Beyond parody’: PolitiFact rules 100% real photo of Biden w/former KKK ldr Bob Byrd as mostly-false
Comments
-
Libs lie. Its what they do. Who they are.
This example shows just how pathetic they are. -
I believe this was also Scotty's big "Gotcha" just a few weeks back. Byrd wasn't a Grand Wizard therefore who ever posted this was a "liar."
-
Not to be outdone lefty Snopes chimes in........
Snopes is here to explain to us how Joe Biden’s inaccuracy-filled war story wasn’t really all that false
https://twitchy.com/jacobb-38/2019/09/01/snopes-is-here-to-explain-to-us-how-joe-bidens-inaccuracy-filled-war-story-wasnt-really-all-that-false/ -
For the most part I like websites like Snopes and various other fact-checkers.
But I have noticed that if, say, there's talk of something bad about Democrat that is going around, they will write about how there's a little bit of missing context which, if left out, makes them look worse it will say "Mostly false", but then if there's something bad about a Republican that is mostly false, they will put "mixed" or something.
And honestly I try to read it this shit as objectively as I can. I am no stranger to having an open mind. Just what I have noticed. -
Liberal hacks. Highly slanted and false.
-
Can you give an example where something against a democrat was mostly false but something against a republican was a mixture? Here's a couple stories.Fenderbender123 said:For the most part I like websites like Snopes and various other fact-checkers.
But I have noticed that if, say, there's talk of something bad about Democrat that is going around, they will write about how there's a little bit of missing context which, if left out, makes them look worse it will say "Mostly false", but then if there's something bad about a Republican that is mostly false, they will put "mixed" or something.
And honestly I try to read it this shit as objectively as I can. I am no stranger to having an open mind. Just what I have noticed.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-biden-war-hero-story/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/sarah-palin-russia-house/ -
DJDuck said:
One of libs favorite fake fact checkers
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/08/31/beyond-parody-politifact-rules-100-real-photo-of-joe-biden-with-former-kkk-leader-robert-byrd-as-mostly-false/
What is the point you are getting at? This is what Snopes is fact checking. That statement is mostly false and they rated it as much.
“Biden with Grand wizard of KKK. So who again is playing you, lying to you, using you for the votes, Creators of the KKK, opposed civil right [sic] of blacks. Yup thats [sic] the Democratic party.”
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-kkk-klan-wizard/ -
Wonder why this thread died.
-
You posted in it
-
I know. Facts kill your circle jerk.SFGbob said:You posted in it
-
A conservative meme gets rated a lie because it contains a lie and seemingly this makes deej’s snatch sore. No doubt he appreciates the ass tonguing though Blob.
-
Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
Snopes is a joke. It always has been. Oh, and it is horribly biased. It was clear that the Clintons stole 200K worth of furniture and artifacts from the WH when they left. Snopes said the story wasn't true. By Snopes accounting (which they provided no proof of) it was only 50K they stole. In reading their conclusions it is very clear that they were shielding the clintons.
When Ben Carson found out that someone had ordered a $31,000 piece of furniture, Carson cancelled the order. Snopes concluded that it was true that Carsons office was ordering 31K worth of furniture. for some nitwit like the hondo's of the world, they read the conclusion and nothing else. Therefore, snopes told them that Carson was guilty of such waste of tax payer money. In listening to lib pundits and triggered tweeters, they swallowed the lies as well.
To argue that snopes and factcheck are accurate is to exercise ones ignorance.
Then you can count how many "facts" there were that were reviewed for Reps and then for libs. The Reps were focused on heavily.
If you look at who financially supports Politifact or factcheck.org, you see a looooong list of far far left liberal "foundation" money.
I think at last check, Republicans were given a "pants on fire" rating 59 times this year thus far. The dems were given a fraction of that. After all the lies about Trump and collusion, the lies that have never come true from our lib press, the fact checking sites spent their time on Trump and Reps.
-
Ben Carson admitted to CNN that they received the furniture. Which makes either Ben or your a liar.Bendintheriver said:Snopes is a joke. It always has been. Oh, and it is horribly biased. It was clear that the Clintons stole 200K worth of furniture and artifacts from the WH when they left. Snopes said the story wasn't true. By Snopes accounting (which they provided no proof of) it was only 50K they stole. In reading their conclusions it is very clear that they were shielding the clintons.
When Ben Carson found out that someone had ordered a $31,000 piece of furniture, Carson cancelled the order. Snopes concluded that it was true that Carsons office was ordering 31K worth of furniture. for some nitwit like the hondo's of the world, they read the conclusion and nothing else. Therefore, snopes told them that Carson was guilty of such waste of tax payer money. In listening to lib pundits and triggered tweeters, they swallowed the lies as well.
To argue that snopes and factcheck are accurate is to exercise ones ignorance.
Then you can count how many "facts" there were that were reviewed for Reps and then for libs. The Reps were focused on heavily.
If you look at who financially supports Politifact or factcheck.org, you see a looooong list of far far left liberal "foundation" money.
I think at last check, Republicans were given a "pants on fire" rating 59 times this year thus far. The dems were given a fraction of that. After all the lies about Trump and collusion, the lies that have never come true from our lib press, the fact checking sites spent their time on Trump and Reps.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-ben-carson-purchase-a-31000-dining-set-and-charge-it-to-hud/
And Clinton was investigated by a republican house committee and they found nothing illegal.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-stole-white-house-furniture/
Again you are comparing apples to oranges. Regardless, both articles are written fairly to each side, presenting facts. It's clear that facts bother you and you think something is a liberal source just because they called out someone on your side. -
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
40s? What the fuck are you talking about? He didn't filibuster the Civil Rights Act in the 1940s you fucking barely literate moron.2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.
Do you fucking know anything other than how to lie and act like a Kunt? -
Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.Sledog said:
Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately. -
Kunt logic, is their anything it can't do?2001400ex said:
Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.Sledog said:
Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.
Yeah, you can smear a Supreme Court nominee with pure unsubstantiated bullshit, while Hondo defends the Klan membership of the Rat party Senate leader as just some guy Biden shook hands with. -
Really? Different than for a senator?2001400ex said:
Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.Sledog said:
Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.
I guess so on your side:
One of your hero's. How is she not on a terrorist watch list?
-
you cannot be this fucking stupid can you...JFCSledog said:
Really? Different than for a senator?2001400ex said:
Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.Sledog said:
Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?2001400ex said:
I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.SFGbob said:
Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?GDS said:
and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.DJDuck said:Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.
No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.
I guess so on your side:
One of your hero's. How is she not on a terrorist watch list?
https://www.truthorfiction.com/was-rep-ilhan-omar-photographed-at-an-al-qaeda-training-camp/ -
As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!
-
The picture was taken in 1978. She was born in 1981. Al Qaeda didn't even exist until the 90's. FFSSledog said:As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!
-
-
look I'm applying liberal standards here like the Kavenaugh hearings. Now get on with the defense! Some wonky lib website says it's not true doesn't cut it.GDS said: -
You can't prove it's not here?
Needs to be impeached then.
-
I can prove that you are a fucking idiot by showing people this thread where you thought a picture taken in 1978 showed a woman born in 1981 in a training camp for a terrorist group that wasn't around until the 90's.Sledog said:You can't prove it's not here?
Needs to be impeached then.
