Ryan Day
Comments
-
ExcitingYellowSnow said:What’s Lincoln Riley’s sideline demeanor like?
-
Never heard of him.
-
Roadie vs race
-
2019 Team is better. 2008 Team had zero depth. Made it through the none BCS schedule injury free and still had nail biter wins over Oregon St, New Mexico and TCU. Axe @Tequilla. 2008 Utes suffer a handful of losses playing a BCS/P5 schedule due to lack of depth. And I think that goes for every G5 that pops off every year. I didn't think so at first, but after a long walk in P5-ville I've gained perspective.YellowSnow said:
The fuck are you talking about? Utah won a UCF natty in 2008 and beat Satan himself.89ute said:
Exact again. This is the best Utah team ever. It will be a while before another team like this comes along again. Need help to get to the conference championship. If we make it I think we have a shot at beating Oregon. No pie in the sky expectations beyond that. Next year we are a 7 or 8 win team tops.RaceBannon said:
This is your year quite honestly89ute said:
Exactly. Couple of 4 stars and a shit load of coached up 3s. Rose Bowl ceiling on Ohio St down years when the coached up 3 stars align.RaceBannon said:Wisconsin is the Utah of the B1G
@89ute -
Exactly this. Coach Pete screams from the mountain top how important the te's are and how many they need to have.backthepack said:Paopao’s already gone. We have no depth at TE you retard. We moved a C to TE and we play a freshmen walk-on (he’s good but still). We have 2 scholarship tight ends that play. Culp who knows whatever. We didn’t get a single good TE in last years class.
Assuming Hunter leaves next year, well have:
Cade, Kizer (who can't stay healthy), Culp who can't get on the field and has been passed by the combo h-back/te walk on Westover. Luciano has been banished to Siberia after the false start versus Cal.
And since Jordan P went 0 for 10 last year and decided to not take anyone after the guy chose Air Force over us, minimum 1 (more than likely 2) of the true freshman will play next year out of need whether their ready or not.
Jordan is gone at the end of the year. I think Bush is "re-assigned" to passing game coordinator/tight end coach. Those will be the easy ones for Pete.
The hard one will be Gregory if he's serious about making the changes necessary to take the next step as Bob's been with him for many years. -
*SIZZLE* POTY
-
You’re making shit up. I went back and checked the play by plays. All of these times we got our shit pushed in on 3rd and 4th didn’t happen.RaceBannon said:They just get their shit pushed in when it counts
As the facts show
Ahmed got stuffed for no gain in the 2nd half against USC on third down. I remember the play and the OL opened a hole. Ahmed missed it.
Newton converted a 3rd and 2 vs Cal. Ahmed broke a long TD on a 4th and one. Red zone issues were the Baccallia play and the false start on the 1 yard line.
We threw twice in a row to Hunter Bryant on 3rd and 4th and 3 against Stanford. He dropped both. That happened again on 4th and 2 with a throw to Baccallia in the 3rd quarter.
Pleasant got stuffed once against Oregon before we got a first on 4th down. Then in the 4th quarter he lost two on 3rd and 2. The wildcat with a shitty RB on telegraphed plays was FS. It was a retarded play call. RB missed a block for the sack on the final drive.
The OL opens holes in the run game and has protected Eason well. He’s a statue yet still has plenty of time to throw. RB missed a block on the final drive when Eason got sacked.
Our OL is better than our DL, LB’s, secondary, and WR’s, but they suck and definitely are the reason we are 5-3. We suck as a team.
The OL is a strength and are pretty good. 2nd best in the PAC 12 after Oregon. It’s the best OL we have had under Pete. You think Ahmed is running this good without a good OL? He’s not exactly a guy who makes something out of nothing. The games are in HD. It was pretty easy to see the huge holes he had the whole game vs Oregon.
I know I went Tequilla long, but leave the fiction to DDY and the teen boi stalkers. They’re good at it. -
Jesus
They suck. Results actually matter -
The OL has been solid. Not the worst part of the offense by any means.
-
Ryan Day is Mark Helfrich. Eventually the wheels will come off. Just a matter of when and where. Autzen Stadium next year is as good a place as any for it to happen.
-
Give me Lincoln Riley.
