Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Would you prefer college football return to the bowls-only era?

124678

Comments

  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,042 Standard Supporter
    No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff

    Here's some bull shit piece from 2016 on Fox (sports is your source?) of a 24 team "super conference". Oregon, Stanford UCLA and UW out. Lol.

    You'd have to add UW to the West along with either ASU or Utah.


    Wow, that’s some serious recency bias right there Fox.
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,042 Standard Supporter
    No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
    Swaye said:

    If you voted for the playoff you are probably queer.

    I do love men.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
    Swaye said:

    If you voted for the playoff you are probably queer.

    Going backwards to the bowl system would be pretty gay. Just make the playoff better. More great games is a good thing.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
    NEsnake12 said:

    To add: Adam Jude was an AP voter up until last year. Adam fucking Jude would’ve had a 1/65th say in crowning a national champion. No thanks

    Right now Ty is one of a lot less than 65 choosing the teams that play for the national championship. There will always be idiots who don’t belong voting.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014

    Here's some bull shit piece from 2016 on Fox (sports is your source?) of a 24 team "super conference". Oregon, Stanford UCLA and UW out. Lol.

    You'd have to add UW to the West along with either ASU or Utah.


    Wow, that’s some serious recency bias right there Fox.
    But that still doesn't explain UCLA
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793
    No, I like what they're trying to do to crown a true champion with a playoff
    I want an 8 team playoff. Make the NY6 bowls part of it, and let the also rans go to the non NY6 bowls.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,748 Founders Club
    Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format

    I used to be #TeamPlayoff, but now I’m nostalgic for the old system. That being said, I can’t see how reverting back would work.

    This describes my point of view perfectly
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,771
    Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format
    My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.

    It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    PurpleJ said:

    My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.

    It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!

    Anyone paying mild attention understands that international soccer is full boner, competitive, open free market capitalist based.

    I enjoy a bunch of anti capitalist shit tier countries embracing the raw capitalist competitive system.

    The commie stuff was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek. Relax. Don’t be so sensitive and easily triggered J.

    If your response is some obscure soccer related rage commie copypasta. Then woosh me.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Yes, I liked it the way it was before the BCS and playoff format
    PurpleJ said:

    My favorite part of this thread was the people that equate promotion/relegation with communism/socialism, just because it is used in Europe. It’s actually used throughout the world, but I digress.

    It is purely merit based so...like...uhhhh....the polar opposite of commie shit you crayon eating fucktards. And one more thing...the professional teams over there are privately owned and don’t operate on a protectionist franchise model like our? leagues. There is no salary cap or revenue sharing or draft. Make money, win, scout better, get a rich ownership group and better sponsorship deals or fuck off and go play in the little leagues. Only in America do they let the losers get first pick in the draft and remain in the big leagues. The NFL even gives them an easier schedule the next year. Bunch of red fucking commie losers in America!

    Calm down turbo