Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Amash for President?

12357

Comments

  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    edited November 2019
    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    You are making too much sense for this shithole, GDS. Trumptards don't like facts, and laws, or if they do, it is only some of the facts and the laws. It's better just to hang around here if you like studying how the stupid mind works (that was not smart enough and disciplined enough to graduate college -- Trump is most popular with white guys who just have a high school diploma).
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,531 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.

    The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it

    Dumbest narrative ever
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.

    The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it

    Dumbest narrative ever
    Can't wait for the public hearings you bitched about.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.

    The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it

    Dumbest narrative ever
    No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.

    Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties.
    Agree. This will be the story of 2020. The dims losing both the House, and the Presidency for another 4 years. Keep digging that hole deeper.
    It could be. Which is why impeachment is politically dangerous even if the facts are on your side. Barr won the messaging battle about the Mueller report and Dems fucked it up.
    You are correct in that the impeachment proceedings are pure politics. It is a production that the public will tire of sooner than later once the attempted revolution is televised.

    You can only fuck with the people’s The Price is Right and The Young and the Restless so many times before they will turn on you.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,679

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    I stand with race
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2019


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,702 Founders Club


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    "Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?

    Making I’m making progress here.
    I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)
    We know Trump’s not a conservative. You know what else he’s not? Hillary.