Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2020 Schedule

Because I am bored as fuck and the TSIO, I wanted to look ahead to next year. I looked when the last few Pac-12 schedules were released and found the 2018 schedule was released on 11/16/17 and the 2019 schedule was released on 12/4/18. So it looks like in the next 5 weeks we will see what our schedule will be and we can all start dooging.

Next year we have 7 Home games and 5 on the road

H - Michigan (9/5), Sacramento St. (9/12), Utah St. (9/19), Arizona, Colorado, Oregon St., Stanford

R - Cal, Oregon, USC, Utah, WSU (11/27)

Out of the 12 games it looks like UW will be seeing 8 new QB's. Those teams are Michigan, Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, OSU, USC, Utah, and WSU. Sac St. and Utah St. will return their starters while the only Pac-12 teams we face to return their starters are Stanford (Mills) and Cal (Garbers). We will see 4 new starters out of the 8 on the road. I think this is huge because as much as our D has gone through its lumps they will be much better next year.

A few things I would like to see but I know we won't get.

- A bye before we go on the road to either Oregon or USC. The Pac-12 owes us.
- I want one of our byes before week 6. This year was 9 & 12 which definitely hurt us. 2018 was week 11. 2017 was week 8. That is unacceptable by the conference.

PS - The playoff locations next year are the Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl. If Skinny comes back we will be playing in the Rose Bowl. If not, we will be playing in the
Denny's $5 Grand Slam Bowl in Topeka, Kansas. Go Dawgs!!
«13

Comments

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,691 Founders Club

    Because I am bored as fuck and the TSIO, I wanted to look ahead to next year. I looked when the last few Pac-12 schedules were released and found the 2018 schedule was released on 11/16/17 and the 2019 schedule was released on 12/4/18. So it looks like in the next 5 weeks we will see what our schedule will be and we can all start dooging.

    Next year we have 7 Home games and 5 on the road

    H - Michigan (9/5), Sacramento St. (9/12), Utah St. (9/19), Arizona, Colorado, Oregon St., Stanford

    R - Cal, Oregon, USC, Utah, WSU (11/27)

    Out of the 12 games it looks like UW will be seeing 8 new QB's. Those teams are Michigan, Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, OSU, USC, Utah, and WSU. Sac St. and Utah St. will return their starters while the only Pac-12 teams we face to return their starters are Stanford (Mills) and Cal (Garbers). We will see 4 new starters out of the 8 on the road. I think this is huge because as much as our D has gone through its lumps they will be much better next year.

    A few things I would like to see but I know we won't get.

    - A bye before we go on the road to either Oregon or USC. The Pac-12 owes us.
    - I want one of our byes before week 6. This year was 9 & 12 which definitely hurt us. 2018 was week 11. 2017 was week 8. That is unacceptable by the conference.

    PS - The playoff locations next year are the Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl. If Skinny comes back we will be playing in the Rose Bowl. If not, we will be playing in the
    Denny's $5 Grand Slam Bowl in Topeka, Kansas. Go Dawgs!!

    The fact that every team but USC has 2 byes this year and UW didn’t get their first bye until week 9 didn’t do us any favors. I doubt having the bye earlier would’ve helped as Pete’s too goddamn stubborn to change his ways but you never know.

    Jon Wilner has been beating the scheduling drum for a couple years now about the conference not helping itself but what do you expect when you hire a guy whose previous experience was in women’s tennis?
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    The DL and DB have a lot of future potential, BUT, the defense upper bound is capped so hard because of the ILB play.

    The likelihood ILB is solved in the off season seems rather low, its going to take multiple true freshman currently red-shirting being ready to start next year. Which is hard to believe, because if they will be ready to play up to an appropriate level next year than they are probably close enough right now and should have played this year.

    If Eason doesnt come back the offense is going to get worse. Getting Newton, Mcgrew, and Puka back from injury and a full season out of them will help. Actually playing the young (better) WRs will soften the blow a decent amount. I think the best thing you can hope for is the offense stays about the same but becomes more efficient on 3rd down.

    So most likely, next year, the defense will improve a small amount but still struggle because of young/poor ILB play and the offense overall isnt quiet as good but is able to make up the loss of Eason by figuring out how to not plunger themselves on 3rd down.

    10-3

    Loses to Michigan, Oregon, USC
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,460 Founders Club
    It's the tuffest road league schedule you can get but we suck at home so it's all good
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795
    It’s the exact same road schedule we had last season, just swapping which LA school we play
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,460 Founders Club
    NEsnake12 said:

    It’s the exact same road schedule we had last season, just swapping which LA school we play

    We went 3 and 2 on the road in conference but still won the league last year

    3 home league losses this year. So far. Only a road loss at Stanford which might as well be Bama when we play there

    Good teams win anywhere and we will need to be good to not get into a shitty spiral of doom again
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,555 Swaye's Wigwam
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,222
    Utah St likely will have a new QB ... good chance he goes pro because depending on who you listen to for draft rankings he's rated as having more upside than Skinny

    I wouldn't be convinced that Skinny's leaving yet ... he's going to get absolutely hammered by the NFL in their evaluation with respect to pocket awareness and throwing against pressure. You don't get better at that per se by running drills as a backup at the NFL level.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited November 2019
    Tequilla said:

    Utah St likely will have a new QB ... good chance he goes pro because depending on who you listen to for draft rankings he's rated as having more upside than Skinny

    I wouldn't be convinced that Skinny's leaving yet ... he's going to get absolutely hammered by the NFL in their evaluation with respect to pocket awareness and throwing against pressure. You don't get better at that per se by running drills as a backup at the NFL level.


    In hand; he probably has a top 25 overall pick secured.

    If he comes back; he could play his way into a top 5 overall pick OR play poorly and likely still get drafted in the middle or late second round.


    2017:

    Trubitsky (2) : 29 million
    Mahomes (10) : 16 million
    Watson (12): 14 million
    Kizer (52): 5 million (3 guaranteed)
    Webb (87): Less than Jake Browning got.

    2018:

    Mayfield (1) : 33 million
    Darnold (2): 30 million
    Allen (7): 21 million
    Rosen (10): 18 million
    Jackson (32): 9 million (7.5 guaranteed)
    Rudolph (76): 4 million (1 guaranteed)

    Taking that data and running it through a very basic and rough trend-line...





    In theory and very roughly... and not taking into account things like yearly increasing contracts or anything...

    IF Eason is drafted around 5 he will get around 21 million
    IF Eason is drafted around 25 he will get around 10 million
    IF Eason is drafted around 45 he will get around 6 million
    IF Eason is drafted around 60 he will get around 4 million

    Coming back... I think you could say that Eason could "lose" 4 million OR "gain" 11 million OR anything in between... IDK, Im sure some gambling addict/expert like @DHD could logic out the appropriate risk/reward calculation.