Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798

13

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
    Does it?

    Seems to be stopping itself quite nicely
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
    Bootlicker heard from
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    So if I say I went surfing, you wouldn't know it was in the ocean unless I said the word "Ocean." Got it.


    And of course you're lying about not thinking the photo was staged.

    Bob on full tilt. And can't provide a link to back up his lying ass.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    Yeah, the "confession" along with where he asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden is very damning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    Yeah, the "confession" along with where he asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden is very damning.
    He just wanted a public announcement of an investigation. Manufactured dirt would be a bonus of course.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
    So your answer is No.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
    So your answer is No.
    I think his answer was go fuck yourself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    He confessed

    Read the report

    You didn't read the report

    What transcript?

    There is no transcript
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
    To the extent Daddy can’t be even more guilty of doing exactly what the call notes already show he was doing, I agree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    This issue really has a great hook. I'm sure America is on the edge of its seat waiting to see what half baked scheme gets leaked next

    When will Nan call for a REAL vote so we can get this guy impeached!!??

    We need to see the transcript

    Here you go - nothing to see

    WE NEED A SPECIAL COUNSEL

    You do realize you people are clinically insane don't you?

    When Trump released the transcript it was time to move to the next fake scandal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
    Agreed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    You need to say "Daddy" and "damning" more times. It's really strengthening your case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
    So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    GDS said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
    So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!
    A response worthy of a HondoFSBro! I’m sure he is proud.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trumptards are struggling hugely to oppose the impeachment they support.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter