Pac 10 again? You crybabies just might get your round robin schedule back.

VERY interesting rumors circulating at #Big12 Media Days about #SunDevils and #BearDown dumping the #Pac12 for the Central Time Zone games for more national exposure. Stay tuned for much more conference realignment as we get closer to TV renegotiations. pic.twitter.com/BKjYJOuNa9
— SWAIM SPORTS, LLC (@GSwaim) October 22, 2019
Comments
-
NOGAF nationally about the Big 12 lol. Oklahoma, Texas, and nogaf.
That would be dumb by the AZ schools -
LOL. Addition by subtraction
-
Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
-
ASU and UA should reform a tuff WAC with Ute and BYE.
-
Lol imagine dropping Seattle, Bay Area, LA, Boulder for Lubbock, Waco, Lawrence, and Ames.
-
Fuck the desert forever
-
I remember when we solved the whole thing by having the Pac 8 be the West and the Big 8 be the East and Utah falling back into the WACThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
They should have listened -
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!! -
For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, [in] a salt land and not inhabited.dnc said:Fuck the desert forever
-
89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
-
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules -
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams -
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
-
The Pac 8 would be the premier conference of the west again and get a bid regardless for playing tuff schedules. Keep more players home too
Nobody wants to stay west and play Utah every year. Its killing recruiting -
yes, that is something that the ADs and university presidents need to really pick up on... if 2 teams find that Larry Scott's innovative business model is repulsing our own teams to the point they'd rather get more exposure and money by joining a fraternity of those cities you really need to take action toot sweet.UWhuskytskeet said:Lol imagine dropping Seattle, Bay Area, LA, Boulder for Lubbock, Waco, Lawrence, and Ames.
-
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC! -
Sweet....now Backhand Larry can add BSU and BYU
-
This guy gets itwhuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
The BCS and the playoffs are killing college football -
I doubt that 60ish P5 teams are going to be willing to give up a game just so 4 more teams can play in a play off. Pac 10 works, like it does for the XII.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I think the "prevailing trend" might be more toward 4 X 16 than 8 team playoff. But I'm not any smarter than any of you dumb fucks, so fuck off.
Pac 8 is a pipe dream. More likely in a 4 X 16 alignment. -
Good. NOC. They suck.
-
but then again, if 10 is so cool, why would the XII be thinking about 12? Assuming this rumor is at all true.
-
Couple of comments. I could live with a PAC 10. Round robin 9 conference games and ABC out of conference schedule. As far as going to an 11 game regular season. Essentially when we schedule North Dakota or Portland State that is giving up a game right there because the stadium is half empty. 16 is too many for a playoff as there are not 16 worthy teams each year. You could make a pretty good case for 8 worthy each year though.89ute said:
I doubt that 60ish P5 teams are going to be willing to give up a game just so 4 more teams can play in a play off. Pac 10 works, like it does for the XII.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I think the "prevailing trend" might be more toward 4 X 16 than 8 team playoff. But I'm not any smarter than any of you dumb fucks, so fuck off.
Pac 8 is a pipe dream. More likely in a 4 X 16 alignment.
Edit: I don't like the expanded 12 and 16 team conference idea. You should play everyone in your conference and determine a true champion over the season. The conference championship game is a stupid unnecessary idea that is TV driven and not that many people care as indicated by in game attendance. -
It makes more sense for the Big 12 to take Colorado and Houston.
-
I'm fine with two 8-team divisions where you play the other 7 schools and 2 crossovers. Have the Pac-8 and leftover MW garbage meet in a conference championship game.whuggy said:
Couple of comments. I could live with a PAC 10. Round robin 9 conference games and ABC out of conference schedule. As far as going to an 11 game regular season. Essentially when we schedule North Dakota or Portland State that is giving up a game right there because the stadium is half empty. 16 is too many for a playoff as there are not 16 worthy teams each year. You could make a pretty good case for 8 worthy each year though.89ute said:
I doubt that 60ish P5 teams are going to be willing to give up a game just so 4 more teams can play in a play off. Pac 10 works, like it does for the XII.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I think the "prevailing trend" might be more toward 4 X 16 than 8 team playoff. But I'm not any smarter than any of you dumb fucks, so fuck off.
Pac 8 is a pipe dream. More likely in a 4 X 16 alignment.
