State orders Sondland not to testify

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

There’s not much to know. You need to get the House to vote for a trial and the Senate has to agree by a 2/3 majority that the alleged acts are an impeachable offense.

Considering that you guys have an open and shut case, what’s the hold up?

If there’s not much to know, you should be able to accurately assess what’s occurring. Your post demonstrates you don’t understand anything. At all. If cuntwaffle wasn’t such a pussy, he’d reply to you with “embarrassing.”

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

There’s not much to know. You need to get the House to vote for a trial and the Senate has to agree by a 2/3 majority that the alleged acts are an impeachable offense.

Considering that you guys have an open and shut case, what’s the hold up?

If there’s not much to know, you should be able to accurately assess what’s occurring. Your post demonstrates you don’t understand anything. At all. If cuntwaffle wasn’t such a pussy, he’d reply to you with “embarrassing.”

Do you ever tire of chasing your tail?

Do you realize you completely inaccurately described impeachment? Remember your federal income tax / mortgage interest deduction face plant? Do you ever tire of embarrassing yourself?

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

There’s not much to know. You need to get the House to vote for a trial and the Senate has to agree by a 2/3 majority that the alleged acts are an impeachable offense.

Considering that you guys have an open and shut case, what’s the hold up?

If there’s not much to know, you should be able to accurately assess what’s occurring. Your post demonstrates you don’t understand anything. At all. If cuntwaffle wasn’t such a pussy, he’d reply to you with “embarrassing.”

Do you ever tire of chasing your tail?

Do you realize you completely inaccurately described impeachment? Remember your federal income tax / mortgage interest deduction face plant? Do you ever tire of embarrassing yourself?

I guess your answer to my question to you would be a no.

Lemme know when the Senate has 66 votes. Shouldn’t take long. Open and shut case ya know.

Jfc, I’d ignore you if you didn’t constantly make a fool of yourself.

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

There’s not much to know. You need to get the House to vote for a trial and the Senate has to agree by a 2/3 majority that the alleged acts are an impeachable offense.

Considering that you guys have an open and shut case, what’s the hold up?

If there’s not much to know, you should be able to accurately assess what’s occurring. Your post demonstrates you don’t understand anything. At all. If cuntwaffle wasn’t such a pussy, he’d reply to you with “embarrassing.”

Do you ever tire of chasing your tail?

Do you realize you completely inaccurately described impeachment? Remember your federal income tax / mortgage interest deduction face plant? Do you ever tire of embarrassing yourself?

I guess your answer to my question to you would be a no.

Lemme know when the Senate has 66 votes. Shouldn’t take long. Open and shut case ya know.

Jfc, I’d ignore you if you didn’t constantly make a fool of yourself.

So you’re sayin that the impeachment is NOT tried in the Senate?

And you’re also saying that the Senate doesn’t need 66 votes to remove the President from office?

And I’m the one that should be embarrassed?

Keep chasin it, you’ll get it one of these times.

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

*a summary of notes from the transcript

The transcript.

It’s not a transcript of the phone call.

We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.

Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.

Next year???

So He won’t be impeached?

So on top of not knowing anything about federal income taxes, mortgage interest deduction and the federal debt, you also don’t have a clue about what impeachment is. Basic civics.

So 3 months isn’t enough to gather testimony and have a vote in both Houses?

Hmmm. It’s almost as if your team knows that they are gonna lose and are just trying to extend the gayme

So you don’t know anything about the constitution and impeachment. You could have just said so.

There’s not much to know. You need to get the House to vote for a trial and the Senate has to agree by a 2/3 majority that the alleged acts are an impeachable offense.

Considering that you guys have an open and shut case, what’s the hold up?

If there’s not much to know, you should be able to accurately assess what’s occurring. Your post demonstrates you don’t understand anything. At all. If cuntwaffle wasn’t such a pussy, he’d reply to you with “embarrassing.”

Do you ever tire of chasing your tail?

Do you realize you completely inaccurately described impeachment? Remember your federal income tax / mortgage interest deduction face plant? Do you ever tire of embarrassing yourself?

I guess your answer to my question to you would be a no.

Lemme know when the Senate has 66 votes. Shouldn’t take long. Open and shut case ya know.

Jfc, I’d ignore you if you didn’t constantly make a fool of yourself.

So you’re sayin that the impeachment is NOT tried in the Senate?

And you’re also saying that the Senate doesn’t need 66 votes to remove the President from office?

And I’m the one that should be embarrassed?

Keep chasin it, you’ll get it one of these times.

You not only need to read article 2 section 4 of the constitution, you also need to take 3rd grade math. You may be right about something someday cuog. Today’s not your day.

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?

The emoluments clause applied to Ivanka in 2012? Got a link dumbfuck?

Trump and his kids are making tens of millions in 2019 off his presidency. Fuck off with that 2012 bullshit.

Explains why you posted a tweet from 2012. Are you admitting you're a dipshit who didn't look at the date of the tweet you posted?

I posted the tweet. I knew the date. Trump admittedly has a conflict of interest with Turkey. He made a military decision that gave Turkey the go ahead to attack the Kurds. It's worth pointing out since we were so concerned last week about fighting potential corruption and influence in international politics but I guess we don't care again this week.

Also how in the name of strawman ass fucking did I end up having to defend the post of that tweet in this thread.

RedRocket said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?

Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?

The emoluments clause applied to Ivanka in 2012? Got a link dumbfuck?

Trump and his kids are making tens of millions in 2019 off his presidency. Fuck off with that 2012 bullshit.

Explains why you posted a tweet from 2012. Are you admitting you're a dipshit who didn't look at the date of the tweet you posted?

I posted the tweet. I knew the date. Trump admittedly has a conflict of interest with Turkey. He made a military decision that gave Turkey the go ahead to attack the Kurds. It's worth pointing out since we were so concerned last week about fighting potential corruption and influence in international politics but I guess we don't care again this week.

Also how in the name of strawman ass fucking did I end up having to defend the post of that tweet in this thread.

Fine, but that's not the reason why IC re-posted it and he didn't notice the date. I have no argument with what you said is your reason for posting it.

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

Yes

RaceBannon said:

Turkey is a NATO ally

I'm fine with obliterating them but protocol insists we don't use force against fellow NATO members

The Kurds lose again

Do you see now what an imbecile you are Salem? Race’s post speaks volumes.

It sucks when the Busch lite wins in El Monte before the afternoon has hardly begun.

You have no idea how impeachment works nor can you calculate 2/3 of 100. Are you sober?

You all really need to tune into the BBC and get the straight scoop. They’re line of questioning and reporting shows this whole thing as strictly partisan theatrics.

Reportedly Sondland just said the same to the head of the EU.

Wake up, sheeple.

CirrhosisDawg said:

salemcoog said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

Yes

RaceBannon said:

Turkey is a NATO ally

I'm fine with obliterating them but protocol insists we don't use force against fellow NATO members

The Kurds lose again

Do you see now what an imbecile you are Salem? Race’s post speaks volumes.

It sucks when the Busch lite wins in El Monte before the afternoon has hardly begun.

You have no idea how impeachment works nor can you calculate 2/3 of 100. Are you sober?

Low skills!!!!


White Trash!!!!


Trumpanzees!!!!