Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump says he’s revoking California’s power to limit pollution from cars and trucks
Comments
-
First of all, this is Trump talking and nothing is going to come of it.SFGbob said:
Hondo prefers to fuck strawman ass. Does this action by Trump roll back existing emission standards Hondo?2001400ex said:
Race prefers to go back to a haze over downtown LA every day.RaceBannon said:Consumers win. Bigly
Better and safer cars. Air standards at the fed level remain
Fuck California and the bed wetters
Secondly, California has tighter restrictions for a reason and I won't live there for that reason. Although I haven't gotten a ticket with my deleted diesel yet.
And lastly, what happened to states rights? They can't be more stringent than feds now?
Da fuq are you defending this for? -
Google the clean air act of 1970. Under this federal law, the epa has provided California an exemption from federal standards. If trump wants to litigate it, he certainly can. (Just like sanctuary state laws lol). Meanwhile every ford, bmw, Honda and Volkswagen manufactured for sale in California will ignore trump. What a humiliation for trump.WestlinnDuck said:You have a legislative link for the exemption? Trump runs the EPA. He can change an EPA rule. Under the commerce clause he can institute an EPA standard requirement across all 50 states for auto manufacturers. Seems like Trump has been kicking ass on rogue federal district court immigration rulings. You are the guys who wanted an all powerful federal government. You should love this.
-
Trump's wants to halt the fuel efficent
And fourthly Trump's actions won't roll back the existing standards from where they are right now. So why are you lying and claiming that this action will take us back to haze over downtown LA?2001400ex said:
First of all, this is Trump talking and nothing is going to come of it.SFGbob said:
Hondo prefers to fuck strawman ass. Does this action by Trump roll back existing emission standards Hondo?2001400ex said:
Race prefers to go back to a haze over downtown LA every day.RaceBannon said:Consumers win. Bigly
Better and safer cars. Air standards at the fed level remain
Fuck California and the bed wetters
Secondly, California has tighter restrictions for a reason and I won't live there for that reason. Although I haven't gotten a ticket with my deleted diesel yet.
And lastly, what happened to states rights? They can't be more stringent than feds now?
Da fuq are you defending this for? -
Cal has a limited exemption subject to EPA review. Bush limited Cal's ability to regulate. Barry's EPA reversed that decision. It's up to the EPA to decide. Win in 2020 and you leftards can go back to phu*cking the little guy.
-
Insightful.WestlinnDuck said:Cal has a limited exemption subject to EPA review. Bush limited Cal's ability to regulate. Barry's EPA reversed that decision. It's up to the EPA to decide. Win in 2020 and you leftards can go back to phu*cking the little guy.
-
So much stupid in your post. You see Bob, if there are less stringent requirements, there will be more pollution in the air.SFGbob said:Trump's wants to halt the fuel efficent
And fourthly Trump's actions won't roll back the existing standards from where they are right now. So why are you lying and claiming that this action will take us back to haze over downtown LA?2001400ex said:
First of all, this is Trump talking and nothing is going to come of it.SFGbob said:
Hondo prefers to fuck strawman ass. Does this action by Trump roll back existing emission standards Hondo?2001400ex said:
Race prefers to go back to a haze over downtown LA every day.RaceBannon said:Consumers win. Bigly
Better and safer cars. Air standards at the fed level remain
Fuck California and the bed wetters
Secondly, California has tighter restrictions for a reason and I won't live there for that reason. Although I haven't gotten a ticket with my deleted diesel yet.
And lastly, what happened to states rights? They can't be more stringent than feds now?
Da fuq are you defending this for?
That being said, I have a question Bob. Trump says cars will be cheaper and therefore the consumer will pay less. Do you think the car manufacturers will sell cars for less? Explain your answer. -
Hondo fucking stupid
He's the target for this bullshit -
Is typhus pollution? Need a ruling from the judges.CuntWaffle said:California is already doing a great job of polluting California.
-
They will be no less stringent then they are now. So there will be no more pollution than there is now. So when you say that Race prefers to "go back to a haze over downtown LA" You're either lying or you're a fucking moron.2001400ex said:
So much stupid in your post. You see Bob, if there are less stringent requirements, there will be more pollution in the air.SFGbob said:Trump's wants to halt the fuel efficent
And fourthly Trump's actions won't roll back the existing standards from where they are right now. So why are you lying and claiming that this action will take us back to haze over downtown LA?2001400ex said:
First of all, this is Trump talking and nothing is going to come of it.SFGbob said:
Hondo prefers to fuck strawman ass. Does this action by Trump roll back existing emission standards Hondo?2001400ex said:
Race prefers to go back to a haze over downtown LA every day.RaceBannon said:Consumers win. Bigly
Better and safer cars. Air standards at the fed level remain
Fuck California and the bed wetters
Secondly, California has tighter restrictions for a reason and I won't live there for that reason. Although I haven't gotten a ticket with my deleted diesel yet.
And lastly, what happened to states rights? They can't be more stringent than feds now?
Da fuq are you defending this for?
That being said, I have a question Bob. Trump says cars will be cheaper and therefore the consumer will pay less. Do you think the car manufacturers will sell cars for less? Explain your answer.
How are we going back when the standard isn't changing from what it is today? In fact, the standard that Trump wants is the standard that is set to exist in 2020. -
You didn't answer the question. This is Trump's words.SFGbob said:
They will be no less stringent then they are now. So there will be no more pollution than there is now. So when you say that Race prefers to "go back to a haze over downtown LA" You're either lying or you're a fucking moron.2001400ex said:
So much stupid in your post. You see Bob, if there are less stringent requirements, there will be more pollution in the air.SFGbob said:Trump's wants to halt the fuel efficent
And fourthly Trump's actions won't roll back the existing standards from where they are right now. So why are you lying and claiming that this action will take us back to haze over downtown LA?2001400ex said:
First of all, this is Trump talking and nothing is going to come of it.SFGbob said:
Hondo prefers to fuck strawman ass. Does this action by Trump roll back existing emission standards Hondo?2001400ex said:
Race prefers to go back to a haze over downtown LA every day.RaceBannon said:Consumers win. Bigly
Better and safer cars. Air standards at the fed level remain
Fuck California and the bed wetters
Secondly, California has tighter restrictions for a reason and I won't live there for that reason. Although I haven't gotten a ticket with my deleted diesel yet.
And lastly, what happened to states rights? They can't be more stringent than feds now?
Da fuq are you defending this for?
That being said, I have a question Bob. Trump says cars will be cheaper and therefore the consumer will pay less. Do you think the car manufacturers will sell cars for less? Explain your answer.
How are we going back when the standard isn't changing from what it is today? In fact, the standard that Trump wants is the standard that is set to exist in 2020.
