Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798
Comments
-
To the extent Daddy can’t be even more guilty of doing exactly what the call notes already show he was doing, I agree.SFGbob said:
I think his "corrections" are immaterial.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues... -
This issue really has a great hook. I'm sure America is on the edge of its seat waiting to see what half baked scheme gets leaked next
When will Nan call for a REAL vote so we can get this guy impeached!!??
We need to see the transcript
Here you go - nothing to see
WE NEED A SPECIAL COUNSEL
You do realize you people are clinically insane don't you?
When Trump released the transcript it was time to move to the next fake scandal -
Agreed.SFGbob said:
I think his "corrections" are immaterial.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues... -
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
-
You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.HoustonHusky said:
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning. -
You need to say "Daddy" and "damning" more times. It's really strengthening your case.HHusky said:
You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.HoustonHusky said:
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning. -
Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything onHHusky said:
You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.HoustonHusky said:
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.RussiaUkraine to pin on Trump.
Moron...
-
So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!HoustonHusky said:
Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything onHHusky said:
You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.HoustonHusky said:
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.RussiaUkraine to pin on Trump.
Moron... -
A response worthy of a HondoFSBro! I’m sure he is proud.GDS said:
So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!HoustonHusky said:
Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything onHHusky said:
You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.HoustonHusky said:
I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.HHusky said:
Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.HoustonHusky said:
If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?HHusky said:
The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.HoustonHusky said:
That's why he needed to change the transcript then?HHusky said:
Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”RaceBannon said:
Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the caseHHusky said:
Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?SFGbob said:
Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.HHusky said:
There is no transcript, madam.RaceBannon said:
That is just patheticHHusky said:
Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.Bendintheriver said:
You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.ramenduck said:
By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.Bendintheriver said:
Yes, by his own admission.ramenduck said:
Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.ramenduck said:
Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.DJDuck said:Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President
“FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.
And now this…
Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/
And pathological
They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
You need to get your lies straight...
Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.RussiaUkraine to pin on Trump.
Moron... -
Trumptards are struggling hugely to oppose the impeachment they support.
