Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Amash for President?

12346

Comments

  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    He's a conservative libertarian.

    Libertarian <> liberal
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    USMChawk said:


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    We know Trump’s not a conservative. You know what else he’s not? Hillary.
    he manipulates markets in particular -- anti free trade. That is the kind of shit they do big time in Venezuela!
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.

    The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it

    Dumbest narrative ever
    No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.

    Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/
    Speaking of liars, where are Tulsi's words, asshole.? #GDSParrot
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,533 Standard Supporter


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.

    Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.

  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.

    Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.

    there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,533 Standard Supporter


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.

    Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.

    there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)
    First, your reading comprehension sucks.

    Second, once again you're proving your ignorance of history which the esteemed @YellowSnow respects.

    Because you want to act like a petulant child and stamp your feet on revisionism doesn't change the fact that what you consider 'liberalism' isn't.

    Spend some time boning up on Locke, the Scottish Enlightenment, the letters of Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine and Alex Toquerville before you open your yap about shit you literally know zip about.




  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.

    Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.

    there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)
    First, your reading comprehension sucks.

    Second, once again you're proving your ignorance of history which the esteemed @YellowSnow respects.

    Because you want to act like a petulant child and stamp your feet on revisionism doesn't change the fact that what you consider 'liberalism' isn't.

    Spend some time boning up on Locke, the Scottish Enlightenment, the letters of Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine and Alex Toquerville before you open your yap about shit you literally know zip about.




    I don't have to. Only a complete idiot would conflate a modern day liberal and a modern day libertarian. They are on opposite poles dumbfuck. We aren't living in the motherfucking Scottish Enlightenment or any other enlightenment. Join the fucking 21st century dumbass
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    *classical liberal

    Sounds like I’d have your vote
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.

    The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it

    Dumbest narrative ever
    No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.

    Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/
    Speaking of liars, where are Tulsi's words, asshole.? #GDSParrot

    He'll never answer. Like most leftists he is pure Kunt.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
    Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.

    Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.

    Not really. Modern day conservatives have deviate quite a bit for classical liberals. Particularly when it comes to religion.

    Conservatives today are even miles apart from those is the 60s and 70s. But to be fair, a democrat “progressive” in 1960 wouldn’t get elected mayor running as a democratic today’s.