Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why the HondoBros will fail

«13

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Well regulated means lots of regulations.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,081 Standard Supporter

    Well regulated means lots of regulations.

    Time to mark the commies. Again.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,081 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2019
    Oh and lets treat gun control with the same liberal logic as birth control!

    Tell 'em Babushka!


  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?
    Triggered much?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?
    Triggered much?
    How so?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,081 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.
    I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

    That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,221
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

    That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.
    I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

    That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.
    What a fucking Kunt. Yeah the shared characteristics of people who murder other people with guns is their lack of training and respect for guns.

    You squat when you pee don’t you Hondo