This year reminds me a lot of 2015
I'm not really that pissed anymore. This was not a team capable of winning an NY6 so I dont really care about the bowl games below that.
Next year is a big turning point for the program. Can Petersen be honest with himself and get the program back to a conference title? Will we break in a Sirmon or Morris and have another mediocre year?
This year sucks but Petersen has overall done a good job. It will be interesting to see how he responds to adversity.
LIFPO for now. The expectation has to be a North title next year.
Comments
-
I’m at basically the same place mentally. I’m frustrated as fuck with Pete. But I felt the same way in 2015 and I LIPO.
-
I see it as the inverse of 2015, where in year 2 we* had some young guys popping and got better as the season went on. Won a couple we shouldn’t. I felt like I could see where the program was trying to go.
In year 6, I don’t. -
I agree with some points you made. I think many people on these boards have been way too hard on the younger players. Guys like Opera and Smellington have earned every bit of the shit talk.
I disagree with Pete doing a good job this year. He has done a piss poor job this year. This team, even breaking in all the new compents, should be no worse than 7-2 right now. 5-4 is not acceptable with this team in this conference.
This is a turning point for Pete. We will see what type of coach he is. If he trots out the same bullshit next year well there you go. I thought he was going to make some changes after the Rose Bowl and that sure as hell didn't happen -
nope, the players are regressing and it is supposedly a more talented roster
-
The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
-
Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the leagueoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.
Maybe finish this year then pop off
2014 was a while ago -
Oregon has dominated the conference enough this decade to pop off whenever and wherever. When these two north conference juggernauts win a playoff game, maybe they can popoff then.RaceBannon said:
Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the leagueoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.
Maybe finish this year then pop off
2014 was a while ago -
Oregon hasn't done shit in 5 yearsoregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon has dominated the conference enough this decade to pop off whenever and wherever. When these two north conference juggernauts win a playoff game, maybe they can popoff then.RaceBannon said:
Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the leagueoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.
Maybe finish this year then pop off
2014 was a while ago
UW 2 out of 3 defending champions
Better finish duck -
Serious question for you. How much talent does Oregon have returning next year?oregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
The returning OL starts can be misleading but Oregon has benefited from those guys getting experience + good coaching.
I look at that team and can see them dropping back to 7-5 or 8-4 next year but that’s coming from someone who doesn’t follow them. -
Oregon is likely going to regress next year regardless of how this year endsoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
-
Dont misunderstand me - Pete had done a fucking horrible job this year. Most of the losses he has been outcoached.BeerThirty said:I agree with some points you made. I think many people on these boards have been way too hard on the younger players. Guys like Opera and Smellington have earned every bit of the shit talk.
I disagree with Pete doing a good job this year. He has done a piss poor job this year. This team, even breaking in all the new compents, should be no worse than 7-2 right now. 5-4 is not acceptable with this team in this conference.
This is a turning point for Pete. We will see what type of coach he is. If he trots out the same bullshit next year well there you go. I thought he was going to make some changes after the Rose Bowl and that sure as hell didn't happen
If he can make some adjustments and get an experienced pissed off roster playing well next year, another conference title should be the expectation. -
The biggest challenge will replacing Herbert. He's no Mariota, but he's competent and experienced, and has shown the ability to finish off and win games when he's needed. The OL will lose some guys, so it will be a less experienced group over all. Losing linebacker Troy Dye will hurt. Recruiting continues to be hot, and Oregon continues to pull in some of the best recruits in the nation to fill the voids. I don't see a drop to 7-5 or 8-4 unless the new QB is a dud. Not likely though, as this team is typically known for its high quality players at the most important position. Also no other team in the conference really appears to be on the rise, with most of the recent conference powers trending down instead of up. The early test against tOSU will be the most difficult game of the regular season.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Serious question for you. How much talent does Oregon have returning next year?oregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
The returning OL starts can be misleading but Oregon has benefited from those guys getting experience + good coaching.
