Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff

1…1516182021…24

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    edited September 2019
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of complaining that connected people have certain advantages in life. What a snowflake!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    edited September 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    How many times have you trotted this out?


    I've seen about a half a dozen times in my short time here. He feels it's some kind of real deeeeep and insightful analysis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    2001400ex said:

    WSJ comes out against Trump.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176?mod=breakingnews

    They came out with a story. That's not an OpEd dumbfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing

    It was a coincidence

    Come on, you wouldn't expect O'Keefed to have an ounce of integrity would you?
    You mentioned integrity and the subject is an attorney! Hahahahahahahahaha!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    insinceredawg said:

    Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent til proven guilty but Democrats are guilty til proven innocent. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.

    Said the Trump impeachment supporter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    2001400ex said:

    WSJ comes out against Trump.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176?mod=breakingnews

    From the article that you obviously didn't read:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter