Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We screwed

1356

Comments

  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486
    haie said:

    Utah lost to USC. They suck and we beat them like a drum every year. Sometimes twice.

    I will he fucking shocked if they win in Husky Stadium.

    If there are 2 schools in this conference Pete can beat reliably it's uoot and cuog

    Utah is a piece of shit mountain west program that needed 3 fucking years to season their piece of shit skill players.

    But the UW staff is a bunch of fucking losers this year and everyone is taking a turn. We're soft.

    They're rushing Potato field at Beavlet stadium this year for sure. Eason probably goes out with some injury over the next 3 weeks.

    You can take the corch out of Boise St but you can't take the Boise St out of the corch. I fucking love it. I get to say that after almost every Husky game I watch. Even after 6 years.

    https://youtu.be/mdPTWWr1Mak
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    Srsly, why risk long passes when you can tiptoe through the twolips of Wellington and Manu? Willingham doesn't need to take risks in this one.
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486

    Willingham will have a better game plan than 30 yard passes. Ball control and pounding the rock is all that’s required when UW can’t tackle or get off the field on 4th down.

    Your? O-Line is good, but I think we still will bring enough pressure to make Eason move. Eason moving = bad. Helps Utah IMO.
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486

    Srsly, why risk long passes when you can tiptoe through the twolips of Wellington and Manu? Willingham doesn't need to take risks in this one.

    You're exactly right. Huntley's stat line will look something like 11 of 16, 163 yards. We've seen very little deep stuff this year.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    89ute said:

    Willingham will have a better game plan than 30 yard passes. Ball control and pounding the rock is all that’s required when UW can’t tackle or get off the field on 4th down.

    Your? O-Line is good, but I think we still will bring enough pressure to make Eason move. Eason moving = bad. Helps Utah IMO.
    Has UW's offense lost a game yet? It may be weak, but it put up 31 against what was supposed to be one of the best Ds in the nation. UW's O is not my worry. We've seen years of shitty offenses under Pete.

    UW has lost 2 come-from-behind games this season and sucked dick all game long vs. Furd because they couldn't stop the run. And they couldn't stop the run because they can't tackle or get off blocks.

    It's a rare down year for the D, but it's a very, very down year, regardless.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    89ute said:

    Willingham will have a better game plan than 30 yard passes. Ball control and pounding the rock is all that’s required when UW can’t tackle or get off the field on 4th down.

    Your? O-Line is good, but I think we still will bring enough pressure to make Eason move. Eason moving = bad. Helps Utah IMO.
    I think your back-end coverage will dictate that as much as your D-Line will. Eason can hit open targets on the run. They just can't catch or get their feet down in bounds.
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,486
    edited October 2019

    89ute said:

    Willingham will have a better game plan than 30 yard passes. Ball control and pounding the rock is all that’s required when UW can’t tackle or get off the field on 4th down.

    Your? O-Line is good, but I think we still will bring enough pressure to make Eason move. Eason moving = bad. Helps Utah IMO.
    I think your back-end coverage will dictate that as much as your D-Line will. Eason can hit open targets on the run. They just can't catch or get their feet down in bounds.
    I like the match-up between Utah DBs and Worshington WRs. You have nothing close to SCs guys who won key 1 of 1 plays. Everyone else has been shut down. I think your O-Line keeping Eason clean is your best bet. This is the match-up I'm most excited about seeing. Eason may be able to hit guys on the run, but Eason is slow. Very slow. Our DTs & DEs are very fast.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    89ute said:

    89ute said:

    Willingham will have a better game plan than 30 yard passes. Ball control and pounding the rock is all that’s required when UW can’t tackle or get off the field on 4th down.

    Your? O-Line is good, but I think we still will bring enough pressure to make Eason move. Eason moving = bad. Helps Utah IMO.
    I think your back-end coverage will dictate that as much as your D-Line will. Eason can hit open targets on the run. They just can't catch or get their feet down in bounds.
    I like the match-up between Utah DBs and Worshington WRs. You have nothing close to SCs guys who won key 1 of 1 plays. Everyone else has been shut down. I think your O-Line keeping Eason clean is your best bet. This is the match-up I'm most excited about seeing. Eason may be able to hit guys on the run, but Eason is slow. Very slow. Out DTs & DEs are very fast.
    How are your LBs?
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    edited October 2019
    UW will not hold up to the bludgeoning Utah will unleash on lake's soft defense.

    This staff sucks.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,503 Swaye's Wigwam

    Who cares?

    It’s not 2020.


    Tsio.

    I still want to win, but ultimately it doesn’t matter either way. I remember in 2014 everyone freaked out about the Arizona loss, and it was bad. The season was already over tho and it didn’t matter.