Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Amash for President?
Comments
-
No one except Bezos Post, NY Times subscribers are going to support the narrative that partisan dims are pushing on Ukraine when Schmoe Biden is on camera boasting about shaking down the Ukranian leadership and making them fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt business dealings with Burisma. He was using American taxpayer dollars as a bargaining chip in his extortion attempt.
Where's Hunter? -
What are the major policy differences?ApostleofGrief said:
I'd have to lose 99% of my working neurons (like you) first.RaceBannon said:
If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for TrumpApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit). -
DelusionalGDS said:
It’s mind boggling you are so dumb you don’t understand how the process works. If the public supports it you could impeach a president for wearing green socks.RaceBannon said:
We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its politicalGDS said:
OK BoomerRaceBannon said:
Just shut the fuck upGDS said:
What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.RaceBannon said:
If the proof is there what difference does it make?GDS said:
Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.RaceBannon said:
Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?GDS said:Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.
That is horrible spin
Remarkably horrible
The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.
So yeah shut the fuck up
Barr was right. Trump’s base of Trumptards like you were never going to read the report and don’t give two shits what’s in it. He pushed no collusion, no obstruction for a month and by the time the public actually got the report no one cared and had moved on. The Dems hoped by calling Mueller to testify they could shift public attention back to the Contents of the report but he wasn’t a very compelling witness and support for impeachment stayed in the high 30’s which was never going to move the needle.
The public seems so far to understand the Ukraine situation better and the timing has been condensed which is why public support for it is up around 50. Hence why this is progressing while the Mueller report which most will never read didn’t.
And stupid
Nice combination -
-
Biden confessedoregonblitzkrieg said:No one except Bezos Post, NY Times subscribers are going to support the narrative that partisan dims are pushing on Ukraine when Schmoe Biden is on camera boasting about shaking down the Ukranian leadership and making them fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt business dealings with Burisma. He was using American taxpayer dollars as a bargaining chip in his extortion attempt.
Where's Hunter? -
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
-
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket -
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath? -
Nothing "changes" the narrative in your mind. It's whatever MSNBC or CNN send out on the ticker, sieve.GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said: -
How pathetic is it when a shitpoaster shamelessly and desperately plagiarizes their opposition?GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
It's @GDS pathetic is what it is. Always finding new depths of shitpoasting. -
You are making too much sense for this shithole, GDS. Trumptards don't like facts, and laws, or if they do, it is only some of the facts and the laws. It's better just to hang around here if you like studying how the stupid mind works (that was not smart enough and disciplined enough to graduate college -- Trump is most popular with white guys who just have a high school diploma).GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
-
Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it
Dumbest narrative ever -
Can't wait for the public hearings you bitched about.RaceBannon said:
Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it
Dumbest narrative ever -
No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.RaceBannon said:
Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it
Dumbest narrative ever
Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/ -
You are correct in that the impeachment proceedings are pure politics. It is a production that the public will tire of sooner than later once the attempted revolution is televised.GDS said:
It could be. Which is why impeachment is politically dangerous even if the facts are on your side. Barr won the messaging battle about the Mueller report and Dems fucked it up.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. This will be the story of 2020. The dims losing both the House, and the Presidency for another 4 years. Keep digging that hole deeper.GDS said:
Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties.RaceBannon said:
If the proof is there what difference does it make?GDS said:
Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.RaceBannon said:
Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?GDS said:Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.
That is horrible spin
Remarkably horrible
The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
You can only fuck with the people’s The Price is Right and The Young and the Restless so many times before they will turn on you.
Good luck the rest of the way. -
I stand with raceRaceBannon said:
Just shut the fuck upGDS said:
What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.RaceBannon said:
If the proof is there what difference does it make?GDS said:
Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.RaceBannon said:
Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?GDS said:Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.
