Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff

11819212324

Comments

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,632 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    Would love to see all the records of every Dem in Congress' bank accounts for idk, the last 20 years. If there's nothing to hide and they did nothing wrong, what are they afraid of?
    That's a terrible analogy
    It was a terrible fucking argument to begin with.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    Would love to see all the records of every Dem in Congress' bank accounts for idk, the last 20 years. If there's nothing to hide and they did nothing wrong, what are they afraid of?
    Did an IG find a credible and serious allegation of wrongdoing against every Dem in Congress? Please link that.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    No, he just gave him connections that all came from his position in Government.
    He “gave” him his connections? How’d he do that blob? Is there a connection ceremony?
    Work the balls O'Keefed, work the balls.

    Trump made his kid an Exec in a business he started long before he ever was in public office.


    Biden used his connections, along with John Kerry's connections to enrich himself. All of these connections were due to Biden's position in public office. Trump didn't use the government to give his son that job.

    Why are you so upset about Biden being investigated O'Keefed?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    If Biden has nothing to hide why did he try to stop the investigation?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    No, he just gave him connections that all came from his position in Government.
    He “gave” him his connections? How’d he do that blob? Is there a connection ceremony?
    Work the balls O'Keefed, work the balls.

    Trump made his kid an Exec in a business he started long before he ever was in public office.


    Biden used his connections, along with John Kerry's connections to enrich himself. All of these connections were due to Biden's position in public office. Trump didn't use the government to give his son that job.

    Why are you so upset about Biden being investigated O'Keefed?
    The real question is why Daddy’s administration is covering this whistleblower complaint up. That’s the immediate issue. The law required the information to be turned over days and days ago.

    If you want to investigate something, knock yourself out. Stop using your desire for a fishing expedition as an excuse for Daddy’s obstruction.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,632 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    No, he just gave him connections that all came from his position in Government.
    He “gave” him his connections? How’d he do that blob? Is there a connection ceremony?
    Work the balls O'Keefed, work the balls.

    Trump made his kid an Exec in a business he started long before he ever was in public office.


    Biden used his connections, along with John Kerry's connections to enrich himself. All of these connections were due to Biden's position in public office. Trump didn't use the government to give his son that job.

    Why are you so upset about Biden being investigated O'Keefed?
    The real question is why Daddy’s administration is covering this whistleblower complaint up. That’s the immediate issue. The law required the information to be turned over days and days ago.

    If you want to investigate something, knock yourself out. Stop using your desire for a fishing expedition as an excuse for Daddy’s obstruction.
    Sure, it should come out then right? Can't obstruct forever. All you gotta do is sit back and wait for those chickens to hatch then right?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,782 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2019
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing

    It was a coincidence

    Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.
    Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.

    But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....

    Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.

    And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.

    Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.

    TDS! TDS! TDS!


    Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.
    And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?

    Or just selective disclosed profiteering?

    So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.
    So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?

    Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?

    Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.

    Go.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,018 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    Daddy has no legal power to have any input on this.
    Bullshit
    Your legal scholarship is legendary.
    Better than yours

    Not bad for a contractor
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,018 Founders Club
    Biden story now front page news


    You all got played again
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing

    It was a coincidence

    Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.
    Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.

    But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....

    Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.

    And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.

    Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.

    TDS! TDS! TDS!


    Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.
    And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?

    Or just selective disclosed profiteering?

    So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.
    So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?

    Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?

    Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.

    Go.

    You’re over complicating things. The complaint should be turned over. You can investigate anything you choose to.