Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I like to threaten force to seize property
Comments
-
Driving above the posted speed limit is illegal. Amusing one's self with an AR-15 is not.PurpleThrobber said:
Driving 130 down the freeway is fun, too - but generally frowned upon in the interest of other's safety.GrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them? -
That's sort of been my primary point the whole time. Lock that shit up for the police and military within the borders of this country. They serve no purpose for a peaceful populace committed to a representative democracy.MikeDamone said:
As long as the government has similar weapons, there is nothing to discussGrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them?
I don't see the lefties scurrying out with any circumstances under which they'd budge off their stance of gun confiscation (cough cough).....buy back. Or do they just want the gubmint to have all the leverage?
-
That's apple's to dog sh*t. You can't trust a dem. If police tell me they need AR 15s to defend themselves from criminals then so do I. Don't phu*ck with me and I won't phu*ck with you. Every dem presidential candidate wants something big from me. My healthcare, my free speech, my gas, my money and my guns.
-
For the record. I own zero guns.
-
The government has nukes. People forget that.MikeDamone said:
As long as the government has similar weapons, there is nothing to discussGrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them? -
People also forget in an rebellion at least half the military and nuclear arsenal won’t belong to the government.ThomasFremont said:
The government has nukes. People forget that.MikeDamone said:
As long as the government has similar weapons, there is nothing to discussGrundleStiltzkin said:
All things being equal, that's not enough?PurpleThrobber said:
Don't harsh my buzz with details.WestlinnDuck said:Va Tech shooting was hand guns. Vegas shooter was serious. Banning AR 15s wouldn't stop him. Bump stocks are now illegal.
Living in the middle of the bell curve is damned near as difficult with the 'from my cold dead hands' folk as 'the airplane flew itself into the WTC' people on the other end of the spectrum.
And jack shit gets done. Fuck that. Get some low hanging fruit for a change and learn the art of compromise.
I categorically deny anyone needs an AR-15 or assault weapons for anything other than their own amusement. I"m willing to accept the tyrannical government defense - but only to the extent that if that is taken off the table (come up with a better solution to assuage that fear if you can), then what else is left to cling to them? -
We can't even nuke our enemies. We aren't nuking ourselves
-
Nukes are great if you don't need anything from what you nuked. Not a lot of food or energy produced in DC or New York. Nuking some soldiers parents might be a non-starter. Thomas sure seems to want something that doesn't belong to him if nukes are on the table.
-
Who’s “we”??? According to Damone half the nukes and military are going to side with the rebellion.RaceBannon said:We can't even nuke our enemies. We aren't nuking ourselves
Who are the rebellion? I’m glad you asked.
*pulls gun*
Fucking cop.
-
We discussed the armed citizenry vs. tyranny issue during your sabbatical @ThomasFremont . I suggest using the bored's excellent search feature to review.