That is horrible spin
Remarkably horrible
The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia -
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here. -
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
-
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here. -
We know Trump’s not a conservative. You know what else he’s not? Hillary.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here. -
He's a conservative libertarian.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Libertarian <> liberal -
he manipulates markets in particular -- anti free trade. That is the kind of shit they do big time in Venezuela!USMChawk said:
We know Trump’s not a conservative. You know what else he’s not? Hillary.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here. -
Speaking of liars, where are Tulsi's words, asshole.? #GDSParrotGDS said:
No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.RaceBannon said:
Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it
Dumbest narrative ever
Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/ -
Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.
-
there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)PurpleThrobber said:
Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice. -
First, your reading comprehension sucks.ApostleofGrief said:
there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)PurpleThrobber said:
Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.
Second, once again you're proving your ignorance of history which the esteemed @YellowSnow respects.
Because you want to act like a petulant child and stamp your feet on revisionism doesn't change the fact that what you consider 'liberalism' isn't.
Spend some time boning up on Locke, the Scottish Enlightenment, the letters of Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine and Alex Toquerville before you open your yap about shit you literally know zip about.
-
I don't have to. Only a complete idiot would conflate a modern day liberal and a modern day libertarian. They are on opposite poles dumbfuck. We aren't living in the motherfucking Scottish Enlightenment or any other enlightenment. Join the fucking 21st century dumbassPurpleThrobber said:
First, your reading comprehension sucks.ApostleofGrief said:
there is a huge difference. You know it. For starters liberals do all kinds of social engineering. Libertarians are laissez faire (forget spelling)PurpleThrobber said:
Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.
Second, once again you're proving your ignorance of history which the esteemed @YellowSnow respects.
Because you want to act like a petulant child and stamp your feet on revisionism doesn't change the fact that what you consider 'liberalism' isn't.
Spend some time boning up on Locke, the Scottish Enlightenment, the letters of Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine and Alex Toquerville before you open your yap about shit you literally know zip about. -
*classical liberalApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Sounds like I’d have your vote -
TurdBomber said:
Speaking of liars, where are Tulsi's words, asshole.? #GDSParrotGDS said:
No it’s not but releasing transcripts is releasing transcripts.RaceBannon said:
Leaking what they want isn't a transcript.GDS said:
Slow down turbo. A lot of strawman fucking here.RaceBannon said:
The dumbest narrative in the history of the website?GDS said:
Ok. 41% instead of high 30’s. Doesn’t change the narrative.RaceBannon said:
No it doesn't. You have that going for you
Trump colluded with Russia and Mueller proved it but no one read the report so the Democrats are forced to make up a Ukraine scandal that ensnared their front runner because this time it will work
Evidence so damming it is held in secret and fed by leaks to gullible morons like Scott
But the public is buying in this time. No report to read or evidence to hear in a public hearing
That's the ticket
You realize they are releasing transcripts of the testimony and there will be public hearings. If the democrats just “made this up” are all the witnesses testifying with facts negative for Trump in on the conspiracy and lying while under oath?
The Democrats have made everything up. Everyone knows it
Dumbest narrative ever
Here are the released transcripts. Are they all lying?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/05/trump-impeachment-witness-testimony-transcripts/4163983002/
He'll never answer. Like most leftists he is pure Kunt. -
Not really. Modern day conservatives have deviate quite a bit for classical liberals. Particularly when it comes to religion.PurpleThrobber said:
Technically, both conservatives and liberals are 'classic liberals' in the sense they both derive from the thinking of John Locke.YellowSnow said:
"Classical Conservative" is an oxymoron. Amash is a "classical liberal".ApostleofGrief said:
I'd vote for any sane person for president over Trump, but Amash is classical conservative (a real, not faux one like the Trumpublicans)MikeDamone said:
But just the other day you HondoBros said he was far right. Now you’d vote for a classical liberal?ApostleofGrief said:
by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."MikeDamone said:
That's just the socially acceptable version.
I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
Making I’m making progress here.
Then it turns into a split like the Catholics and the Protestants. Both Christians, but divergent in their practice.
Conservatives today are even miles apart from those is the 60s and 70s. But to be fair, a democrat “progressive” in 1960 wouldn’t get elected mayor running as a democratic today’s.
