Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798

15791011

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
    Does it?

    Seems to be stopping itself quite nicely
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
    Bootlicker heard from
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,011
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    So if I say I went surfing, you wouldn't know it was in the ocean unless I said the word "Ocean." Got it.


    And of course you're lying about not thinking the photo was staged.

    Bob on full tilt. And can't provide a link to back up his lying ass.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    Yeah, the "confession" along with where he asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden is very damning.