Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So it begins
Comments
-
Some states take guns away from the mentally ill. How is this so different? We categorize people who don’t get guns because they pose a danger to society. So what?Sledog said:
Is it classified as a terror group in the US? If so how did he pass the background for a CCW?2001400ex said:
Yes taking guns away from a dude linked to a terrorist group is akin to putting people into camps. What are you afraid of? Afraid tell take your guns because the groups you are linked to?Sledog said:
Watching commies argue about stripping rights away is fucking special. When they get sent to the camps I'm sure they'll protest.2001400ex said:
No one has said it's illegal. But his activities are clearly enough for them to take his guns. Do you think it's possible there's more to the story that's not reported?USMChawk said:
He’s a Nazi. Distasteful but not illegal. Canada decided that was enough to categorize him as a member of a terrorist organization and ban him. That ban appears to be the trigger for enacting the Red Flag law. Canada’s laws are not sufficient to override Constitutional rights.2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat.
Shill on dumbfuck. -
2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat.
Which is it? Show you proof from the article or there’s more that what was reported? Sounds like you’re arguing your feelings and not facts. I’m not willing to give up any rights because of your feelings.2001400ex said:
No one has said it's illegal. But his activities are clearly enough for them to take his guns. Do you think it's possible there's more to the story that's not reported?USMChawk said:
He’s a Nazi. Distasteful but not illegal. Canada decided that was enough to categorize him as a member of a terrorist organization and ban him. That ban appears to be the trigger for enacting the Red Flag law. Canada’s laws are not sufficient to override Constitutional rights.2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat.
-
Both.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat.
Which is it?2001400ex said:
No one has said it's illegal. But his activities are clearly enough for them to take his guns. Do you think it's possible there's more to the story that's not reported?USMChawk said:
He’s a Nazi. Distasteful but not illegal. Canada decided that was enough to categorize him as a member of a terrorist organization and ban him. That ban appears to be the trigger for enacting the Red Flag law. Canada’s laws are not sufficient to override Constitutional rights.2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat. -
Hondo missing the point as usual.2001400ex said:
Who actually thinks Evangelical Christians are a hate group? Hyperbole much?PurpleThrobber said:
Who gets to decide that, Hondo?2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
To the extreme progressive, Evangelical Christians are a hate group because of their beliefs - religious and political. Are they banned because Josephine Stalinista decides they are ‘hateful’? -
Some judged to be a danger to themselves and others is will proven law. That you want someone's guns taken because you don't like their politics isn't. But that's the left.Rubberfist said:
Some states take guns away from the mentally ill. How is this so different? We categorize people who don’t get guns because they pose a danger to society. So what?Sledog said:
Is it classified as a terror group in the US? If so how did he pass the background for a CCW?2001400ex said:
Yes taking guns away from a dude linked to a terrorist group is akin to putting people into camps. What are you afraid of? Afraid tell take your guns because the groups you are linked to?Sledog said:
Watching commies argue about stripping rights away is fucking special. When they get sent to the camps I'm sure they'll protest.2001400ex said:
No one has said it's illegal. But his activities are clearly enough for them to take his guns. Do you think it's possible there's more to the story that's not reported?USMChawk said:
He’s a Nazi. Distasteful but not illegal. Canada decided that was enough to categorize him as a member of a terrorist organization and ban him. That ban appears to be the trigger for enacting the Red Flag law. Canada’s laws are not sufficient to override Constitutional rights.2001400ex said:
With the information provided by the link. Show where this isn't a credible threat.USMChawk said:
True Threat statements aren’t protected by the First Amendment, so your scenarios are invalid. There’s no need for a Red Flag law to cover something that’s already illegal. Unless the intent of the Red Flag laws is actually gun confiscation, outside of Constitutional protections.2001400ex said:
So you are saying. If I post all over Facebook that I'm going to shoot up a school. Which is in my first amendment rights. That I should keep my guns until I shoot up a school?USMChawk said:
If you’re part of a known terrorist group there are legal processes already in place. You’re using a Reductio ad absurdum argument.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
Yes, I believe all people are entitled to their human rights. And all legal citizens are entitled to their civil rights, until such time that they are legally removed. If you are a member of a Nazi group, an Antifa group, a hate group of any political stripe BUT have not committed a crime, then you are allowed to keep your rights, which includes guns.
