REPORT: Dems Consider Hiding ID of WB From GOP Lawmkers by Holding Testimony in Remote location &...

“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Comments
-
“Feared for his life”?!?
Barbara Hedges is the whistleblower.
-
They are so pathetically dishonest. THey know their idiotic goose steppers on here are dumb enough to swallow this shit, but the rest of the country sees this scam for what it is.
Again, just pathetically obvious. -
What is he accusing the GOP of exactly?DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?
This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit. -
Ok same question to you. What exactly is he accusing the GOP of?Bendintheriver said:So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?
This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit. -
The whistleblower law specifically provides the complainant anonymity.
The IC IG deemed the complaint credible. That’s why Congress is pursuing the issue.
There’s nothing you trumptards can do about this but bitch and whine, which you do daily. You don’t have a clue about what’s happening. -
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
Study this for a minuteHHusky said:
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
He released a transcript that confirmed you and you leftist pals were lying. Undettered, you and your fellow libs did what you always do, continue to lie in the hope that the usual suspect will continue to repeat the lies.HHusky said:
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.
Police canceled the game.
It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
-
H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
-
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
-
Interesting. blob accusing someone who disagrees with him of lying. What were the odds of that?SFGbob said:
He released a transcript that confirmed you and you leftist pals were lying. Undettered, you and your fellow libs did what you always do, continue to lie in the hope that the usual suspect will continue to repeat the lies.HHusky said:
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.
Police canceled the game.
It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy. -
Could you get together with some of your fellow Hondo Bros and get it straight on if we're calling what was released by the WH a "transcript" or not. It seems to trigger some of them when it's referred to as a transcript.HHusky said:
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
Maybe when they see a kneepadding bitch in good standing like yourself calls it's a "transcript" its not a big deal.
-
It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.SFGbob said:
Could you get together with some of your fellow Hondo Bros and get it straight on if we're calling what was released by the WH a "transcript" or not. It seems to trigger some of them when it's referred to as a transcript.HHusky said:
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
Maybe when they see a kneepadding bitch in good standing like yourself calls it's a "transcript" its not a big deal.
-
Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.HHusky said:
It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.SFGbob said:HHusky said:
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.
Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
-
So now a rumor-mongerer that has literally zero 1st hand knowledge of anything is somehow a "whistle-blower", the transcript that proves it is a sack of lies is no longer a transcript, the rumor-mongerer is impartial even though he/she just happens to be in bed with a current Dem 2020 candidate, and this moron who is anonymous is somehow also is worried because he/she is getting "death threats".
Although the last one may be true...from Hunter and Joe Biden...cause it finished off his already dead campaign...
And the ICIG didn't investigate anything...Congress is only investigating because the fraud went to Schiff first to get his attorneys to write it up. Congress should not have even heard about it because the DNI and DOJ investigated it and determined it was not credible.
And HondoBros wonder why we laugh at their stupidity... -
Trump is getting impeached. Keep melting down though.
-
Doesn’t make much difference whether it’s complete. Daddy did what he was accused of and so the whistleblower’s sources were correct. Then Daddy solicited foreign interference to benefit his campaign on the teevee, cuz of course he did.Blu82 said:
Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.HHusky said:
It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.SFGbob said:HHusky said:
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.
Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
But as I said last week, if Daddy wrote out and signed a confession, some of you cocksuckers would still defend him because it wasn’t written in blood. -
One thing you know for certain is that O'Keefed, never lies and you can take anything he says to the bank.HHusky said:
Doesn’t make much difference whether it’s complete. Daddy did what he was accused of and so the whistleblower’s sources were correct. Then Daddy solicited foreign interference to benefit his campaign on the teevee, cuz of course he did.Blu82 said:
Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.HHusky said:
It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.SFGbob said:HHusky said:
Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.RaceBannon said:H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.
Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
But as I said last week, if Daddy wrote out and signed a confession, some of you cocksuckers would still defend him because it wasn’t written in blood.
Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.
Police canceled the game.
It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
-
Or you could just read the fucking transcript, blob. It’s not that long. -
I have read it, you're lying. Just like your hero schiff is lying.HHusky said:
Or you could just read the fucking transcript, blob. It’s not that long.
You know what other transcript I'd like to read? The full Volker transcripts. But for some odd reason Schiff is refusing to release that entire transcript. Gosh I wonder why? Why are we having these interviews take place behind closed doors only to get cherry picked quotes released by Schiff? Why not release the entire transcript and let us judge for ourselves?
Because everything I know about liberals is that they lie.
Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.
Police canceled the game.
It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
-
How do people who are "anonymous" get death threats? Convenient. Probably AOC reporting.HoustonHusky said:So now a rumor-mongerer that has literally zero 1st hand knowledge of anything is somehow a "whistle-blower", the transcript that proves it is a sack of lies is no longer a transcript, the rumor-mongerer is impartial even though he/she just happens to be in bed with a current Dem 2020 candidate, and this moron who is anonymous is somehow also is worried because he/she is getting "death threats".
Although the last one may be true...from Hunter and Joe Biden...cause it finished off his already dead campaign...
And the ICIG didn't investigate anything...Congress is only investigating because the fraud went to Schiff first to get his attorneys to write it up. Congress should not have even heard about it because the DNI and DOJ investigated it and determined it was not credible.
And HondoBros wonder why we laugh at their stupidity... -
Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean.
-
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
LiarHHusky said:
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
Reading is fundamental, Race. Try it. You might learn something.RaceBannon said:
LiarHHusky said:
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
Only in a TDS infected mind.HHusky said:
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
No. It's actually right there in the "transcript". You girls read that yet?Sledog said:
Only in a TDS infected mind.HHusky said:
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean. -
No "there, there". Keep dreaming. What law was broken?HHusky said:
No. It's actually right there in the "transcript". You girls read that yet?Sledog said:
Only in a TDS infected mind.HHusky said:
What he alleged has been confirmed by the White House. I want to be patient, but it’s retarded to defend an admitted offense by yelling about the whistleblower’s politics.Sledog said:
Yawn. All smoke and mirrors. The whistle blower isn't and is a partisan stooge. You know it's true. Deep down you all knowHHusky said:Death threats?
Send the threat to his/her attorney? Not that hard to think of ways . . . for me, I mean.