Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Regarding the Young Talent™

245

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,633 Swaye's Wigwam
    animate said:

    Vita and Gaines held that Alabama team to a standstill for much of the game. They covered up much of the weaknesses until the team was eventually Overwhelmed.

    People forget that.

    If we had depth plus the talent like that imagine ...

    Vita and Gaines plus rotating tuli and taki plus bandes and faatui etc ... Peterman get your shit together!

    There were some pretty average players that were ballin vs Alabama. Jaylen Johnson, Turpin, Tevis. They were confident and that matters a lot. We aren’t confident like we were back then.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,633 Swaye's Wigwam
    I don’t think either will be a star, but I wouldn’t write off Cam Williams or Kyler Gordon. By their junior and senior years they could be pretty good starters. They also could get passed up. Williams doesn’t even play anymore. If he can even get to being above average, his balls skills and playmaking ability will push him into the good to very good range.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Good poonts. But I'll DQ Otton & Kirkland because they started last year.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    I appreciate the optimism @Houhusky & @DoogCourics . But you're mentioning a lot of guys who either haven't even played or only limited.
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,902

    I don’t think either will be a star, but I wouldn’t write off Cam Williams or Kyler Gordon. By their junior and senior years they could be pretty good starters. They also could get passed up. Williams doesn’t even play anymore. If he can even get to being above average, his balls skills and playmaking ability will push him into the good to very good range.

    Williams. Talk about a guy who looked all world lining up against our WRs in camp. That don't translate to IRL.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    I appreciate the optimism @Houhusky & @DoogCourics . But you're mentioning a lot of guys who either haven't even played or only limited.

    I appreciate the optimism @Houhusky & @DoogCourics . But you're mentioning a lot of guys who either haven't even played or only limited.

    If you are DQing guys who played last year doesn’t it really have anything to do with actual young talent (Tm) on the roster.

    They are still young and talented.

    You’ve basically only limited the pool to young players (Fr-So?), that didn’t start in previous years, that have played significant time this year. (Do puka or newton count?)

    Chopping off the top and bottom bounds of playing time is obviously going to yield a small number.

    How many guys fit in your starting parameters on the roster regardless of being talented? 5?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Houhusky said:

    I appreciate the optimism @Houhusky & @DoogCourics . But you're mentioning a lot of guys who either haven't even played or only limited.

    I appreciate the optimism @Houhusky & @DoogCourics . But you're mentioning a lot of guys who either haven't even played or only limited.

    If you are DQing guys who played last year doesn’t it really have anything to do with actual young talent (Tm) on the roster.

    They are still young and talented.

    You’ve basically only limited the pool to young players (Fr-So?), that didn’t start in previous years, that have played significant time this year. (Do puka or newton count?)

    Chopping off the top and bottom bounds of playing time is obviously going to yield a small number.

    How many guys fit in your starting parameters on the roster regardless of being talented? 5?
    I'm talking about 2019 equivalents of 2015 Gaskin, Gaines or McGary. First year players that have played well, if not consistently, then at least often enough to catch the eye. All I came up with first was McDuffie, but others rightly pointed out #MyDick. Puka has definitely flashed, but only flashes. Latu maybe too (honestly, what happened? Hurt?). Tuli/Taki are debatable. Mele is a good one.

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,633 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited November 2019

    I don’t think either will be a star, but I wouldn’t write off Cam Williams or Kyler Gordon. By their junior and senior years they could be pretty good starters. They also could get passed up. Williams doesn’t even play anymore. If he can even get to being above average, his balls skills and playmaking ability will push him into the good to very good range.

    Williams. Talk about a guy who looked all world lining up against our WRs in camp. That don't translate to IRL.
    He still had 3 picks in a quarter of the season. He is a bad tackler but that can improve with strength and reps. The most worrisome part was his breakdowns, giving up long TD passes when he was 20 yards deep before the snap.

    I think the coaches got a little too excited and enamored with him early. He probably would be better off if he hadn’t played at all because getting benched can really hurt a guy’s confidence. I hope that’s not the case.

    With most young guys, if they have one stand out skill, they end up being pretty good. Williams ball skills are really good. Kevin King sucked his first two years but was always a great athlete. Kyler Gordon is an amazing athlete.

    Sirmon on the other hand, has no standout skill that makes me think there is something to work with.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    A lot of dooging going on here