What if I call the police and tell them I'm going to be shooting up a school. Should they follow me to the school and not do anything until I open fire?
That being said, call me when someone's guns are confiscated who isn't a potential threat.
Shill on dumbfuck. -
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
Yeah and let’s let lefty groups like SPLC determine who is a “hate” group and who isn’t a hate group.2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Oppose illegal immigration? You’re obviously part of a hate group.
Opposes trannie rights? Hate group
Hell you have people who are willing to identify Trump supporters as part of some kind of hate group.
Antifa? No, they aren’t a hate group. BLM? Naaaah no hate there. -
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
Says the stupid piece of shit that thinks the “General Welfare” clause is talking about Food Stamps and Section 8 vouchers.2001400ex said:
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
I did not say that. At all. You are too dumb to realize what I said.SFGbob said:
Says the stupid piece of shit that thinks the “General Welfare” clause is talking about Food Stamps and Section 8 vouchers.2001400ex said:
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
You’re too dumb to realize you’re being mocked and angry the analogy exposed yuh once again as a clueless fucknut2001400ex said:
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
Angry? Ok Lil Man. Shocking you can't address the matter at hand and want to divert to meaningless bullshit. As. Always.MikeDamone said:
You’re too dumb to realize you’re being mocked and angry the analogy exposed yuh once again as a clueless fucknut2001400ex said:
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
-
Why do you embarrass yourself like this. Every thread. Everyday.2001400ex said:
Angry? Ok Lil Man. Shocking you can't address the matter at hand and want to divert to meaningless bullshit. As. Always.MikeDamone said:
You’re too dumb to realize you’re being mocked and angry the analogy exposed yuh once again as a clueless fucknut2001400ex said:
You are too dumb to realize the analogy is fucktarded..MikeDamone said:
The best part is you know the analogy is true and can’t defend your fucktarded position.2001400ex said:
The best part is you think this is clever. Little man.MikeDamone said:
There are obvious signs you’re dangerous. I think we need to start by taking away your 1st ands 15th amendment rights. They 1st because you say stupid shit. The 15th because you’re too stupid to vote. We all got together and decided you having those rights poses a threat to society. So we are taking them.2001400ex said:
So if there are obvious signs someone is dangerous. We should wait until they shoot up a bunch of people? I'm not for taking away anyone's guns. But if you are a part of a known terrorist group, that's another matter. Would you feel the same if this person was Muslim and a known affiliate to Al queda?USMChawk said:
WTF are you talking about? I’m saying you don’t get to infringe on someone’s Constitutional rights based on their thoughts or beliefs. As unappetizing as it is, you need to wait for them to commit a crime, that legally justifies curtailing their rights.2001400ex said:
So are you saying there are only hate groups on the right then? That's a bold statement but understandable given the source.USMChawk said:2001400ex said:How about not be a part of hate groups and terrorist groups. And you get to keep your guns. Got it pooky?
The petition also referenced his lifetime ban from Canada as a result of his membership in "an organization that may engage in terrorism."
Do you really lack this much self awareness?2001400ex said:
We'll put you on the list of supporting taking away guns based on politics.WestlinnDuck said:Support antifa? No guns? That takes out most of the MSM and Tug leftards.
I addressed it. Many times. My answer to taking guns from people who have committed no crime is to go fuck yourself. My analogy was perfect. You’re too dumb to comprehend it. -
But but but we should be able to take guns from people I don't agree with!!! How else can we get them into cattle cars to the prison camps! Said every NAZI.
-
Will I be red flagged and have my guns taken away if I suggest the overthrow of these illegitimate state governments that are operating outside the bounds of the Constitution?
-
No. But shooting down the 5G towers by your house might do the trick.oregonblitzkrieg said:Will I be red flagged and have my guns taken away if I suggest the overthrow of these illegitimate state governments that are operating outside the bounds of the Constitution?
-
-
YBFEoregonblitzkrieg said:x
