Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cia-whistleblower-who-traveled-w/Biden-to-ukraine-doesnt-want-to-testify-Will submit written answers

135

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,431
    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    Great rant. Sounds like you’ve stopped impeachment now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,769 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    Great rant. Sounds like you’ve stopped impeachment now.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,431
    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,681 Standard Supporter
    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,431
    edited October 2019
    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,681 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,431
    edited October 2019
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter