Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Offer total update

24

Comments

  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739

    dnc said:
    Arizona: 11 commits / 223 offers / 4.93% success rate / 82.73 avg 247 rating

    ASU: 16 commits / 227 offers / 7.04% success rate / 84.13 avg 247 rating

    Cal: 19 commits / 127 offers / 14.96% success rate / 84.95 avg 247 rating

    Colorado: 16 commits / 301 offers / 5.32% success rate / 84.56 avg 247 rating

    Oregon: 19 commits / 299 offers / 6.36% success rate / 88.58 avg 247 rating

    OSU: 12 commits / 148 offers / 8.11% success rate / 84.83 avg 247 rating

    Stanford: 13 commits / 63 offers / 20.63% success rate / 88.46 avg 247 rating

    UCLA: 11 commits / 95 offers / 11.58% success rate / 85.45 avg 247 rating

    USC: 10 commits / 155 offers / 6.45% success rate / 86.90 avg 247 rating

    Utah: 5 commits / 214 offers / 2.34% success rate / 84.40 avg 247 rating

    Washington: 19 commits / 70 offers / 27.14% success rate / 88.47 avg 247 rating

    WSU: 10 commits / 161 offers / 6.21% success rate / 84.60 avg 247 rating



    Arizona: 10 Three Stars / 1 Two Star

    ASU: 3 Four Stars / 12 Three Stars / 1 Two Star

    Cal: 1 Four Star / 18 Three Stars

    Colorado: 15 Three Stars / 1 Two Star

    Oregon: 7 Four Stars / 12 Three Stars

    OSU: 12 Three Stars

    Stanford: 3 Four Stars / 10 Three Stars

    UCLA: 4 Four Stars / 6 Three Stars / 1 Two Star

    USC: 1 Five Star / 1 Four Star / 8 Three Stars

    Utah: 5 Three Stars

    Washington: 7 Four Stars / 11 Three Stars / 1 Two Star

    WSU: 10 Three Stars
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,875 Founders Club
    Obviously each approach is based on the philosophy of the head coach but I look at Stanford & UW being very selective and having the 2nd & 3rd best average rating and then Oregon at the opposite end of the spectrum with the best average.

    Speaking hypothetically even though we don’t deal in hypotheticals around here Bob, can Oregon maintain its pace and the results? What they’re currently doing screams “we have no idea what we’re doing so we’re throwing against the wall to see what sticks”
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739

    Obviously each approach is based on the philosophy of the head coach but I look at Stanford & UW being very selective and having the 2nd & 3rd best average rating and then Oregon at the opposite end of the spectrum with the best average.

    Speaking hypothetically even though we don’t deal in hypotheticals around here Bob, can Oregon maintain its pace and the results? What they’re currently doing screams “we have no idea what we’re doing so we’re throwing against the wall to see what sticks”

    Without our punter, we are above them. But that is picking nits.

    What it says to me is that Stanford and UW know exactly what kids they are looking for that fits their program. Oregon OTHO offers kids from across the country regardless of if they might decommit for a local school or may not fit the program.

    Not to sound like Ballz, but I’ve heard from a few places that they do tend to look for highly rated kids, and that they want to offer as many as possible to drive hype.