Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Amash for President?

24

Comments

  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for Trump
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited November 2019
    Sounds like Amash wants to run cover for Schmoe Biden's so called 'whistleblower.' Release this asshole's name, they already know he's one of Biden's guys.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its political


    Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.

    So yeah shut the fuck up
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,757
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    Christ! Give it up you sub-90 IQ moron. Impeachment is for "High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

    Oh, but it's just a "political process."

    Kill yourself, now. Quit wasting everyone's time.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,757
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    OK Faggot. Show me those Tulsi words that show her "soft spot" for Assad, POS Parrot.
  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for Trump
    I'd have to lose 99% of my working neurons (like you) first.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Where's Hunter?
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its political


    Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.

    So yeah shut the fuck up
    It’s mind boggling you are so dumb you don’t understand how the process works. If the public supports it you could impeach a president for wearing green socks.

    Barr was right. Trump’s base of Trumptards like you were never going to read the report and don’t give two shits what’s in it. He pushed no collusion, no obstruction for a month and by the time the public actually got the report no one cared and had moved on. The Dems hoped by calling Mueller to testify they could shift public attention back to the Contents of the report but he wasn’t a very compelling witness and support for impeachment stayed in the high 30’s which was never going to move the needle.

    The public seems so far to understand the Ukraine situation better and the timing has been condensed which is why public support for it is up around 50. Hence why this is progressing while the Mueller report which most will never read didn’t.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,757
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    It's mind-boggling that you would think anyone give a fuck what you think, you worthless parrot @GDS.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    No one except Bezos Post, NY Times subscribers are going to support the narrative that partisan dims are pushing on Ukraine when Schmoe Biden is on camera boasting about shaking down the Ukranian leadership and making them fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt business dealings with Burisma. He was using American taxpayer dollars as a bargaining chip in his extortion attempt.

    Where's Hunter?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for Trump
    I'd have to lose 99% of my working neurons (like you) first.
    What are the major policy differences?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its political


    Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.

    So yeah shut the fuck up
    It’s mind boggling you are so dumb you don’t understand how the process works. If the public supports it you could impeach a president for wearing green socks.

    Barr was right. Trump’s base of Trumptards like you were never going to read the report and don’t give two shits what’s in it. He pushed no collusion, no obstruction for a month and by the time the public actually got the report no one cared and had moved on. The Dems hoped by calling Mueller to testify they could shift public attention back to the Contents of the report but he wasn’t a very compelling witness and support for impeachment stayed in the high 30’s which was never going to move the needle.

    The public seems so far to understand the Ukraine situation better and the timing has been condensed which is why public support for it is up around 50. Hence why this is progressing while the Mueller report which most will never read didn’t.
    Delusional

    And stupid

    Nice combination
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    No one except Bezos Post, NY Times subscribers are going to support the narrative that partisan dims are pushing on Ukraine when Schmoe Biden is on camera boasting about shaking down the Ukranian leadership and making them fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt business dealings with Burisma. He was using American taxpayer dollars as a bargaining chip in his extortion attempt.

    Where's Hunter?

    Biden confessed
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,770
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,757
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    Nothing "changes" the narrative in your mind. It's whatever MSNBC or CNN send out on the ticker, sieve.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,757
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    GDS said:


    Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.
    The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?

    No it doesn't. You have that going for you

    Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work

    Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott

    But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing

    That's the ticket
    Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.

    You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
    How pathetic is it when a shitpoaster shamelessly and desperately plagiarizes their opposition?

    It's @GDS pathetic is what it is. Always finding new depths of shitpoasting.
Sign In or Register to comment.