I look at that team and can see them dropping back to 7-5 or 8-4 next year but that’s coming from someone who doesn’t follow them. -
I agree but we should be so much better than 2015. I didn’t really care about Utah tho because it really makes no difference.
-
I am with you as far as letting this year go but that "if" is what worries me. There are some valid reasons for not having a good year such as a complete lack of capable players at ILBs and the youth at defensive side. However, the insistence of playing Manu and Opera Singer, the piss poor game day play call/adjustment, the inability to win close games are not going to change in a year (except manure and singer are gone, thank goodness but he will have other ways to fuck up the roster management). Unless he hires a proven OC and refrains from meddling himself right away, I am not optimistic because many things went wrong this season that was not a talent/youth issue alone.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Dont misunderstand me - Pete had done a fucking horrible job this year. Most of the losses he has been outcoached.BeerThirty said:I agree with some points you made. I think many people on these boards have been way too hard on the younger players. Guys like Opera and Smellington have earned every bit of the shit talk.
I disagree with Pete doing a good job this year. He has done a piss poor job this year. This team, even breaking in all the new compents, should be no worse than 7-2 right now. 5-4 is not acceptable with this team in this conference.
This is a turning point for Pete. We will see what type of coach he is. If he trots out the same bullshit next year well there you go. I thought he was going to make some changes after the Rose Bowl and that sure as hell didn't happen
If
he can make some adjustments and get an experienced pissed off roster playing well next year, another conference title should be the expectation. -
Totally in the same boat. Here's a list of the guys playing/starting in 2015 that made up the nucleus of the 2016 team:GrundleStiltzkin said:I see it as the inverse of 2015, where in year 2 we* had some young guys popping and got better as the season went on. Won a couple we shouldn’t. I felt like I could see where the program was trying to go.
In year 6, I don’t.
defense: Vita/Greg/Qualls/Jaylen/Mathis/Azeem/Keyshaun/Budda/Sydney/Kevin
Honorable mention: Turner/Jordan Miller/Mcintosh
Offense: Browning/Gaskin/Tre/Kaleb/Shelton/Eldenkamp/Daniels/Sample/Pettis
The 2016 Defense reminded me of the Emtman/Hoffman/Clifford/Hall/Tommie Smith/Shane P at the end of 89 which started the 3 year run.
-
All the excuses to be made for this team rest squarely with Pete's failings in years past or this year.
Is Bob Gregory going to be fired? Are we hiring a new OC and handing the keys to the offense to him?
LIPO is for when there isn't enough of a sample to draw some kind of conclusions about where things are going. It's year six not year 2. I don't see a lot of upward trajectory in the program at the moment. I see regression and plateaus. -
Another thought, there are basically 5 coaches in CFB immune to down years, tops.
Saban, Dabo, Urban, Smart, and Riley. 2 of those inherited good situations recently, Smart and Riley.
If our floor is an 8-4, 7-5 season then whatever. It just cant be more than a year in the "cellar" or else all the progress we made is fucking gone.
Next year our entire starting lineup seems like it will be highly rated 4 stars. It's time to beat Michigan and go undefeated. If Eason returns that is my expectation. -
This feels more like 2014 than 2015 to me ... but you can see the parallels
Only way this moves to 2015 is if Eason stays -
At this point I see no reason or indication to think that this coaching staff has an undefeated season in them.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Another thought, there are basically 5 coaches in CFB immune to down years, tops.
Saban, Dabo, Urban, Smart, and Riley. 2 of those inherited good situations recently, Smart and Riley.
If our floor is an 8-4, 7-5 season then whatever. It just cant be more than a year in the "cellar" or else all the progress we made is fucking gone.
