Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Lib fact checkers. You just can’t make this crap up.

245678

Comments

  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    Boy you really got me this time Scott. 😂😂😂
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    Again obfuscating to draw attention away from another one of your ignorant and moronic statements. 😂
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    Start at 4 minutes

    REBUTTAL: The Left’s EVIL Infanticide Agenda!

    https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/left-infanticide-agenda/
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    edited September 2019
    GDS said:

    DJDuck said:

    GDS said:

    How do you fall for this shit all the time deej? Trump mischaracterized what the governor said and politifact correctly called his statement false. Never seen someone fall for this shit as often as you do...


    Fall for what you moron..........the truth.

    Politifact’s Gaslighting on Trump, Northam, and Abortion

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/politifacts-gaslighting-on-trump-northam-and-abortion/

    Scott runs cover for racist Ralph Northam AND Infanticide.
    JFC - Northam is talking about situations in which the fetus isn't viable. It's in the quote idiot. You know what not viable means right? It's not the doctor and mother that will decide if the baby will live or not. It's the doctor and mother deciding how best to care for a baby that's born but for whatever reason is not viable....infanticide...moron.
    But the bill he was being asked about said nothing about the viability of the fetus. It would have allowed for the woman to get an abortion when she was just minutes from giving birth and it would have allowed her to do so for reasons of "mental health." It also would have changed the certification process to allow such an abortion from 3 doctors to one doctor.

    He was being asked specifically about the bill being pushed by Kathy Tran


    The story begins on Jan. 28 when a subcommittee of the Virginia's House of Delegates was considering a Democrat-backed bill that would have loosened the state’s abortion laws in all stages of pregnancy. Much of the debate, however, focused on late-term abortions.

    Virginia allows third-trimester abortions in hospitals if three physicians certify that a continued pregnancy would "likely" kill the woman or "substantially and irremediably" harm her mental or physical health. The proposed bill, which was defeated, would have lowered the authorization from three physicians to one. That doctor only would have to certify that the pregnancy would damage a woman’s health. The "substantial and irremediable" threshold would have been repealed.

    The bill’s sponsor - Del. Kathy Tran, D-Fairfax - faced tough questioning from Republicans on the third-trimester proposals. Asked if the legislation would allow a woman who is dilating to get an abortion, she said, "My bill would allow that. Yes."



  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    Can you resuscitate non-viable babies?
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    edited September 2019
    SFGbob said:

    Can you resuscitate non-viable babies?

    of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    Can you resuscitate non-viable babies?

    of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
    Did Tran's bill only allow for a 3rd trimester abortion for non-viable babies?
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited September 2019
    Tulsi Gabbard just came out against third trimester abortions just like Roe.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    Can you resuscitate non-viable babies?

    of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
    Did Tran's bill only allow for a 3rd trimester abortion for non-viable babies?
    This thread isn't about Tran's bill, it's about Northam's comment where he specifically referenced non viable fetuses...or as Deej refers to it - infanticide. Northam is even referring to current law in his comments as he notes it requires more than one physician to certify. Do you think it's infanticide for a mother and doctor to discuss best course of treatment for a baby born with a terminal condition?
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited September 2019
    It wasn’t necessarily about non viable fetuses moron. Letting a child die that has been born IS Infanticide. You are fucked up.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/10/watch-nurse-testifies-infants-surviving-abortion-left-to-die-in-hospital-soiled-utility-room/