, competitive, open free market capitalist based.PurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
I enjoy a bunch of anti capitalist shit tier countries embracing the raw capitalist competitive system.
The commie stuff was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek. Relax. Don’t be so sensitive and easily triggered J.
If your response is some obscure soccer related rage commie copypasta. Then woosh me.
Look at all the obese Cousin-fucking Trump trash run to defend their precious protectionist markets.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turboPurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
Which is a big part why soccer is more popular worldwide despite the shit sport.
JFC you're on the rag today. -
Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format
10 years from now? More like 10 years ago.PurpleJ said:
Do I have to spoon feed you ? Like @MikeDamone caregiver 10 years from now?Houhusky said:
The international soccer open market system >>> any dreck US monopoly sports systemPurpleJ said:Houhusky said:
Anyone paying mild attention understands that international soccer is full boner, competitive, open free market capitalist based.PurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
I enjoy a bunch of anti capitalist shit tier countries embracing the raw capitalist competitive system.
The commie stuff was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek. Relax. Don’t be so sensitive and easily triggered J.
If your response is some obscure soccer related rage commie copypasta. Then woosh me.
Look at all the obese Cousin-fucking Trump trash run to defend their precious protectionist markets.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turboPurpleJ said:My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.
It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
Which is a big part why soccer is more popular worldwide despite the shit sport.
JFC you're on the rag today. -
Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format
Um, the CFB playoff is entirely ESPN driven.RoadDawg55 said:The BCS was stupid because it was ESPN driven. It would have been nice to see the Pete Carroll USC teams get some more cracks at winning a title.
The playoff is fun. Like others have said, it needs to be 8 teams. There is a way to still have the real bowl games mean something and have a true champion. -
No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoffNot surprising 60 percent of doogs want to go back to pre BCS era. They'd rather have worthless voted half natties than to have to win it on the field
-
No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoffKeep the playoff system at four teams to keep it elite. Auto bids for conference champions is dumb. Having only 4 spots ensures only the teams who play the best ball are represented in the final four at the end of the season. It's a big motivation factor.
-
No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
You don't even know what fun and joy is you miserable pile of horse shit.MikeDamone said:Fuck this abortion they have now. It’s as if they purposely devised a plan to suck all the fun and joy out of college football
-
No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
I’ll go one further obk and watch my post get buried as well, I wouldn’t expect any different outcome on most PAC message boreds to this pole including here.... Ask this same question/pole on most any other P5 school message bored other than PAC 10’s. Would be vastly different outcome on most of the other P5 forums. There’s reasons for this hate.oregonblitzkrieg said:Not surprising 60 percent of doogs want to go back to pre BCS era. They'd rather have worthless voted half natties than to have to win it on the field
And I’ll say here, Bama is most likely done. Tua gone. Just win out. -
No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
UW fans know their program has virtually no chance to ever win a championship on the field. Hell, they can't even get onto that field to try, and haven't in their program's 130 year history. Makes sense that inferior programs would want to go back to the good old days of heavily biased voting and no true championship game, which favored programs like USC.SECDAWG said:
I’ll go one further obk and watch my post get buried as well, I wouldn’t expect any different outcome on most PAC message boreds to this pole including here.... Ask this same question/pole on most any other P5 school message bored other than PAC 10’s. Would be vastly different outcome on most of the other P5 forums. There’s reasons for this hate.oregonblitzkrieg said:Not surprising 60 percent of doogs want to go back to pre BCS era. They'd rather have worthless voted half natties than to have to win it on the field





