Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ryan Day

1235

Comments

  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Give me Lincoln Riley.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    Jesus

    They suck. Results actually matter

    We have units on the team that do actually suck. The coaching has sucked. What fucking results are you basing any of this off? One stupid play call to Pleasant? If results mattered you wouldn’t be making up this fictitious point.

    Did you get bored of blaming the actual reasons we lose and needed to make something up for entertainment? The OL is way down on the list. Like Grundle just posted, they have been solid. All of this is based off a single play. Nothing else supports your opinion.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,818 Founders Club
    This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned

    If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong

    5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss

    Being Pete's best is meaningless

    We get pushed around by good teams

    They are a big part of the problem
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned

    If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong

    5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss

    Being Pete's best is meaningless

    We get pushed around by good teams

    They are a big part of the problem

    When we get pushed around, it will be the first time. It hasn’t happened this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2019
    I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.

    We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.

    You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.

    I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.

    Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.

    We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.

    You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.

    I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.

    Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.

    Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,808 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.

    We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.

    You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.

    I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.

    Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.

    I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.

    We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.

    You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.

    I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.

    Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.

    Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.
    I gotta be right first!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,613 Swaye's Wigwam
    YellowSnow said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.

    We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.

    You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.

    I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.

    Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.

    I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.
    I am more and more concerned about this every week/year it goes by with Huff. We are fine/pretty good in conference play, then the bowl game comes, and we get exposed.

    I never have tons of confidence in them just lining up and pushing the los back two yards. IMO it's been more about Gaskin being special and finding the crease/sliver of space.

    We are going to know a whole lot more next year, as it will be essentially his guys across the front minus Wattenburg.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter