Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This year reminds me a lot of 2015

PostGameOrangeSlices
PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,676
edited November 2019 in Hardcore Husky Board
Close games that end in losses, lot of new faces playing big roles, lot of upperclassmen who are kind of good but not great (how will we ever replace Adams and Harris?!?!), new QB, etc.

I'm not really that pissed anymore. This was not a team capable of winning an NY6 so I dont really care about the bowl games below that.

Next year is a big turning point for the program. Can Petersen be honest with himself and get the program back to a conference title? Will we break in a Sirmon or Morris and have another mediocre year?

This year sucks but Petersen has overall done a good job. It will be interesting to see how he responds to adversity.

LIFPO for now. The expectation has to be a North title next year.
«1345

Comments

  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    I agree with some points you made. I think many people on these boards have been way too hard on the younger players. Guys like Opera and Smellington have earned every bit of the shit talk.

    I disagree with Pete doing a good job this year. He has done a piss poor job this year. This team, even breaking in all the new compents, should be no worse than 7-2 right now. 5-4 is not acceptable with this team in this conference.

    This is a turning point for Pete. We will see what type of coach he is. If he trots out the same bullshit next year well there you go. I thought he was going to make some changes after the Rose Bowl and that sure as hell didn't happen
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    nope, the players are regressing and it is supposedly a more talented roster
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2019
    The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,539 Founders Club

    The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.

    Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the league

    Maybe finish this year then pop off

    2014 was a while ago
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either.

    Stanford and UW have been winning the north and the league

    Maybe finish this year then pop off

    2014 was a while ago
    Oregon has dominated the conference enough this decade to pop off whenever and wherever. When these two north conference juggernauts win a playoff game, maybe they can popoff then.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,676

    The only problem with this scenario is that Oregon is now BACK and expects to be vying for conference titles every year. Stanford isn't going to stay shitty for very long either. Forget about USC. They are way too woke to hire a dude like Urban.

    Oregon is likely going to regress next year regardless of how this year ends