Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Stats are for losers fupdate
Comments
-
NavyPostGameOrangeSlices said:
This team cant beat shit on a neutral field.YellowSnow said:
We suck, until we don't PGOS. That's not the point. But I count 7 or 8 teams in the AP Top 25 that we would beat 81% of the time on an neutral field.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No we arent. We cant even close out against shit teams in our conference. 35 sounds about rightYellowSnow said:
I don't think FPI is too off the mark. This team - in spite of all its warts - is still probably about 20 to 25th best in the country.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Sap + always over ranks us. The computers must like baffling incompetence
Iowa
Indiana
Boise State
Memphis
Cincinatti
I think we could handle any of them. Guess we'll find out in the @GrundleStiltzkin Bowl.
-
Iowa would beat us like a rented mule
-
No shame in losing to a Doog legend I suppose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Iowa would beat us like a rented mule
-
They always seem to do well in their mid tier bowl games. Beat SEC last yearYellowSnow said:
No shame in losing to a Doog legend I suppose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Iowa would beat us like a rented mule
-
I know the reaction to this is UW too high, but maybe this should be thought of as more of an indictment on the coaches than anything. Says a lot about the game management that our record is where it is.YellowSnow said: -
I said this in another thread but in 2016 we were 2 c-hairs away from no CFP appearance. This year we are 10 pts from 8-1 and looking better than we really are. Football is a weird game and sometimes the ball bounces your way and sometimes it doesn't. Might as well rip the band off and expose stubborn ass Pete to the concept that he's not the smartest guy in the room.jhfstyle24 said:
I know the reaction to this is UW too high, but maybe this should be thought of as more of an indictment on the coaches than anything. Says a lot about the game management that our record is where it is.YellowSnow said: -
We have been inflated in these polls since Pete came on board. Computers like us because we keep damn near every game close. Lovable try hard losers that would probably miraculously keep the game within 7 at Bama or Clemson, but only win 1 out of 100 timesjhfstyle24 said:
I know the reaction to this is UW too high, but maybe this should be thought of as more of an indictment on the coaches than anything. Says a lot about the game management that our record is where it is.YellowSnow said: -
BullshitPostGameOrangeSlices said:Iowa would beat us like a rented mule
-
Maybe if you only look at player talent.YellowSnow said:
I don't think FPI is too off the mark. This team - in spite of all its warts - is still probably about 20 to 25th best in the country.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Sap + always over ranks us. The computers must like baffling incompetence
But with our coaching staff we are more like 40 to 45th best in the country. -
Youre right. We'd probably rally late and lose by 1 after missing a PAT and a field goal earlierRaceBannon said:
BullshitPostGameOrangeSlices said:Iowa would beat us like a rented mule
