Why the HondoBros will fail

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

So I've never said it. And you clearly agree.

Pathological liar