Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Amash for President?

MikeDamone
MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HRYK
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,237 Founders Club
    I'm in. I need a name to write in my WA ballot in 2020.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    First elected to Congress as a tea party candidate. So racist


    Opposes abortion

    Voted against a balanced budget amendment

    Supported leaving the Paris Accord

    Climate change skeptic

    Against the EPA

    Voted against clean water in Flint calling it a state issue

    Has a Twitter account

    Just some wiki highlights
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    First elected to Congress as a tea party candidate. So racist


    Opposes abortion

    Voted against a balanced budget amendment

    Supported leaving the Paris Accord

    Climate change skeptic

    Against the EPA

    Voted against clean water in Flint calling it a state issue

    Has a Twitter account

    Just some wiki highlights

    2001400ex said:

    HRYK

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    First elected to Congress as a tea party candidate. So racist


    Opposes abortion

    Voted against a balanced budget amendment

    Supported leaving the Paris Accord

    Climate change skeptic

    Against the EPA

    Voted against clean water in Flint calling it a state issue

    Has a Twitter account

    Just some wiki highlights

    The balance budget amendment was twash.

    https://www.cbpp.org/research/amash-constitutional-spending-cap-would-radically-shrink-federal-budget
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,237 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    First elected to Congress as a tea party candidate. So racist


    Opposes abortion

    Voted against a balanced budget amendment

    Supported leaving the Paris Accord

    Climate change skeptic

    Against the EPA

    Voted against clean water in Flint calling it a state issue

    Has a Twitter account

    Just some wiki highlights

    You told me I had to be Ok with politicians twatting so I’ve come to accept it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited November 2019
    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Christ
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    Fucking pathetic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    RaceBannon said:

    First elected to Congress as a tea party candidate. So racist


    Opposes abortion

    Voted against a balanced budget amendment

    Supported leaving the Paris Accord

    Climate change skeptic

    Against the EPA

    Voted against clean water in Flint calling it a state issue

    Has a Twitter account

    Just some wiki highlights

    #ThatsMyPresident
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties.
    Agree. This will be the story of 2020. The dims losing both the House, and the Presidency for another 4 years. Keep digging that hole deeper.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties.
    Agree. This will be the story of 2020. The dims losing both the House, and the Presidency for another 4 years. Keep digging that hole deeper.
    It could be. Which is why impeachment is politically dangerous even if the facts are on your side. Barr won the messaging battle about the Mueller report and Dems fucked it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    MikeDamone said:


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Mike Damone and Hondo Bro AOG have things in common...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2019
    You mean this 'whistleblower?'

    "We also now know the name of the whistleblower. The whistleblower needs to come forward as a material witness because he worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs."

    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/469156-paul-says-he-probably-will-disclose-whistleblowers-name
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    ApostleofGrief said:

    MikeDamone said:


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for Trump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2019
    Sounds like Amash wants to run cover for Schmoe Biden's so called 'whistleblower.' Release this asshole's name, they already know he's one of Biden's guys.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,816 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its political


    Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.

    So yeah shut the fuck up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    Christ! Give it up you sub-90 IQ moron. Impeachment is for "High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

    Oh, but it's just a "political process."

    Kill yourself, now. Quit wasting everyone's time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    OK Faggot. Show me those Tulsi words that show her "soft spot" for Assad, POS Parrot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    RaceBannon said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    MikeDamone said:


    by "Trump Republicans" he means "Trumptard."

    That's just the socially acceptable version.

    I'd vote for Amash. He understands the office of the president -- to faithfully execute the laws (not make up his own shit).
    If you'd vote for amash you'd vote for Trump
    I'd have to lose 99% of my working neurons (like you) first.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Where's Hunter?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    Give him credit for actually reading the mueller report and speaking truth to power about it’s contents. As crazy as it is that qualifies as courageous in the 2019 GOP.

    Sure. Why isn't the Muellertard report the basis for impeachment?
    Because Barr usurped the narrative for 4 weeks and Mueller’s testimony was as exciting as watching paint dry. Impeachment is a political process not a criminal trial.
    If the proof is there what difference does it make?

    That is horrible spin

    Remarkably horrible

    The proof is there but we don't want to use it so instead we'll do this whole whistleblower thing that nobody is following after promising for two years that Trump colluded with Russia
    What difference does it make? You really that stupid? Ultimately impeachment is political. If the public doesn’t support it there’s no way it can really proceed without the the party pushing impeachment taking massive casualties. Barr knew that and thus pushed his misleading letter knowing the public wouldn’t actually read the report weeks later when it was released. He figured the initial take (his in this case) would dominate the narrative for a month and it would blunt the blow. He was right. Mueller disagreed with how he handled it but it didn’t matter as Barr gave Trump all the cover he needed. Something like 2% of people actually read it.
    Just shut the fuck up

    OK Boomer
    We said Trump colluded with Russia and proved it but Mueller was boring so we're going with this obscure whistleblower thing instead because its political


    Seriously dude you made the dumbest post in history here.

    So yeah shut the fuck up
    It’s mind boggling you are so dumb you don’t understand how the process works. If the public supports it you could impeach a president for wearing green socks.

    Barr was right. Trump’s base of Trumptards like you were never going to read the report and don’t give two shits what’s in it. He pushed no collusion, no obstruction for a month and by the time the public actually got the report no one cared and had moved on. The Dems hoped by calling Mueller to testify they could shift public attention back to the Contents of the report but he wasn’t a very compelling witness and support for impeachment stayed in the high 30’s which was never going to move the needle.

    The public seems so far to understand the Ukraine situation better and the timing has been condensed which is why public support for it is up around 50. Hence why this is progressing while the Mueller report which most will never read didn’t.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    It's mind-boggling that you would think anyone give a fuck what you think, you worthless parrot @GDS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter