Trigger warning
Comments
-
Cool
-
Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
-
Other than the fact that liberals believe they are entitled to the wealth and labor of others tell us why this would be a good move?
-
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
-
That's the thing. Most of these elites have no problem with Warren's tax plan. They'll just shield their wealth overseas.2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
-
Brilliant:
"Billionaires such as Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett could have collectively lost hundreds of billions of dollars in net worth over decades if presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax plan had been in effect -- and they had done nothing to avoid it."
Only someone like HondoFS (and Yahoo News...) would think this is worth a poast... -
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
-
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
-
Pussy2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Anyone buying that Hondo wouldn't vote for Warren if she won the nomination?
-
NoSFGbob said:Anyone buying that Hondo wouldn't vote for Warren if she won the nomination?
-
I thought Race was a christian?
-
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know.
-
Republicans are just as irresponsible with entitlement spending as are the Rats. And the only reason the Rats want to cut military spending is so they can spend that money on more "free" shit for their voters.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
There were never any cuts. Fucking Rats screamed bloody murder over a slowing of the rate growth in entitlement spending and Obama was never going to go along with that.GDS said:
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Of course. Both are bought and paid for so it'll never happen.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Lil lyin Bob lyin as always. Read up on the sequester. If your Google isn't broken, use that.SFGbob said:
There were never any cuts. Fucking Rats screamed bloody murder over a slowing of the rate growth in entitlement spending and Obama was never going to go along with that.GDS said:
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Military spending is down compared to historical percentages of GDP. Entitlement spending is up because voters like free sh*t. Until we have a citizenry who understands that paying for Bill Gates's parents meds is unsustainable nothing will change and we will be broke. You can tax the rich and feed the poor until there are no rich no more. As someone once said.
-
We've played this game before Kunt. There were no cuts to entitlements.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob lyin as always. Read up on the sequester. If your Google isn't broken, use that.SFGbob said:
There were never any cuts. Fucking Rats screamed bloody murder over a slowing of the rate growth in entitlement spending and Obama was never going to go along with that.GDS said:
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know. -
Food stamp spending has been falling since 2013. Idiot.SFGbob said:
We've played this game before Kunt. There were no cuts to entitlements.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob lyin as always. Read up on the sequester. If your Google isn't broken, use that.SFGbob said:
There were never any cuts. Fucking Rats screamed bloody murder over a slowing of the rate growth in entitlement spending and Obama was never going to go along with that.GDS said:
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/policy-basics-the-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap -
Food stamps aren't an entitlement program and any reduction in the spending on Food Stamps didn't come because of sequestration. The "cut" in spending in 2013 was on account of the ending of the temporary boost in Food Stamp spending that was part of Obama's stimulus fraud, but other than that you fucking nailed it Hondo.2001400ex said:
Food stamp spending has been falling since 2013. Idiot.SFGbob said:
We've played this game before Kunt. There were no cuts to entitlements.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob lyin as always. Read up on the sequester. If your Google isn't broken, use that.SFGbob said:
There were never any cuts. Fucking Rats screamed bloody murder over a slowing of the rate growth in entitlement spending and Obama was never going to go along with that.GDS said:
Boehner and Obama got close in '11. Tea baggers killed the revenue side of it and Pelosi killed the cuts.greenblood said:
This will never happen. Republicans over spend on the military and Democrats overspend on entitlements and regulations. Same as always2001400ex said:
No Warren does not have my vote. And really the tax plan is fucktarded. Granted there's more people that it would effect. But going back to 1982 and they barely have over $100 billion in tax to the government on that list. We owe over $20 trillion....RaceBannon said:
They?2001400ex said:
I think they support the plan and are not worried.GDS said:Is this where you make some moronic comment that they shouldnt worry because her plan doesn't have a chance in hell of being passed?
Are you going to stop being a pussy and tell us if you do? Is Lizzie your gal this time?
Take a stand.
Keep in mind that Lizzie could take all their money and run the country for a few months at the current budget. Probably a few days after she implements her plans to destroy the economy and plunge poor people into the cold darkness of a decarbonized life
That being said, there should be more tax on the ultra wealthy. Combined with reduced spending. Crazy I know.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/policy-basics-the-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap
-
Oh it gets even better:
The 2009 Recovery Act’s temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits is scheduled to end on November 1, 2013, resulting in a benefit cut for nearly every SNAP household
In response to the economic downturn, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) increased Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits across the board as a way of delivering high “bang-for-the-buck” economic stimulus and easing hardship.
And Obama didn't want even this temporary increase to end.
It seems unlikely that Congress will enact legislation to remedy this problem, as President Obama and some members of Congress have proposed.
So you want to tell me again who the idiot is you fucking lying moron?
-
So to recap, Obama massively increase spending on Food Stamps through the stimulus fraud. This was always sold as a temporary increase and according to Nancy Pelosi the best way to boost an economy.
The temporary increase comes to an end in 2013 and Hondo the lying Kunt claims this is a "cut" in an entitlement program carried out by Obama. -
Of course, every liberal knows that if you get less than what you wanted IT'S A SPENDING CUT!!SFGbob said:So to recap, Obama massively increase spending on Food Stamps through the stimulus fraud. This was always sold as a temporary increase and according to Nancy Pelosi the best way to boost an economy.
The temporary increase comes to an end in 2013 and Hondo the lying Kunt claims this is a "cut" in an entitlement program carried out by Obama.
Liberalism.......find a cure. -
Correction, Food Stamps are an entitlement. But they weren't "cut" on account of sequestration.
-
Why should people her to keep their money when there are millions of Democrats who refuse to work? Rhett have a right to other proles money!.
Just ask them, they'll tell you! -
Hondo went silent. No surprise.SFGbob said:Oh it gets even better:
The 2009 Recovery Act’s temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits is schefduled to end on November 1, 2013, resulting in a benefit cut for nearly every SNAP household
In response to the economic downturn, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) increased Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits across the board as a way of delivering high “bang-for-the-buck” economic stimulus and easing hardship.
And Obama didn't want even this temporary increase to end.
It seems unlikely that Congress will enact legislation to remedy this problem, as President Obama and some members of Congress have proposed.
So you want to tell me again who the idiot is you fucking lying moron? -
No I just get bored arguing with an idiot playing word semantics and moving goal posts.MikeDamone said:
Hondo went silent. No surprise.SFGbob said:Oh it gets even better:
The 2009 Recovery Act’s temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits is schefduled to end on November 1, 2013, resulting in a benefit cut for nearly every SNAP household
In response to the economic downturn, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) increased Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits across the board as a way of delivering high “bang-for-the-buck” economic stimulus and easing hardship.
And Obama didn't want even this temporary increase to end.
It seems unlikely that Congress will enact legislation to remedy this problem, as President Obama and some members of Congress have proposed.
So you want to tell me again who the idiot is you fucking lying moron?