The guys picked the right year to make like a tree and leaf
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
Comments
-
I trust the coaches
-
I think Pete's first few classes over performing warped everyone's expectations for how players develop in his program. Evaluating and developing isn't magic, there's a lot of luck to it.
We got lucky on a lot of guys in the 13-15 classes, and we got unlucky on guys in the 16-17 classes. Anyone who thinks they are significantly better at evaluating talent than another school is full of shit, the best teams are only slightly better at it than the worst teams. The only way to be consistent is to recruit elite players at every single position every single year. -
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM. -
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times. -
Can you elaborate?RoadDawg55 said:
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times. -
Interesting.RoadDawg55 said:
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times.
Omit that part if you like and the story still says the same thing = fuck peterman -
Guys on the sideline didn’t seem all that invested. Kind of watching and hanging out. I’m not sure it’s something to be concerned about, but there didn’t seem to be a ton of intensity.rustysavage said:
Can you elaborate?RoadDawg55 said:
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times. -
In that final drive, I was alarmed by the lack of urgency from the offense on the fieldRoadDawg55 said:
Guys on the sideline didn’t seem all that invested. Kind of watching and hanging out. I’m not sure it’s something to be concerned about, but there didn’t seem to be a ton of intensity.rustysavage said:
Can you elaborate?RoadDawg55 said:
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times. -
Few things in life are as galling for me as watching athletes laughing and smiling while they lose/immediately after the loss. I would think Petersen would be the same, but it seems like we've seen it a couple times this year.RoadDawg55 said:
I used to think guys on our team were too tight, but at after watching the players on the sideline on Saturday, I changed my opinion completely.dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
Everyone seemed loose, even on the final drive. I was kind of out off by Henry Roberts and another player yucking it up during those times. -
Look, I know the Stanford loss was an ass-raping, but let's not get all hyperbolic...dirtysouwfdawg said:
This was petermans yr to make all the HCH’s and nega dawgs shut the fuck up.RaceBannon said:The undercurrent of hostility towards recruiting grows with each loss
And yet because I am a fair person Washington 2.0 was not this year. In the grand tradition of Husky football it is next year or the year after. Now also to be fair, if the higher ranked recruits are going to lead us to the promised land it wouldn't have been this year.
However as Sven points out, does Petersen need 5 more years to get rid of the guys he has spent 5 years bringing here.
There seems to be a talent gap between what was left and did goo d in 2016 and what is here doing bad in 18 and 19
Can we trust the evaluation?
Can we get rid of the poor actual coaching for some units?
There are exceptions to the its the head coach iron law. A very good head coach that is challenged in some areas can be helped to excel with the right assistants. We saw it when James hired Pinkel and Gilby
Mario apparently found a good DC at Oregon
Reilly hired the coog to save the Oklahoma defense.
Orgeon found an OC at LSU
tick tick tick
If fuck face was really an elite coach and we were really on the way (back?) to being a blue blood we would have reloaded and not fell on our dicks. Elite teams, that put a similar # of guys in the league as we did last year, go through this anally and don’t miss a beat.
We may never recruit top 5 classes every year but why not top 10 every year? We have been hovering around 15 so the talent is here.
We did fuck up with LB’s and DL but that’s not what’s causing this shit.
It’s Pete and how he runs his fucking program. On one end we know they develop the fuck out of talent but at the cost of not playing the young talent soon enough...
Guys are still too tight. Pete needs to back the fuck off, quit micro managing and allow this program to have some fucking fun.
Change may occur but at a fucking snails pace.
Prove me wrong peterman and make 2-3 significant changes to your staff. I fucking dare you.
Until then we always lose to cal and oregon and occasionally the furd.
FM.