-
We have units on the team that do actually suck. The coaching has sucked. What fucking results are you basing any of this off? One stupid play call to Pleasant? If results mattered you wouldn’t be making up this fictitious point.RaceBannon said:Jesus
They suck. Results actually matter
Did you get bored of blaming the actual reasons we lose and needed to make something up for entertainment? The OL is way down on the list. Like Grundle just posted, they have been solid. All of this is based off a single play. Nothing else supports your opinion. -
This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned
If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong
5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss
Being Pete's best is meaningless
We get pushed around by good teams
They are a big part of the problem -
When we get pushed around, it will be the first time. It hasn’t happened this year.RaceBannon said:This is not a good O line for the reasons I already mentioned
If you have to go tequila long you're probably wrong
5 and 3. Never said one unit is responsible but the line fucked up in every loss
Being Pete's best is meaningless
We get pushed around by good teams
They are a big part of the problem -
I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
Not sure on Huff as a coach yet. For now he’s good. Next year with 3 new starters will show us more.YellowSnow said:
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I gotta be right first!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Race found a loose thread on your sweater and is pulling on it. Snip it off & move on.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL. -
I am more and more concerned about this every week/year it goes by with Huff. We are fine/pretty good in conference play, then the bowl game comes, and we get exposed.YellowSnow said:
I hope to god you’re right. I want Huff to be proven both a good corch and ace recruiter.RoadDawg55 said:I’ll stop arguing with a fence after this, but you’ve been proven wrong. You cited the RZ issues against Cal which had nothing to do with the OL. We settled for two FG’s because of a false start and Baccallia.
We ran the ball fine vs Stanford. None of the short yardage conversions had but anything to do with no getting push or heavy pressure. They were drops or incomplete passes. Mostly bad play calls.
You have one retarded play call vs Oregon. That’s it. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong.
I’ve watched every game. Not once did I think that the OL was hurting us in a noticeable way. I was very pleased with the holes they were opening up for Ahmed against Oregon. They were huge.
Nobody has commented on the OL sucking in game threads because they don’t. Maybe there has been a handful of plays they fucked up in pass pro. I remember Adams not playing his best vs Stanford. They have been plenty good enough to be 8-0 and the losses have very little to nothing to do with the OL.
I never have tons of confidence in them just lining up and pushing the los back two yards. IMO it's been more about Gaskin being special and finding the crease/sliver of space.
We are going to know a whole lot more next year, as it will be essentially his guys across the front minus Wattenburg.
-
It’s early, but he has the infrastructure at Ohio State to do really well. Day had only been at Ohio State for two years before being named coach. I think they hand picked him after seeing he was a really good coach that was capable of leading the program.oregonblitzkrieg said:Ryan Day is Mark Helfrich. Eventually the wheels will come off. Just a matter of when and where. Autzen Stadium next year is as good a place as any for it to happen.
They will beat you easily on the road next year with Fields returning. If they were breaking in a new QB, you might have a chance.
Urban Meyer stocked so much talent for him that it will take awhile for them to suffer if he’s a bad coach. And his season this year just makes it easier to get elite recruits to buy in and commit. -
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
-
Oregon isn't a top 10 team.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
-
The O line sucks and has directly contributed to three losses by being soft fucking losers
Great excuses as always
Results matter -
They won’t be by the end of the year. They are hanging on, which is all you need to do at this point, but a big loss is coming, even with the dreck left on their schedule.jecornel said:
Oregon isn't a top 10 team.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
-
You just squeaked by a limp dick cuog team at home. Fuck your entire fucking life loser.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
-
Day inherited an insanely good team. Helfrich looked good under that scenario. Let's see him after the Urbs wears off.
-
The AP poll disagrees.jecornel said:
Oregon isn't a top 10 team.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
-
See you at the EOTYoregonblitzkrieg said:
The AP poll disagrees.jecornel said:
Oregon isn't a top 10 team.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This conference isn't shit. There will be two top 10 PAC 12 teams after this weekend.GreenRiverGatorz said:Jesus christ who fucking cares. Sark jumped around a lot too. Ryan Day is a winner because he wins. The obsession with Pete's demeanor is fucking stupid. We had no problem with his angry brooding when we were going 12-2. Pete sucks because he's 2-3 in a shit conference, not because of this superficial shit you keep blabbering on about.
