Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Clemson would lose 2 in pac12, same with bambi
Steel2 and i were talking about this. Clemson would lose 2 @ Utah, UW Oregon ASU on road. Bama 2 at least in any conference comprised of Pac, big 10, big 12. Clemson at least 2
Oregon, UW, Utah wouldnt lose a game in ACC. Only loss AT clemson, maybe. ACC worst conference ive seen in 30 years...by far. Most yous numbnuts dont know what teams make up the ACC. Back in day a tremendous conference, now its umbearable to watch, same with SEC
Even without LA schools, pac12 still the 3rd best conference this year...thats sad. SEC 2 schools. ACC 1. Any arguments? Doubtful.
1 ·
Comments
Climpson or Bambi would run the table. Maybe lose 1 at most. Fuck we went 11-1 with fucking Browning and way less talent.
If you care that much, take UW, SC, UCLA, Oregon, ASU, Stanford, and Cal and form a new conference. Dump the rest of the poor loser schools into a new division in the mountain west like we all know they really belong with anyways.
You get 1 non con, must be power 5 (not the losers you just separated from). Everyone plays each other twice in conference. 1 vs 2 in Vegas at the end of the year.
It's so fucking crazy I can barely handle it
The goofy motherfucker still hasn't realized we don't play you
If they played each other once, with Clemson having just that game to get up for with Pac 12 deck as the rest of their schedule, they'd win rather easily.
I should edit those two statements. I think paragraph one might happen. I know paragraph two would.
Nobody else in the conference would give them a game unless someone like ASU or Utah surprised them.
Oregon? Fucking lol. Clemson by 30+.
The ACC has never been strong unless we’re talking basketball.
Thanks for the laff pup!!!!!