Next year our entire starting lineup seems like it will be highly rated 4 stars. It's time to beat Michigan and go undefeated. If Eason returns that is my expectation. -
Defense will be better (everyone coming back except Dye and Winston). Offense will take a step back, especially early, with a new QB and 4 OL starters. The schedule is a lot easier, however.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is likely going to regress next year regardless of how this year endsoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
-
That should be the standard with a veteran roster and top 10 pick at QB. Big non con home game and then Pac 12 dreck. At Oregon and at Cal will be tricky but there is no reason UW shouldn't be the favorite in every game next year with a vet defense. Yes LB is a concern. At the very least Sirmon, Tafisi, Eddy, Latu, etc. got minutes. I anticipate LB being good next year along with every other position group. If Wellington is the returning vet at LB youre going to have problems. It was literally him, Manu, and freshman.UW_Doog_Bot said:
At this point I see no reason or indication to think that this coaching staff has an undefeated season in them.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Another thought, there are basically 5 coaches in CFB immune to down years, tops.
Saban, Dabo, Urban, Smart, and Riley. 2 of those inherited good situations recently, Smart and Riley.
If our floor is an 8-4, 7-5 season then whatever. It just cant be more than a year in the "cellar" or else all the progress we made is fucking gone.
Next year our entire starting lineup seems like it will be highly rated 4 stars. It's time to beat Michigan and go undefeated. If Eason returns that is my expectation. -
I would at least wait to see if we bounce back and win out before I make that declaration.
It’s still Pete’s faggy overcomplicated offense. Defense will improve, but I have no faith that Pete will unfuck the offense. Only time it ever looked good was when we had 4.2 speed Ross and Tedford looking over Pete’s shoulder (presumably telling Pete his play call was fucking stupid).
Program is dead in the fucking water unless Pete looks at the man in the mirror and asks him to change his ways, or Jen grows a pair and fires his soft loser okg ass. -
No question. I have confidence all the young players will get coached up, build on the experience, and play well.PurpleJ said:
Program is dead in the fucking water unless Pete looks at the man in the mirror and asks him to change his ways, or Jen grows a pair and fires his soft loser okg ass.
It's the offensive playcalling and philosophy that worries me the most.
Kwat/Lake built a National Title caliber defense. It was the 2nd best in the country behind Bama in 2016.
It's the offense that is the achilles heel until it's not. -
No offense, but has UW actually finished a season under Pete?RaceBannon said:
Oregon hasn't done shit in 5 yearsoregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon has dominated the conference enough this decade to pop off whenever and wherever. When these two north conference juggernauts win a playoff game, maybe they can popoff then.RaceBannon said:
Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the leagueoregonblitzkrieg said:The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.
Maybe finish this year then pop off
2014 was a while ago
UW 2 out of 3 defending champions
Better finish duck -
And then dumbfuck Pete fired Kwat from DC and gave Lake the job...
-
Point being both those guys have been coaching together for a while and have produced some great defenses. I trust them 100 times more than Pete to get the job done.PurpleJ said:And then dumbfuck Pete fired Kwat from DC and gave Lake the job...
-
I know. You repeated what I said with more words.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point being both those guys have been coaching together for a while and have produced some great defenses. I trust them 100 times more than Pete to get the job done.PurpleJ said:And then dumbfuck Pete fired Kwat from DC and gave Lake the job...
Point being one is a coordinator and the other is a db coach. If Jimmy can’t accept that, he can fuck off. -
I think lake is mostly DC in name onlyPurpleJ said:
I know. You repeated what I said with more words.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point being both those guys have been coaching together for a while and have produced some great defenses. I trust them 100 times more than Pete to get the job done.PurpleJ said:And then dumbfuck Pete fired Kwat from DC and gave Lake the job...
Point being one is a coordinator and the other is a db coach. If Jimmy can’t accept that, he can fuck off. -
How many more times are people going to make this post? It's the same drivel over and over at this point.
-
gnu hear?BleachedAnusDawg said:How many more times are people going to make this post? It's the same drivel over and over at this point.
