Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff
Comments
-
How many times have you trotted this out?2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
-
HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
-
How many times have you trotted this out?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
-
Justify? What the fuck are you talking about Kunt? I just asked you if he would have gotten the gig if his dad wasn't the VP. I never said I didn't know what he got. I was just trying get you to answer a fucking question before responding to your diversion. He "got" a directorship at the gas company and business for his law-firm. I assume none of this was done as charity work so he "got" money.HHusky said:
So you don’t know what he got but you want me to justify him getting it. I can’t imagine why people think you’re dishonest.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
It’s up to you to explain what was “shady” about his business dealings. So far I haven’t even seen you tell us what he received.SFGbob said:
Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.HHusky said:Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html
Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?
I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
You've become such a pathetic Kunt O'Keefed you now think everyone is like you. -
-
And it's fact. I'm sorry if it makes your butt pucker.RaceBannon said:
How many times have you trotted this out?2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
-
Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.GDS said:
Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.SFGbob said:
Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.HHusky said:Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html
Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?
I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done. -
You have any examples or evidence to support that ignorant twat of mouth of yours Kunt or is this just your standard drive by Kunt act?insinceredawg said:Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent til proven guilty but Democrats are guilty til proven innocent. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.
-
So what I'm gathering from this thread is that the hammer is dropping any day now...
-
Tongue that ass Hondo. Care to provide and example in support of your Kunt of a friend Hondo?2001400ex said:
FIFYinsinceredawg said:Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent no matter what evidence there is but Democrats are always guilty. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.
