Ryan Day
Comments
-
Give me Lincoln Riley.
-
We have units on the team that do actually suck. The coaching has sucked. What fucking results are you basing any of this off? One stupid play call to Pleasant? If results mattered you wouldn’t be making up this fictitious point.RaceBannon said:Jesus
They suck. Results actually matter
Did you get bored of blaming the actual reasons we lose and needed to make something up for entertainment? The OL is way down on the list. Like Grundle just posted, they have been solid. All of this is based off a single play. Nothing else supports your opinion. -
This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned
If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong
5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss
Being Pete's best is meaningless
We get pushed around by good teams
They are a big part of the problem -
When we get pushed around, it will be the first time. It hasn’t happened this year.RaceBannon said:This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned
If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong
5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss
Being Pete's best is meaningless
We get pushed around by good teams
They are a big part of the problem -
I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
Not sure on Huff as a coach yet. For now he’s good. Next year with 3 new starters will show us more.YellowSnow said:
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I gotta be right first!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I am more and more concerned about this every week/year it goes by with Huff. We are fine/pretty good in conference play, then the bowl game comes, and we get exposed.YellowSnow said:
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.
I never have tons of confidence in them just lining up and pushing the los back two yards. IMO it's been more about Gaskin being special and finding the crease/sliver of space.
We are going to know a whole lot more next year, as it will be essentially his guys across the front minus Wattenburg.
