Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
MSNBC just two minutes ago...
Comments
-
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Did you wear your mask?HardlyClothed said:
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
Fuck Off. I'll give it three days before you return to your normal lying asshole self.CirrhosisDawg said:
This is sowing division ThudBomberFS. How is this helpful to creating unity?TurdBomber said:
Run along little man. This is a grownup argument.CirrhosisDawg said:All I see is division and disunity coming at a time when I hear we’re supposed to come together. Sad.
-
You’re pretty angry this morning. Exacerbated by your dementia?Sledog said:
A Pinko Faggot Commie talking about neo-Nazi's. That's special shit.HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
All Muslims are terrorists
-
This is such fucking horseshit. I can't believe the lengths you'll go to in order to perpetuate such falsehoods.HardlyClothed said:
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Okay, so Trump was calling Antifa "fine people." Got it.HardlyClothed said:
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
No like the rest of America we're tired of little pinkos like you. Move to your paradise of choice and be happy. Venezuela is kicking ass right now. you could probably get down there and get on an execution squad or something special like that. Maybe divert some food shipments and starve the population. All those fun things your ideology demands. It'll be like a commie summer camp!HardlyClothed said:
You’re pretty angry this morning. Exacerbated by your dementia?Sledog said:
A Pinko Faggot Commie talking about neo-Nazi's. That's special shit.HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Few on this thread will see the irreverent humor in this. Sad.RaceBannon said:All Muslims are terrorists
-
Sure, works for me. The problem is calling the white supremacists fine people, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Okay, so Trump was calling Antifa "fine people." Got it.HardlyClothed said:
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Wrong. But idiocy confirmed. So, thanks for that, HC.HardlyClothed said:
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
The protests and opposition to removing the statue and changing the name of the park pre-date the rally. The existing opposition was hi-jacked by the neo-Nazis. There were and are people on both sides of the issues who are fine people, there are also Neo-nazis and Antifa asswholes like yourself on both sides of the issue.HardlyClothed said:
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
Trump clearly states that he is not referring to the Neo-Nazis. But you're so invested in your lie you ignore and or dismiss his clear statements so that you can continue to push your lie. -
The existing opposition in Charlottesville who organized the rally to unite the right in Aug 2017 were white supremacist neo-Nazis. Anything suggesting otherwise is butchering the history of that event.
-
Not your best effort. At all.HardlyClothed said:
Sure, works for me. The problem is calling the white supremacists fine people, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Okay, so Trump was calling Antifa "fine people." Got it.HardlyClothed said:
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
And anyone who claims that the only people who oppose removing historical statues are all white supremacists is a fucking liar who is pushing an agenda.HardlyClothed said:The existing opposition in Charlottesville who organized the rally to unite the right in Aug 2017 were white supremacist neo-Nazis. Anything suggesting otherwise is butchering the history of that event.
Now for the question you've dodged 3 times. Was Trump calling Antifa "fine people?" -
“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”
Hondo Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html -
Well Hondo is the head of this Red Cell I guess "Hardly an American" will have to shut up now. Supreme leader has spoken!TurdBomber said:“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”
Hondo Link: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html -
There are like 12 white supremacists in the country
-
Here's another question for you to dodge HC. If Trump was "clearly" only referring to the Charlottsville unite the right rally and not talking about the larger issue of removing historical statues. Why did he bring up George Washington and Thomas Jefferson?HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
There were no Jefferson and Washington statues at issue in Charlottsville so why is he talking about that? -
"You had some very bad people in that group. You also had some very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group -- excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did."SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
So cmon Blob - what pictures did Trump see to make him think that there were fine people on the side of the argument that weren't necessary there that day but were part of some abstract group of people that disagreed with the removal of that statue? You are so full of shit on this one Blob. When he made his very fine people argument he was clearly talking about the neo-nazi led protest from that very day. So what type of very fine people feel compelled to protest alongside Neo-Nazi's chanting "Jews will not replace us"? You find a lot of very fine people that are compelled to stick around as Cantwell, Spencer, Duke etc spout their White Supremacist bullshit? GFO Blob. -
“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”
Clearly he was calling the neo-Nazis fine people.
So do you believe he was calling Antifa fine people?
I don't know what pictures Trump saw, I'm not a mind reader like you Scotty. -
-
Oh great, here comes scotti, another lie repeater.GDS said:
"You had some very bad people in that group. You also had some very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group -- excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did."SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
So cmon Blob - what pictures did Trump see to make him think that there were fine people on the side of the argument that weren't necessary there that day but were part of some abstract group of people that disagreed with the removal of that statue? You are so full of shit on this one Blob. When he made his very fine people argument he was clearly talking about the neo-nazi led protest from that very day. So what type of very fine people feel compelled to protest alongside Neo-Nazi's chanting "Jews will not replace us"? You find a lot of very fine people that are compelled to stick around as Cantwell, Spencer, Duke etc spout their White Supremacist bullshit? GFO Blob.
Jeezus you people are so dishonest in your quest for political control and control over all of us. -
I'll grant that Trump isn't always the most articulate and in this case he left an opening for dishonest critics to attack him but the question that both Scotty and and HC are dodging tells you that Trump wasn't referring to neo-Nazis as fine people. Because if that were the case you'd also have to believe that Trump was calling Antifa "fine people."Bendintheriver said:
Oh great, here comes scotti, another lie repeater.GDS said:
"You had some very bad people in that group. You also had some very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group -- excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did."SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
So cmon Blob - what pictures did Trump see to make him think that there were fine people on the side of the argument that weren't necessary there that day but were part of some abstract group of people that disagreed with the removal of that statue? You are so full of shit on this one Blob. When he made his very fine people argument he was clearly talking about the neo-nazi led protest from that very day. So what type of very fine people feel compelled to protest alongside Neo-Nazi's chanting "Jews will not replace us"? You find a lot of very fine people that are compelled to stick around as Cantwell, Spencer, Duke etc spout their White Supremacist bullshit? GFO Blob.
Jeezus you people are so dishonest in your quest for political control and control over all of us.
They know this destroys their claim so they dodge the question while still repeating their lie. Tells you a great deal about what kind of people they are. -
If you repeat a lie long and frequently enough.....
-
Imagine how fagged out this thread would get if blob actually liked Trump.
