Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

51% of mass shooters in 2019 were black, 29% were white, and 11% were Latino.

13468925

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes. They’re accurate. It’s also accurate to say that you, me and Tom Brady have 6 Super Bowl wins between us.

    That's some super Kunt logic you have working there O'Keefed. We are told that most all of these mass shootings are carried out by whites. Why does it make your snatch so sore to have facts that refute that claim?

    Does it challenge your narrative O'Keefed?
    Yeah, when some fucker kills his whole family or a drug deal goes South, that’s exactly like a Build the Wall white dude slaughtering Hispanic shoppers in a Wal-Mart because of Replacement Theory.
    It's funny that these are both the same when discussing "common sense" gun laws but different now.
    If you’re saying more than common sense gun laws are required to combat terrorism, I agree. Domestic terrorism seems to be a very white phenomenon recently.
    Yeah, especially when you have your own personal definition of what constitutes "domestic terrorism."

    I was just fortunate enough to have my own personal definition enacted by Congress in 2001.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Under the 2001 USA Patriot Act, domestic terrorism is defined as "activities that (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the U.S. or of any state; (B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S." This definition is made for the purposes of authorizing law enforcement investigations. While international terrorism ("acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries") is a defined crime in federal law,[5] no federal criminal offense exists which is referred to as "domestic terrorism". Acts of domestic terrorism are charged under specific laws, such as killing federal agents or "attempting to use explosives to destroy a building in interstate commerce".[6]


    Appear that this could be applied to many "mass shooting."
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332
    SFGbob said:

    Under the 2001 USA Patriot Act, domestic terrorism is defined as "activities that (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the U.S. or of any state; (B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S." This definition is made for the purposes of authorizing law enforcement investigations. While international terrorism ("acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries") is a defined crime in federal law,[5] no federal criminal offense exists which is referred to as "domestic terrorism". Acts of domestic terrorism are charged under specific laws, such as killing federal agents or "attempting to use explosives to destroy a building in interstate commerce".[6]


    Appear that this could be applied to many "mass shooting."

    A very low percentage.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,561 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes. They’re accurate. It’s also accurate to say that you, me and Tom Brady have 6 Super Bowl wins between us.

    That's some super Kunt logic you have working there O'Keefed. We are told that most all of these mass shootings are carried out by whites. Why does it make your snatch so sore to have facts that refute that claim?

    Does it challenge your narrative O'Keefed?
    Yeah, when some fucker kills his whole family or a drug deal goes South, that’s exactly like a Build the Wall white dude slaughtering Hispanic shoppers in a Wal-Mart because of Replacement Theory.
    It's funny that these are both the same when discussing "common sense" gun laws but different now.
    I'd like his views on what "common sense" gun laws I should be subjected to, as a tax paying law abiding citizen with a constitutional right to firearms. I always love when we are getting "common sense" laws. Nobody ever explains precisely what that means. I wonder why that is?
    What's funnier is a liberal using the term "common sense".
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    So if I shoot up my rival's house party I'm not engaging in act that's dangerous to human life intended to intimidate a civilian population?

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676
    Are you afraid of all white neighborhoods?

    Are you afraid of all black neighborhoods?

    Case closed. End of discussion
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,561 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes. They’re accurate. It’s also accurate to say that you, me and Tom Brady have 6 Super Bowl wins between us.

    That's some super Kunt logic you have working there O'Keefed. We are told that most all of these mass shootings are carried out by whites. Why does it make your snatch so sore to have facts that refute that claim?

    Does it challenge your narrative O'Keefed?
    Yeah, when some fucker kills his whole family or a drug deal goes South, that’s exactly like a Build the Wall white dude slaughtering Hispanic shoppers in a Wal-Mart because of Replacement Theory.
    It's funny that these are both the same when discussing "common sense" gun laws but different now.
    If you’re saying more than common sense gun laws are required to combat terrorism, I agree. Domestic terrorism seems to be a very white phenomenon recently.
    And predominately democrat/commie/socialist or progressive. Outlaw all of those and problem solved.

    At least that's the thought process on your side.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    What would be more effective in dealing with these mass shootings? "Common Sense" gun laws or a complete media embargo on the reporting of the names and manifestos and photos of the killers?

    We know for a fact that these mass shooters research previous mass shootings. Columbine is said to have been responsible for inspiring dozens and dozens of these mass shooters because of the way the shooters were portrayed in the MSM.