Edit: I don't like the expanded 12 and 16 team conference idea. You should play everyone in your conference and determine a true champion over the season. The conference championship game is a stupid unnecessary idea that is TV driven and not that many people care as indicated by in game attendance. -
TV contract would go to shit losing #12 Phoenix, 17 Denver, 30 SLC.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm fine with two 8-team divisions where you play the other 7 schools and 2 crossovers. Have the Pac-8 and leftover MW garbage meet in a conference championship game.whuggy said:
Couple of comments. I could live with a PAC 10. Round robin 9 conference games and ABC out of conference schedule. As far as going to an 11 game regular season. Essentially when we schedule North Dakota or Portland State that is giving up a game right there because the stadium is half empty. 16 is too many for a playoff as there are not 16 worthy teams each year. You could make a pretty good case for 8 worthy each year though.89ute said:
I doubt that 60ish P5 teams are going to be willing to give up a game just so 4 more teams can play in a play off. Pac 10 works, like it does for the XII.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I think the "prevailing trend" might be more toward 4 X 16 than 8 team playoff. But I'm not any smarter than any of you dumb fucks, so fuck off.
Pac 8 is a pipe dream. More likely in a 4 X 16 alignment.
Edit: I don't like the expanded 12 and 16 team conference idea. You should play everyone in your conference and determine a true champion over the season. The conference championship game is a stupid unnecessary idea that is TV driven and not that many people care as indicated by in game attendance. -
Meh, we'll bring in Eastern Wash which has been more competition to us than the likes of Utah.89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
-
Nobody wants to play Jay Norvell's Nevada in a championship game. Nobody.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm fine with two 8-team divisions where you play the other 7 schools and 2 crossovers. Have the Pac-8 and leftover MW garbage meet in a conference championship game.whuggy said:
Couple of comments. I could live with a PAC 10. Round robin 9 conference games and ABC out of conference schedule. As far as going to an 11 game regular season. Essentially when we schedule North Dakota or Portland State that is giving up a game right there because the stadium is half empty. 16 is too many for a playoff as there are not 16 worthy teams each year. You could make a pretty good case for 8 worthy each year though.89ute said:
I doubt that 60ish P5 teams are going to be willing to give up a game just so 4 more teams can play in a play off. Pac 10 works, like it does for the XII.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I think the "prevailing trend" might be more toward 4 X 16 than 8 team playoff. But I'm not any smarter than any of you dumb fucks, so fuck off.
Pac 8 is a pipe dream. More likely in a 4 X 16 alignment.
Edit: I don't like the expanded 12 and 16 team conference idea. You should play everyone in your conference and determine a true champion over the season. The conference championship game is a stupid unnecessary idea that is TV driven and not that many people care as indicated by in game attendance. -
This almost gives me wood.whuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
I'm mainly sick of the need to go undefeated. College football is the only big time sport where there's such pressure to win every game just to be in the conversation at the end. The best teams in the NFLdrop a game or few with extremely rare exceptions. The only undefeated NFL team of my lifetime wasnt the best team at the end. Wild card teams have dominated the playoffs and even won the super bowl. Dominant NBA teams win about 7/8 games, equivalent to 14-2. In the majors it's about 5/8 or 10-6.
Shrink the conferences back down, give everyone 7 conference and four nonconference games, and expand the playoff and there would be no reason for the big time programs not to play each other.
I think the fix is relatively simple and everyone would benefit. -
I like UA for basketball purposes, but other than that who cares
-
I’m always annoyed that people pretend strength of schedule actually matters. No matter how hard your schedule is, if a team loses two games, they aren’t making the playoff.RaceBannon said:
This guy gets itwhuggy said:
Yeah we'll have to wait a few years but the prevailing trend is towards an 8 team playoff. That means win the PAC 8 or PAC 10 and you are in even with 3 or 4 losses. Imagine being able to schedule tough again out of conference because it will all come down to winning your conference. Schedule might even drop back to 11 regular season games to accomodate the extra playoff round. In a PAC 8 you could have a round robin conference schedule and 4 OOC games based on A-B-C-C opponents. A boon for the fans who dont want to see North Dakota or Portland State anymore.89ute said:
Not quite, the BIG recently changed their stance on NO FCS.RaceBannon said:
Things change all the time in college football89ute said:
No one wants to load up their schedule with a bunch of non con P5s. Axe the SEC.RaceBannon said:89ute said:
Lets see. 7 conference games and 5 out of conference games. Good lucking scheduling those 5 ooc games. Liberty, UMass, Idaho State. You're as fucking stupid as Larry Scott.ThomasFremont said:Not far enough. Cut the rest of the dead weight and bring back the PAC-8.
See ya in the playoffs!!!!11!111!!!
We used to do 4 non cons a year and had awesome schedules
Even the SEC wants P 5 match ups now
The B1G has to play power 5 teams
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/7/24/16020112/big-ten-fcs-opponents-football-scheduling
The SEC plays 8 conf but many have a permanent rivalry match-up with a non con P5, like Florida - Florida St.
Same with the ACC plus 5 teams play Notre Dame.
It would be tough for 8 teams to try to beef up their schedules to match the other P5s where most already play 9-10 P5s as it is.
You can kiss the playoffs good buy along with all the top west coast recruits. (already happening)
Pac 8 would be the WAC!
The BCS and the playoffs are killing college football