Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I like to threaten force to seize property

MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
Then get all cunty when someone pushes back



«13

Comments

  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,950
    edited September 2019
    Why is it that the pussiest little wimps are always the ones trying to take away other people's rights

    Rhetorical question
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,183 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2019
    Again - throwing out the concept - ban the assault weapons as long as the police/military are required to store theirs subject to an official act of congress for use within the US borders. There's other alternatives. Figure out what the opponent's underlying motive is for opposing any change and craft a solution that addresses it. It's called problem-solving.

    Quite honestly, I don't see a single reason for owning an assault/military-styhle weapon other than "they're fun to shoot" and the obvious "guard any government tyranny" which I totally get. That's a real fear based on actions in other countries without the right to bear arms and totalitarian regimes. That is a valid concern and the founding fathers knew that - maybe not imagining the crazy technology available but they understood the concept of a citizenry being held under the thumb of a tyrant without the means to fight back.

    Quid pro quo. While you fucks on the extreme of each side dick around, people get shot. Figure it out.

    Neither side wants to budge right now so this issue is non-starter shiny object shit. Come up with some alternatives instead of just drawing your sweet ass Congressional bennies, you fucks.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,183 Standard Supporter

    Again - throwing out the concept - ban the assault weapons as long as the police/military are required to store theirs subject to an official act of congress for use within the US borders. There's other alternatives. Figure out what the opponent's underlying motive is for opposing any change and craft a solution that addresses it. It's called problem-solving.

    Quite honestly, I don't see a single reason for owning an assault/military-styhle weapon other than "they're fun to shoot" and the obvious "guard any government tyranny" which I totally get. That's a real fear based on actions in other countries without the right to bear arms and totalitarian regimes. That is a valid concern and the founding fathers knew that - maybe not imagining the crazy technology available but they understood the concept of a citizenry being held under the thumb of a tyrant without the means to fight back.

    Quid pro quo. While you fucks on the extreme of each side dick around, people get shot. Figure it out.

    Neither side wants to budge right now so this issue is non-starter shiny object shit. Come up with some alternatives instead of just drawing your sweet ass Congressional bennies, you fucks.

    “Neither should anyone else”

    Except government agents. Which proves he’s not anti gun, he’s pro authoritarianism and control.
    Exactly the point. Unless the lefties are going to 'give' a little on the perception of authoritarianism and control, this is a non-starter/shiny object issue playing on the feelers of their 'base'.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    I keep asking where they'll get all those people with guns to go point them at citizens so they can take the citizens guns?

    Maybe Hondo can enlighten is. Since dems say you can't use locals to enforce federal law. Can't even make a phone call or send an email.

    Not working well in the eastern ban states. No one is complying.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    So fitting his name is Beta O’Rourke

    The Hispanic one.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,326 Standard Supporter
    What's your address?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213

    When running for the Senate in Texas Beta said

    However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

    "To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

    He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


    They lie. Its what they do its who they are

    And they are coming for your guns. I don't have any

    Of course they lie and that's all part of the game and their supporters know it. It's like when Obama said he opposed gay marriage and single payer.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter

    We have a fake Indian and a fake Hispanic in the dem race. Pretending to be a fake ethnicity is somehow seen as virtue signaling by leftards.

    We know how incredibly stupid left tards are.
Sign In or Register to comment.