I like to threaten force to seize property
Comments
-
Yes, lets lock it up for the police and the military, both of which serve the state. Brilliant solution.PurpleThrobber said:
That's sort of been my primary point the whole time. Lock that shit up for the police and military within the borders of this country. They serve no purpose for a peaceful populace committed to a representative democracy.MikeDamone said:
As long as the government has similar weapons, there is nothing to discussGrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them?
I don't see the lefties scurrying out with any circumstances under which they'd budge off their stance of gun confiscation (cough cough).....buy back. Or do they just want the gubmint to have all the leverage? -
The mental gymnastics required to be the party of troop/cop worship AND daydream about shooting those evil agents of the state in the face as the swarm your compound sounds like a helluva workout plan.
-
There’s a search feature?GrundleStiltzkin said:We discussed the armed citizenry vs. tyranny issue during your sabbatical @ThomasFremont . I suggest using the bored's excellent search feature to review.
-
It is, quite actually.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yes, lets lock it up for the police and the military, both of which serve the state. Brilliant solution.PurpleThrobber said:
That's sort of been my primary point the whole time. Lock that shit up for the police and military within the borders of this country. They serve no purpose for a peaceful populace committed to a representative democracy.MikeDamone said:
As long as the government has similar weapons, there is nothing to discussGrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them?
I don't see the lefties scurrying out with any circumstances under which they'd budge off their stance of gun confiscation (cough cough).....buy back. Or do they just want the gubmint to have all the leverage?
You're afraid of the state/military having guns that outdo the citizenry's....but you don't want to put in restraints or restrictions on the state having access to those munitions for use within the borders of the US?
Isn't that kind of circular logic as that's always been the go-to reason why the citizens shouldn't give up ANY of their arms.
-
Way more than half. They sweeti swore to uphold and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.ThomasFremont said:
Who’s “we”??? According to Damone half the nukes and military are going to side with the rebellion.RaceBannon said:We can't even nuke our enemies. We aren't nuking ourselves
Who are the rebellion? I’m glad you asked.
*pulls gun*
Fucking cop.
They pot that in for this very situation. An or of control government stripping constitutional rights by force.
The military won't play neither will 90% of the police.
So what you commies gonna do? -
Bing. Images. Use it. Put the word "nude" after every search made.ThomasFremont said:
There’s a search feature?GrundleStiltzkin said:We discussed the armed citizenry vs. tyranny issue during your sabbatical @ThomasFremont . I suggest using the bored's excellent search feature to review.
Trust me on this. -
Sledog is retarded. He's the agent of the state that he hates. Killing himself offers a perfect solution.ThomasFremont said:The mental gymnastics required to be the party of troop/cop worship AND daydream about shooting those evil agents of the state in the face as the swarm your compound sounds like a helluva workout plan.
-
Look at Sledog BRB, JOing to the idea of a military coup.
-
But they swore an oath!!1!ThomasFremont said:Look at Sledog BRB, JOing to the idea of a military coup.
-
To the Constitution and the 2A






